Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Sunstein (1997)
Free markets and social justice
M. Nussbaum (2003)
CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICEFeminist Economics, 9
Yasmin Dawood (2013)
Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and EqualityCanadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 26
C. Christians (2007)
Utilitarianism in Media Ethics and Its DiscontentsJournal of Mass Media Ethics, 22
A. Plotkin (1996)
The first amendment and democracy: The challenge of new technologyJournal of Mass Media Ethics, 11
S. Fukuda‐Parr (2003)
THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM: OPERATIONALIZING SEN'S IDEAS ON CAPABILITIESFeminist Economics, 9
J. Rawls (1991)
Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical
Corey Brettschneider (2010)
When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? The Dilemmas of Freedom of Expression and Democratic PersuasionPerspectives on Politics, 8
Michael Sandel (1984)
Liberalism and its critics
A. Buchanan (2000)
Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World*Ethics, 110
Katrin Toens (2007)
The Dilemma of RegressEuropean Journal of Political Theory, 6
A. Sen (2009)
The idea of justicePhilosophy & Social Criticism, 41
N. Daniels (2002)
Democratic Equality: Rawls’s Complex Egalitarianism
A. Goldman (1999)
Knowledge in a Social World
E. Barendt (1998)
Judging the Media: Impartiality and BroadcastingThe Political Quarterly, 69
S. Okin (1990)
Justice, Gender, and the Family
E. Weber (2008)
Dewey and Rawls on EducationHuman Studies, 31
L. Sama, Victoria Shoaf (2002)
Ethics on the Web: Applying Moral Decision-Making to the New MediaJournal of Business Ethics, 36
R. Dworkin (2000)
Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality
S. Splichal (1999)
Ownership Regulation and Socialisation: Rethinking the Principles of Democratic MediaJavnost-the Public, 6
B. Hopwood, M. Mellor, G. O’Brien (2005)
Sustainable development: mapping different approachesSustainable Development, 13
Matteo Bonotti (2015)
Political liberalism, free speech and public reasonEuropean Journal of Political Theory, 14
Amit Schejter, Noam Tirosh (2014)
New Media Policy
J. Dryzek, C. List (2002)
Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A ReconciliationBritish Journal of Political Science, 33
L. Hamer, M. Jenkins, Bradene Moore (2013)
Toward a Cultural Framework for Dialogue About JusticeJournal of Black Studies, 44
Erwin Krasnow, Jack Goodman (1998)
The "Public Interest" Standard: The Search for the Holy GrailFederal Communications Law Journal, 50
T. Williamson (2012)
An Emancipatory Interpretation of Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls, Wright, Sen, and PoliticsThe Good Society, 21
Deni Elliott (2007)
Getting Mill RightJournal of Mass Media Ethics, 22
Natalie Fenton, Gavan Titley (2015)
Mourning and longing: Media studies learning to let go of liberal democracyEuropean Journal of Communication, 30
C. Fabre, David Miller (2003)
Justice and Culture: Rawls, Sen, Acile Fabreo' NeillPolitical Studies Review, 1
A. Sen (1990)
Welfare, Freedom and Social Choice: a ReplyRecherches économiques de Louvain
J. Barron (1967)
Access to the Press. A New First Amendment RightHarvard Law Review, 80
N. Strossen (1996)
Hate Speech and Pornography: Do We Have to Choose between Freedom of Speech and Equality ?Case Western Reserve law review, 46
C. Card (2000)
Book ReviewEthics, 110
David Dollar, Aart Kraay (2001)
Growth is Good for the PoorJournal of Economic Growth, 7
S. Pressman, G. Summerfield (2000)
The Economic Contributions of Amartya SenReview of Political Economy, 12
David Levy (1999)
Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State
赫尓徳, Held, 燕继荣 (1986)
民主的模式 = Models of democracy
Amartya Sen, S. Fukuda‐Parr (2003)
Development as Capability Expansion
A. Sen (1980)
Equality of What?Seven Deadly Economic Sins
Owen Fiss (1996)
The irony of free speech
David Estlund (1998)
Debate: Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen’s Critique of RawlsJournal of Political Philosophy, 6
Jan G.M, Van Dijk (1996)
Models of Democracy – Behind the Design and Use of New Media in PoliticsJavnost-the Public, 6
A. Sen (2004)
Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the ConversationFeminist Economics, 10
J. Bentham, J. Mill, Philip Wheelwright, James Mill (1935)
Jeremy Bentham : An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation
A. Gutmann (2002)
Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy
Petros Iosifidis (2005)
The Application of EC Competition Policy to the Media IndustryInternational Journal on Media Management, 7
M. Stucke (2009)
Concentrated Media is Something We Can't Ignore: A Response to Speaker Pelosi
J. Bohman (2007)
Beyond Distributive Justice and Struggles for RecognitionEuropean Journal of Political Theory, 6
A. Sen (2004)
Elements of a Theory of Human RightsPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 32
R. Hutchins (1947)
A Free and Responsible Press: A General Report on Mass Communication: Newspapers, Radio, Motion Pictures, Magazines, and Books
Ien Ang (1991)
Desperately seeking the audience
Amit Schejter, Moran Yemini (2007)
'Justice, and Only Justice, You Shall Pursue': Network Neutrality, the First Amendment and John Rawls' Theory of JusticeEconomics of Networks
[We describe three philosophies of justice: (a) the utilitarian, which says that decisions should be made with the aim of producing the greatest good for the greatest number; (b) John Rawls’s theory of justice, which contends that social and economic inequalities should be rearranged so that they provide the greatest advantage to the least advantaged; and (c) Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which focuses on a people’s actual ability to make use of the opportunities available to them. Utilitarian foundations support mostly negative justifications for freedom of expression, the basic substantive right that humans should justly enjoy. Rawlsian philosophy ensures a minimal level of free expression. The capability approach focuses on people’s ability to put speech to use in ways they themselves see fit.]
Published: Dec 7, 2016
Keywords: Justice; Utilitarianism; John Rawls; Amartya Sen; Redistributive justice; Capabilities approach
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.