Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A History of Palliative Care, 1500-1970Ethical Challenges

A History of Palliative Care, 1500-1970: Ethical Challenges [This chapter studies the early modern debates on major ethical challenges that arose in palliative care and which are still at the heart of medical ethics today: The permissibility of intentionally shortening of a dying person’s life, of giving medicines to alleviate a patient’s suffering that might accelerate the approach of death and of forgoing the attempt to cure dying patients, at the risk that the occasional, only seemingly desperate patient could have been saved by more radical means. The chapter highlights the very lively – and so far virtually unknown – debate on popular practices like “pulling the pillow” which were explicitly designed to speed up the dying process. In conclusion, it examines attitudes towards truth-telling and shows that physicians, fearing negative effects on the body, were unanimous that patients should be kept ignorant of their fatal prognosis as long as possible.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A History of Palliative Care, 1500-1970Ethical Challenges

Part of the Philosophy and Medicine Book Series (volume 123)
Stolberg, Michael
A History of Palliative Care, 1500-1970 — Apr 29, 2017
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-history-of-palliative-care-1500-1970-ethical-challenges-lugwEmxxkw

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
ISBN
978-3-319-54177-8
Pages
51 –68
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-54178-5_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter studies the early modern debates on major ethical challenges that arose in palliative care and which are still at the heart of medical ethics today: The permissibility of intentionally shortening of a dying person’s life, of giving medicines to alleviate a patient’s suffering that might accelerate the approach of death and of forgoing the attempt to cure dying patients, at the risk that the occasional, only seemingly desperate patient could have been saved by more radical means. The chapter highlights the very lively – and so far virtually unknown – debate on popular practices like “pulling the pillow” which were explicitly designed to speed up the dying process. In conclusion, it examines attitudes towards truth-telling and shows that physicians, fearing negative effects on the body, were unanimous that patients should be kept ignorant of their fatal prognosis as long as possible.]

Published: Apr 29, 2017

Keywords: Eighteenth Century; Seventeenth Century; Unfavorable Prognosis; Sick Person; Tumor Tumor

There are no references for this article.