A Jurisprudence of the BodyTemporal Bodies: Emergencies, Emergence, and Intersex Embodiment
A Jurisprudence of the Body: Temporal Bodies: Emergencies, Emergence, and Intersex Embodiment
Garland, Fae; Travis, Mitchell
2020-08-06 00:00:00
[This chapter demonstrates the ways in which temporalities are institutionally constructed. To do so, the chapter engages with intersex embodiment to show how the institutions of healthcare, psychosocial care, and law offer different temporal constructions of the same body alternating between emergency and emergence. Whereas intersex embodiment has often been understood in terms of ‘emergency’ necessitating ‘one-off’ interventions in order to ‘fix’ the child, this chapter attempts to reorient care towards ‘emergence’ focusing on the needs of the intersex person across the whole of the life course. In doing so, this chapter encourages clinical and juridical decision makers to engage with deferability as a crucial element of best interests assessments. Deferability, as this chapter demonstrates, offers clear guidelines to practitioners and policy makers in the determination of emergencies.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-jurisprudence-of-the-body-temporal-bodies-emergencies-emergence-and-jgGwPsCsNQ
A Jurisprudence of the BodyTemporal Bodies: Emergencies, Emergence, and Intersex Embodiment
[This chapter demonstrates the ways in which temporalities are institutionally constructed. To do so, the chapter engages with intersex embodiment to show how the institutions of healthcare, psychosocial care, and law offer different temporal constructions of the same body alternating between emergency and emergence. Whereas intersex embodiment has often been understood in terms of ‘emergency’ necessitating ‘one-off’ interventions in order to ‘fix’ the child, this chapter attempts to reorient care towards ‘emergence’ focusing on the needs of the intersex person across the whole of the life course. In doing so, this chapter encourages clinical and juridical decision makers to engage with deferability as a crucial element of best interests assessments. Deferability, as this chapter demonstrates, offers clear guidelines to practitioners and policy makers in the determination of emergencies.]
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.