Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Causality plays a key role in the understanding of the world by humans. As such, it has been considered by artificial intelligence researchers from different perspectives ranging from the use of causal links in diagnosis or in reasoning about action to the ascription of causality relations and the assessment of responsibility. In the last two decades, some formal models of causality, such as those proposed by Pearl and Halpern, have been much influential beyond the field of artificial intelligence because they account for the distinction between actual causality and spurious correlations. Yet other aspects of causality modeling are worth of interest, such as the role played by the notion of abnormality, since what we need to explain are often deviations from the normal course of things. The chapter provides a brief but extensive overview of the artificial intelligence literature dealing with causality, albeit without the ambition of giving a complete account of works by philosophers and psychologists that have influenced it.]
Published: May 8, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.