Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics:Ethological Zoosemiotics

A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics:: Ethological Zoosemiotics [Ethological zoosemiotics, as seen in Chapter 1, is the primary and the most classical field of inquiry for zoosemiotics, i.e., the one that actually deals with the semiosic processes occurring among animals. It was also mentioned that the field can be divided into an early stage (eEZ) and a modern one (mEZ). In its early phase, zoosemiotics was mostly conceived as an umbrella term for gathering different approaches on animal communication. And “communication” was still the key-word, as in this stage there was a clear emphasis on this specific process, rather than the broader semiosis. Classical ethology and the then very trendy behaviouristic schools, finally, provide the scientific framework for (and document the uncertain semiotic identity of) this type of EZ.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics:Ethological Zoosemiotics

Part of the Biosemiotics Book Series (volume 5)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-critical-companion-to-zoosemiotics-ethological-zoosemiotics-UsHApy3pp7

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
ISBN
978-90-481-9248-9
Pages
65 –119
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-9249-6_2
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Ethological zoosemiotics, as seen in Chapter 1, is the primary and the most classical field of inquiry for zoosemiotics, i.e., the one that actually deals with the semiosic processes occurring among animals. It was also mentioned that the field can be divided into an early stage (eEZ) and a modern one (mEZ). In its early phase, zoosemiotics was mostly conceived as an umbrella term for gathering different approaches on animal communication. And “communication” was still the key-word, as in this stage there was a clear emphasis on this specific process, rather than the broader semiosis. Classical ethology and the then very trendy behaviouristic schools, finally, provide the scientific framework for (and document the uncertain semiotic identity of) this type of EZ.]

Published: Jun 10, 2010

Keywords: Alarm Call; Nonhuman Animal; Vervet Monkey; Multimodal Signal; Semiotic Process

There are no references for this article.