Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
SJ Davies (2005)
10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.020J Prosthet Dent, 94
CD Lynch (2002)
10.1067/mpr.2002.125178J Prosthet Dent, 87
HA Gremillion (2006)
10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.12.014J Evid Base Dent Pract, 6
VF Ferrario (1997)
10.1016/S0003-9969(97)00021-6Archs Oral Biol, 42
M Myers (1980)
10.1016/0022-3913(80)90052-9J Prosthet Dent, 44
SJ Davies (2004)
10.12968/denu.2004.31.6.334Re-organ Unorgan Dent Update, 31
SJ Davies (2007)
10.1038/bdj.2007.372Br Dent J, 202
LC Christensen (1983)
10.1016/0022-3913(83)90580-2J Prosthet Dent, 50
PF Briggs (1997)
10.1038/sj.bdj.4809457Br Dent J, 183
[In most patients, their Occlusion is functional, comfortable and aesthetic. So, if a tooth or teeth need to be restored, the most appropriate way to provide the restoration(s) is change anything: the static and dynamic occlusions or the jaw relationship of their pre-treatment Centric Occlusion, i.e. to adopt a ‘Conformative’ Approach.]
Published: Jun 4, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.