Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A History of “Relevance” in Psychology“Relevance” and the SAPA-PIRSA Split

A History of “Relevance” in Psychology: “Relevance” and the SAPA-PIRSA Split [The year 1962 marked a watershed in the associational life of South African psychology. The South African Psychological Association’s (SAPA) much-feared split had come to pass. On June 23, approximately 200 people met at the University of South Africa to establish the Psychological Institute of the Republic of South Africa (PIRSA) (Louw 1987). The matter of admitting blacks to SAPA ranks had been shelved for 6 years, first with the application of an Indian psychologist, Josephine Naidoo, in 1956, and again in 1960 with another Indian psychologist, Chanderpaul Ramphal. Naidoo had been told by Simon Biesheuvel—then SAPA president—to withdraw her application as he “thought it better to let sleeping dogs lie” (Louw 1987, p. 342).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A History of “Relevance” in Psychology“Relevance” and the SAPA-PIRSA Split

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-history-of-relevance-in-psychology-relevance-and-the-sapa-pirsa-eFJbHk6fLu
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016. The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
ISBN
978-1-137-47488-9
Pages
85 –116
DOI
10.1057/978-1-137-47489-6_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The year 1962 marked a watershed in the associational life of South African psychology. The South African Psychological Association’s (SAPA) much-feared split had come to pass. On June 23, approximately 200 people met at the University of South Africa to establish the Psychological Institute of the Republic of South Africa (PIRSA) (Louw 1987). The matter of admitting blacks to SAPA ranks had been shelved for 6 years, first with the application of an Indian psychologist, Josephine Naidoo, in 1956, and again in 1960 with another Indian psychologist, Chanderpaul Ramphal. Naidoo had been told by Simon Biesheuvel—then SAPA president—to withdraw her application as he “thought it better to let sleeping dogs lie” (Louw 1987, p. 342).]

Published: Jun 24, 2016

Keywords: Prime Minister; National Party; Civil Religion; Indian Psychologist; Annual General Meeting

There are no references for this article.