Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alasdair Young, J. Peterson (2014)
Parochial Global Europe: 21st Century Trade Politics
A. Bradford (2012)
The Brussels EffectColumbia Law School
J. Morin, Myriam Rochette (2017)
Transatlantic convergence of preferential trade agreements environmental clausesBusiness and Politics, 19
María García, A. Masselot (2015)
EU-Asia Free Trade Agreements as tools for social norm/legislation transferAsia Europe Journal, 13
A. Poletti, Daniela Sicurelli (2016)
The European Union, Preferential Trade Agreements, and the International Regulation of Sustainable BiofuelsERN: Environmental Studies (Topic)
R. Kelemen, D. Vogel (2010)
Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental PoliticsComparative Political Studies, 43
Ha Hoang (2016)
Normative Power Europe through trade: Vietnamese perceptionsInternational Relations, 30
M. Oehri (2015)
Comparing US and EU labour governance ‘near and far’ – hierarchy vs network?Journal of European Public Policy, 22
S. Charnovitz (1992)
Environmental and Labour Standards in TradeThe World Economy, 15
Elisa Morgera, Sikina Jinnah (2013)
Environmental Provisions in American and EU Free Trade Agreements: A Preliminary Comparison and Research AgendaReview of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 22
Henrik Horn, P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir (2009)
Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade AgreementsSRPN: World Trade Organisation (Topic)
J. Orbie (2011)
Promoting Labour Standards Through Trade: Normative Power or Regulatory State Europe?
Ida Bastiaens, E. Postnikov (2017)
Greening up: the effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreementsEnvironmental Politics, 26
E. Postnikov, Ida Bastiaens (2014)
Does dialogue work? The effectiveness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreementsJournal of European Public Policy, 21
E. Postnikov (2020)
Social Standards in EU and US Trade Agreements
J. Harrison, M. Barbu, Liam Campling, B. Richardson, Adrian Smith (2019)
Governing Labour Standards Through Free Trade Agreements: Limits of the European Union's Trade and Sustainable Development ChaptersERN: Urban Markets (Topic)
Lachlan Mckenzie, Katharina Meissner (2017)
Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations: The Case of the EU–Singapore FTAPublic Choice: Public Goods eJournal
J. Morin, Sikina Jinnah (2018)
The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governanceEnvironmental Politics, 27
A. Marx, F. Ebert, Nicolas Hachez (2017)
Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current ApproachesPolitics and Governance, 5
Alasdair Young (2015)
Liberalizing trade, not exporting rules: the limits to regulatory co-ordination in the EU's ‘new generation’ preferential trade agreementsJournal of European Public Policy, 22
Philip Alston (2004)
'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights RegimeEmployment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal
D. Bach, Abraham Newman (2007)
The European regulatory state and global public policy: micro-institutions, macro-influenceJournal of European Public Policy, 14
M. Oehri (2017)
US and EU External Labor Governance
Daniela Sicurelli (2015)
The EU as a norm promoter through trade. The perceptions of Vietnamese elitesAsia Europe Journal, 13
[Pressures have grown on European policy-makers to ensure that geo-economic interests do not come at the cost of the environment and workers’ rights. In light of increased public salience of EU trade deals with third countries, this chapter explores how the EU satisfies sustainability demands in trade agreements and how geopolitical considerations impact the design of specific clauses in recent trade deals with five Asian countries. We argue that while the relative impact of the international level on the design of sustainability clauses is not observable, the EU template allows for potential interactions between the sustainability dimensions of EU and US agreements. This chapter is divided into three parts. The first part provides an overview of the distinct characteristics of so-called Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters in EU trade agreements. We show how the EU’s ‘soft approach’ in the TSD chapters functions in particular contrast to the ‘hard approach’ followed in US trade agreements. In the second section, we explore how far geo-political considerations (‘cooperation’ and ‘competition’ scenarios) in the international sphere are able to explain the soft design of the EU TSD chapters. We come to the conclusion that internal EU dynamics (interests, ideas and institutions) are more likely to set the logic of TSD chapters. In the third section, we compare five TSD chapters in EU trade agreements with Korea, Singapore, Vietnam, Japan and Indonesia, finding further evidence for the EU’s continued use of a more or less coherent template, with some provisions adapted to Asian partner countries’ preferences.]
Published: Feb 5, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.