Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Wenting Cheng (2019)
China engages with the global intellectual property governance: The recent trendThe Journal of World Intellectual Property
T. Jaeger (2010)
The EU Approach to IP Protection in Partnership AgreementsEuropean Public Law: EU eJournal
B. O'connor, G. Bosio (2017)
The Global Struggle Between Europe and United States Over Geographical Indications in South Korea and in the TPP Economies
C. May (2004)
Capacity building and the (re)production of intellectual property rightsThird World Quarterly, 25
Henning Ruse-Khan, T. Jaeger, R. Kordič (2010)
The role of atypical acts in EU external trade and intellectual property policyEuropean Journal of International Law, 21
Mohammed Said (2007)
The European Trips-Plus Model and The Arab World: From Co-Operation to Association— A New Era in the Global IPRS Regime?Liverpool Law Review, 28
Henrik Horn, P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir (2009)
Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade AgreementsSRPN: World Trade Organisation (Topic)
B. Araujo (2013)
Intellectual Property and the EU’s Deep Trade AgendaJournal of International Economic Law, 16
J. Morin (2018)
Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providersThe Review of International Organizations, 15
Daniel Drezner (2005)
Globalization, harmonization, and competition: the different pathways to policy convergenceJournal of European Public Policy, 12
Sebastian Haunss, Kenneth Shadlen (2009)
Politics of Intellectual Property
G. Krikorian, Dorota Szymkowiak (2007)
Intellectual Property Rights in the Making: The Evolution of Intellectual Property Provisions in US Free Trade Agreements and Access to MedicineThe Journal of World Intellectual Property, 10
Iain Osgood, Yilang Feng (2018)
Intellectual property provisions and support for US trade agreementsThe Review of International Organizations, 13
T. Josling (2006)
The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade ConflictJournal of Agricultural Economics, 57
Madison Cartwright (2018)
Preferential trade agreements and power asymmetries: the case of technological protection measures in AustraliaThe Pacific Review, 32
C. May (2007)
The World Intellectual Property Organization and the Development AgendaGlobal Governance, 13
J. Morin, E. Gold (2014)
An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries†International Studies Quarterly, 58
D. Matthews, V. Munoz-Tellez (2006)
Bilateral Technical Assistance and TRIPS: The United States, Japan and the European Communities in Comparative PerspectiveThe Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9
K. Maskus (2014)
Assessing the Development Promise of IP Provisions in EU Economic Partnership Agreements
Kenneth Shadlen (2005)
Exchanging development for market access? Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreementsReview of International Political Economy, 12
Valbona Muzaka (2013)
Intellectual property protection and European ‘competitiveness'Review of International Political Economy, 20
Yongmin Chen, Thitima Puttitanun, Thitima Puttitanun (2005)
Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countriesJournal of Development Economics, 78
Kimberlee Weatherall, R. Burrell (2007)
Exporting Controversy? Reactions to the Copyright Provisions of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement: Lessons for US Trade Policy, 2008
J. Morin, Kevin Daley, E. Gold (2011)
Having Faith in IP: Empirical Evidence of IP ConversionsEntrepreneurship & Law eJournal
A. Moerland (2017)
Do Developing Countries Have a Say? Bilateral and Regional Intellectual Property Negotiations with the EUIIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48
J. Watal (2014)
Is TRIPS a Balanced Agreement from the Perspective of Recent Free Trade Agreements
[Promoting Intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a priority for the European Union and the United States. How have the EU and US pursued their strategies in the Asia-Pacific? This chapters compares their bilateral initiatives on IPRs across three strategies: treaty-making, coercion, and socialization. Through this analysis, we examine whether the EU and US’s bilateral actions indicate regulatory competition, coordination or duplication. We find that the overall tendency has been towards duplication, which raises questions about the reasons for this redundancy and its policy consequences. As the rise of bilateralism is not unique to IPRs, our findings have implications for global economic governance more generally.]
Published: Feb 5, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.