Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Sambursky (1956)
On the Possible and the Probable in Ancient GreeceOsiris, 12
Catherine Jami (2002)
Imperial Control and Western Learning: The Kangxi Emperor's PerformanceLate Imperial China, 23
Norbert Meusnier (2018)
L'émergence d'une mathématique du probable au XVIIe siècleRevue d'histoire des mathématiques
F. David (1963)
Games, gods and gambling: The origins and history of probability and statistical ideas from the earliest times to the Newtonian era
Wang You-jun (2010)
The Evolution of Statistics in Modern China——From Social Statistics to Mathematical StatisticsJournal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
Y. Chan, M. Siu (2012)
Facing the change and meeting the challenge: mathematics curriculum of Tongwen Guan in China in the second half of the nineteenth centuryZDM, 44
Catherine Jami (1999)
“European Science in China” or “Western Learning”? Representations of Cross-Cultural Transmission, 1600–1800Science in Context, 12
Wang You-jun (2006)
Jueyi Shuxue:The Earliest Probability Book in Chinese with Laplacian Probability StyleStudies in the History of Natural Sciences
J. Elvin (2004)
Some Reflections on the Use of Styles of Scientific Thinking to Disaggregate and Sharpen Comparisons Between China and Europe from Sng to Mid-Qing Times (9601850 CE)History and Technology
I. Hsü (1971)
rise of modern China
J. Elvin (2010)
Personal Luck: Why Premodern China—Probably— Did Not Develop Probalistic Thinking
Benjamin Elman (2005)
On Their Own Terms
O. Sheynin (1974)
On the prehistory of the theory of probabilityArchive for History of Exact Sciences, 12
A. Bennett (1967)
John Fryer : the introduction of Western science and technology into nineteenth-century ChinaThe American Historical Review, 74
S. Jammalamadaka, P. Bernstein (1999)
Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of RiskThe American Statistician, 53
[In spite of the occurrence of many uncertain events in human experience in different civilizations since antiquity, be it in the East or the West, a quantitative approach to probability was not developed until the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in Western Europe. This peculiar “miss” is particularly notable in the history of Chinese mathematics, even though knowledge and skill in numerical calculation had long been well developed in ancient and medieval China.]
Published: May 13, 2015
Keywords: Europe
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.