Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jaime Hoogesteger (2012)
Democratizing Water Governance from the Grassroots: The Development of Interjuntas-Chimborazo in the Ecuadorian AndesHuman Organization, 71
David Cash, W. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel, P. Olsson, L. Pritchard, O. Young (2006)
Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
R. Boelens, Jaime Hoogesteger, E. Swyngedouw, J. Vos, P. Wester (2016)
Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspectiveWater International, 41
R. Boelens (2014)
Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlandsGeoforum, 57
P. Kollock, M. Argyle, R. Hinde, J. Groebel, E. Ostrom (2010)
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action
Jaime Hoogesteger, A. Verzijl (2015)
Grassroots scalar politics: Insights from peasant water struggles in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian AndesGeoforum, 62
J. Gupta, C. Pahl‐Wostl (2013)
Global Water Governance in the Context of Global and Multilevel Governance: Its Need, Form, and ChallengesEcology and Society, 18
J. Brown, Mark Purcell (2005)
There’s nothing inherent about scale: political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian AmazonGeoforum, 36
F. Padt, B. Arts (2014)
Concepts of Scale
Liliana Andonova, R. Mitchell (2010)
The Rescaling of Global Environmental PoliticsAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 35
M. Svampa (2015)
Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin AmericaSouth Atlantic Quarterly, 114
Amy Poteete (2012)
Levels, scales, linkages, and other 'multiples' affecting natural resourcesThe International Journal of the Commons, 6
J. Budds, L. Hinojosa (2012)
Restructuring and rescaling water governance in mining contexts: the co-production of waterscapes in PeruWater alternatives, 5
L. Cremers, M. Ooijevaar, R. Boelens (2005)
Institutional reform in the Andean irrigation sector: enabling policies for strengthening local rights and water managementNatural Resources Forum, 29
Olivier Graefe (2011)
River basins as new environmental regions? The depolitization of water managementProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14
F. Molle (2009)
River-basin planning and management: the social life of a conceptGeoforum, 40
D. Mackinnon (2011)
Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politicsProgress in Human Geography, 35
C. Pahl‐Wostl, J. Gupta, D. Petry (2008)
Governance and the Global Water System: A Theoretical ExplorationUnderstanding Global Cooperation
E. Swyngedouw (2004)
Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescalingCambridge Review of International Affairs, 17
E. Swyngedouw, B. Jessop (1997)
Neither Global Nor Local: ?Glocalization? and the Politics of Scale
D. Masson (2009)
Politique(s) des échelles et transnationalisation : perspectives géographiques, 28
Mathieu Uhel (2008)
Résistances et alternatives à la marchandisation de l¿eau: les mouvements sociaux à l´épreuve des échelles du pouvoir
J. Sze, J. London, F. Shilling, Gerardo Gambirazzio, T. Filan, M. Cadenasso (2009)
Defining and contesting environmental justice: Socio-natures and the politics of scale in the deltaAntipode, 41
R. Boelens (2008)
Water rights arenas in the Andes: Upscaling networks to Strengthen Local Water ControlWater alternatives, 1
T. Moss, J. Newig (2010)
Multilevel Water Governance and Problems of Scale: Setting the Stage for a Broader DebateEnvironmental Management, 46
Sanjeev Khagram, James Riker, Kathryn Sikkink (2002)
Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms
F. Padt, P. Opdam, N. Polman, C. Termeer (2014)
Scale-sensitive governance of the environment
S. Manson (2008)
Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human–environment systemsGeoforum, 39
Ken Conca (2005)
Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building
Santiago Ortiz (2016)
Marcha por el agua, la vida y la dignidad de los pueblosLetras Verdes: Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales
Eduardo Brondízio, E. Ostrom, O. Young (2009)
Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social CapitalAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 34
E. Swyngedouw (2005)
Dispossessing H2O: the contested terrain of water privatizationCapitalism Nature Socialism, 16
R. Boelens, Jaime Hoogesteger, M. Baud (2015)
Water reform governmentality in Ecuador: neoliberalism, centralization, and the restraining of polycentric authority and community rule-makingGeoforum, 64
P. Dufour, R. Goyer (2010)
Analyse de la transnationalisation de l’action collective : proposition pour une géographie des solidarités transnationales, 41
C. Pahl‐Wostl (2018)
Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to TransformationWater Governance in the Face of Global Change
Joana Guerrin, G. Bouleau, F. Grelot (2014)
“Functional fit” versus “politics of scale” in the governance of floodplain retention capacityJournal of Hydrology, 519
N. Smith (2012)
Homeless/global: Scaling places
C. Pentland, L. Hooghe (1997)
Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level GovernanceInternational Journal, 52
L. Lebel, P. Garden, M. Imamura (2005)
The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong RegionEcology and Society, 10
[The multi-level governance (MLG) framework emerged as a new approach to analyze the fragmented nature of socio-ecological systems, such as water resources. However, three main constraints have been identified regarding the concept: the reproduction of a cultural bias from the European perspective masking the multiple interpretations on water resources, the normative approach postulating the same structures without consideration of local contexts, and the ignorance of power relations. This chapter aims to further address the blind spots of the MLG framework through the case study of the national and transnational water community networks in Ecuador. It seeks to understand how water community networks mobilize scalar politics in order to influence water governance institutions shaped by the neo-extractivist strategies of the central State.]
Published: Sep 28, 2017
Keywords: Political Scale; Community Water; Water Governance; levelsLevels; Confederation Of Indigenous Nationalities Of Ecuador (CONAIE)
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.