Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of AmbivalenceThe Age of Ambivalence

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of Ambivalence: The Age of Ambivalence [This chapter is aimed to set the scene for the book by introducing our view of ambivalence as an epistemological and ethical position, together with a short overview of the book. Although the concept of ambivalence is widely used in everyday speech and in various scientific fields, its meaning and usage seem to vary. One claim commonly made for ambivalence is that the concept reaches beyond dualistic ideas like ‘either/or’ to favour thinking that includes ‘both’. In so doing, it accommodates the simultaneous existence of conflicting ideas, which to us, seem a productive way forward in studying risk.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of AmbivalenceThe Age of Ambivalence

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-framework-of-intersectional-risk-theory-in-the-age-of-ambivalence-wzFQsA000C
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020
ISBN
978-3-030-33523-6
Pages
1 –17
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-33524-3_1
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter is aimed to set the scene for the book by introducing our view of ambivalence as an epistemological and ethical position, together with a short overview of the book. Although the concept of ambivalence is widely used in everyday speech and in various scientific fields, its meaning and usage seem to vary. One claim commonly made for ambivalence is that the concept reaches beyond dualistic ideas like ‘either/or’ to favour thinking that includes ‘both’. In so doing, it accommodates the simultaneous existence of conflicting ideas, which to us, seem a productive way forward in studying risk.]

Published: Dec 12, 2019

Keywords: Risk; Intersectionality; Ambivalence; Uncertainty

There are no references for this article.