Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Eckhardt (2013)
EU Unilateral Trade Policy‐Making: What Role for Import‐Dependent Firms?ERN: Urban Markets (Topic)
Emily Blanchard, C. Bown, Robert Johnson (2016)
Global Supply Chains and Trade PolicyEconometric Modeling: International Economics eJournal
Nicolas Lamp (2018)
How Should We Think about the Winners and Losers from Globalization? Three Narratives and Their Implications for the Redesign of International Economic AgreementsLSN: WTO Law (Topic)
G. Gereffi, J. Humphrey, R. Kaplinsky, T. Sturgeon (2001)
Introduction: Globalisation, Value Chains and DevelopmentIDS Bulletin, 32
C. Durand, Wiliiam Milberg (2019)
Intellectual monopoly in global value chainsReview of International Political Economy, 27
D. Rodrik (2018)
What Do Trade Agreements Really Do?International Trade eJournal
H. Farrell, Abraham Newman (2019)
Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State CoercionInternational Security, 44
Robert Johnson, Guillermo Noguera (2012)
Fragmentation and Trade in Value Added Over Four DecadesNBER Working Paper Series
In Kim, H. Milner, T. Bernauer, Iain Osgood, Gabriele Spilker, D. Tingley (2019)
Firms and Global Value Chains: Identifying Firms’ Multidimensional Trade PreferencesInternational Studies Quarterly
J. Ravenhill* (2014)
Global value chains and developmentReview of International Political Economy, 21
Ari Assche, Byron Gangnes (2019)
Global Value Chains and the Fragmentation of Trade Policy CoalitionsInternational Trade eJournal
Andreas Dür (2007)
EU Trade Policy as Protection for Exporters: The Agreements With Mexico and ChileEmerging Markets: Economics
J. Eckhardt, A. Poletti (2016)
The politics of global value chains: import-dependent firms and EU–Asia trade agreementsJournal of European Public Policy, 23
J. Humphrey, H. Schmitz (2002)
How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?Regional Studies, 36
Sophie Meunier, Kalypso Nicolaïdis (2019)
The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment PolicyJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
R Baldwin (2013)
13
J. Eckhardt, Kelley Lee (2018)
Global Value Chains, Firm Preferences and the Design of Preferential Trade AgreementsGlobal Policy
Christopher Gelpi, Joseph Grieco (2008)
Democracy, Interdependence, and the Sources of the Liberal PeaceJournal of Peace Research, 45
D. Geraets, C. Carroll, A. Willems (2015)
Reconciling Rules of Origin and Global Value Chains: The Case for ReformJournal of International Economic Law, 18
Matthew Watson (2017)
Historicising Ricardo’s comparative advantage theory, challenging the normative foundations of liberal International Political EconomyNew Political Economy, 22
Kei-Mu Yi (2008)
Can Multi-Stage Production Explain the Home Bias in Trade?International Trade
A. Park, Gaurav Nayyar, P. Low (2013)
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
Liam Campling, J. Harrison, B. Richardson, Adrian Smith, M. Barbu (2019)
South Korea's Automotive Labour Regime, Hyundai Motors’ Global Production Network and Trade‐Based Integration with the European UnionBritish Journal of Industrial Relations
C. Damro (2012)
Market power EuropeJournal of European Public Policy, 19
G. Gereffi, J. Humphrey, T. Sturgeon (2001)
The governance of global value chainsReview of International Political Economy, 12
Andreas Dür, J. Eckhardt, A. Poletti (2020)
Global value chains, the anti-globalization backlash, and EU trade policy: a research agendaJournal of European Public Policy, 27
[In light of this volume’s overall ambition to study to what extent the European Union’s trade agreements with East Asia are driven by geo-economic interests, this chapter discusses the impact of the rise of global value chains on the desire and ability of the EU to use these trade agreements for geo-economic purposes. According to the dominant liberal thesis on the relationship between global value chains and trade policy, the rise of global value chains will lead the EU to pursue more liberal, deep and comprehensive trade agreements and make it less willing to subordinate economic to foreign policy objectives. However, two alternative views challenge this hypothesis. According to a geo-economic perspective, global value chains stimulate security concerns and international rivalry resulting in a more strategic trade policy agenda. While a fair-trade perspective states that global value chains lead to stronger calls for integrating sustainable development goals in trade policy and empower the EU to use trade agreements for these purposes. This chapter first lays out the liberal thesis before discussing its challengers. It ends with some considerations about how specific analyses can differentiate geo-economic from liberal and fair-trade interests in EU-East Asia trade agreements.]
Published: Feb 5, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.