Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter we discuss forms of knowledge construction and consider these in relation to early childhood science education literature. We examine different regions of the world to see how research in science education has developed and what it has allowed us to better understand about the young learner. We consider the forms of logic drawn upon by scholars in the Australasia and South Pacific region, in the European and Nordic region, and the US. In order to understand the contributions these scholars have made for early childhood science education, we explore the forms of knowledge within the context of the child development paradigms that have underpinned science education. Our analysis of the literature draws upon a critique the following three paradigms: the individualistic paradigm, the social interactionist paradigm, and a cultural-historical paradigm. In this chapter empirical examples are presented in their original form from the country from which they were generated. This locates the research and theoretical concepts, but it also gives a more genuine international focus when conceptualsing science learning.]
Published: Aug 14, 2014
Keywords: Individualistic paradigm; Social interactionist paradigm; Cultural-historical paradigm; Australasia and South Pacific region; European region; Nordic region; United States
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.