Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, we systematically try to understand the genesis of the debate on the understanding of project management as an Art or as a Science. In doing so, we go back to the evolution of project management as a faculty and the current practices today. We also question the perspectives from the limitations that we see in the project experiences across the world. To keep the focus, we stick to business perspectives first, and methods later. We try to evaluate the approach from an action perspective rather than a reporting perspective. Two important introductory components that are touched upon here are Consulting Connoisseurs models on (a) the types of project environments and (b) the classification of projects (types of projects). Limitations of the conventional literature only emphasize the need to have a better system to structure and leverage from the definitions of project environments and the projects. We question the usability of the classification system from the perspective of the project manager who is in the field / on the job. In order to make such exercises more meaningful, we define alternative frameworks for both the project environments as well as the project classifications. In the process, we have also delved into the distinction between the two approaches: project environment versus project itself. The Ownership Model for Classifying Project Environments, introduced in this chapter, touches on the way project environments drive the success of a given manager in a given project/environment. The Business Abstraction Based Model for Projects defined in this chapter typifies projects by helping the project manager understand the broader controls associated with the project contexts. The chapter opens a vast range of potential perspectives that the project manager could develop for his specific situation. We also touch upon the use and misuse of stereotyping in such applications.]
Published: Aug 10, 2016
Keywords: PMBoK \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{\textregistered }$$\end{document}; Art versus science debate; Layered approach of PMBoK \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{\textregistered }$$\end{document} based approaches; Types of project environments; Ownership model for classifying project environments; Types of projects; Business abstraction-based model for project types
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.