Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Jurisprudence of the BodyHealthcare, Well-being, and the Regulation of Diversity in Healing

A Jurisprudence of the Body: Healthcare, Well-being, and the Regulation of Diversity in Healing [While the diversity of healing practices and knowledges is not new, controversies triggered by non-conventional medicines have intensified over the years. Contemporary regulation tends to rely on a core difference between proven and unproven therapies, and on scientific logics, to adjudicate questions of legitimacy, authority and funding. But such focus on science does not easily map onto the multiple ontologies at play in how patients and healers approach healthcare, and has limited the ability of law to adequately engage with non-biomedical healing systems. In the contemporary context, plagued with scarcity and neoliberal logics, such disalignment has become more visible, creating ongoing pressures for the regulation of healthcare. Meanwhile, self-proclaimed healers thrive in this highly commercialised environment, where people seek healthcare outside the state-regulated healthcare system. In this chapter, we analyse these tensions and challenges as emerging, in part, from the difficulty for law to respond to multiple ontological worlds. At the same time, we draw on scholarship on vulnerability and care to explore how healing could be ordered and regulated if we were to decentre the idea of evidence from one of pure rationale.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Jurisprudence of the BodyHealthcare, Well-being, and the Regulation of Diversity in Healing

Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies Book Series
Editors: Dietz, Chris; Travis, Mitchell; Thomson, Michael
Cloatre, Emilie; Urquiza-Haas, Nayeli
A Jurisprudence of the Body — Aug 6, 2020
Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-jurisprudence-of-the-body-healthcare-well-being-and-the-regulation-MofiU81FYx
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. Chapter 5 is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). For further details see licence information in the chapter.
ISBN
978-3-030-42199-1
Pages
91 –116
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-42200-4_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[While the diversity of healing practices and knowledges is not new, controversies triggered by non-conventional medicines have intensified over the years. Contemporary regulation tends to rely on a core difference between proven and unproven therapies, and on scientific logics, to adjudicate questions of legitimacy, authority and funding. But such focus on science does not easily map onto the multiple ontologies at play in how patients and healers approach healthcare, and has limited the ability of law to adequately engage with non-biomedical healing systems. In the contemporary context, plagued with scarcity and neoliberal logics, such disalignment has become more visible, creating ongoing pressures for the regulation of healthcare. Meanwhile, self-proclaimed healers thrive in this highly commercialised environment, where people seek healthcare outside the state-regulated healthcare system. In this chapter, we analyse these tensions and challenges as emerging, in part, from the difficulty for law to respond to multiple ontological worlds. At the same time, we draw on scholarship on vulnerability and care to explore how healing could be ordered and regulated if we were to decentre the idea of evidence from one of pure rationale.]

Published: Aug 6, 2020

Keywords: Healthcare; Well-being; Healing; Legitimacy; Knowledge; CAM; Evidence

There are no references for this article.