Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of AmbivalenceRisk, Intersectionality, and Ambivalence: A Way to Understand Inequality

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of Ambivalence: Risk, Intersectionality, and... [The final chapter sums up the line of arguments in the book and adds key concepts, or conceptual apparatuses, of intersectional risk theory that has been defined and analysed in previous chapters. These concepts include intersectional risk positions, performative subjectification, doing, redoing, undoing risk, standpoint existentialism, and assemblages, and the chapter presents them one by one and discusses their contributions to intersectional risk theory. The chapter also reconnects with ambivalence and positions intersectional risk theory and its conceptual tools in such a frame, arguing that ambivalence embraces theoretical tensions and inconsistencies that provide insights into the dissonances of life as it is lived.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of AmbivalenceRisk, Intersectionality, and Ambivalence: A Way to Understand Inequality

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-framework-of-intersectional-risk-theory-in-the-age-of-ambivalence-HIub5clXzO
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020
ISBN
978-3-030-33523-6
Pages
157 –171
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-33524-3_9
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The final chapter sums up the line of arguments in the book and adds key concepts, or conceptual apparatuses, of intersectional risk theory that has been defined and analysed in previous chapters. These concepts include intersectional risk positions, performative subjectification, doing, redoing, undoing risk, standpoint existentialism, and assemblages, and the chapter presents them one by one and discusses their contributions to intersectional risk theory. The chapter also reconnects with ambivalence and positions intersectional risk theory and its conceptual tools in such a frame, arguing that ambivalence embraces theoretical tensions and inconsistencies that provide insights into the dissonances of life as it is lived.]

Published: Dec 12, 2019

Keywords: Risk; Intersectionality; Ambivalence; Inequality

There are no references for this article.