Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Bergmann, Jeffrey Brower (2006)
A Theistic Argument Against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity)
W. Mann (2007)
Divine Sovereignty and Aseity
S. Shapiro (1997)
Philosophy of mathematics : structure and ontology, 4
Mel Thompson (2003)
Philosophy of Mind
Brian Leftow (2012)
On God and NecessityFaith and Philosophy, 31
Alvin Plantinga (1983)
Does God have a nature
W. Craig (2012)
Nominalism and Divine Aseity
P. Thomas, Caramello (1948)
Summa Theologiae Cura Et Studio Sac. Petri Caramello Cum Texto Ex Recensione Leonina
[The third alternative to universals discussed in this work is theological nominalism. This form of nominalism postulates concepts in the mind of God to replace universals. There are many advantages of this position over regular concept nominalism. Nevertheless, it is argued here that the conception seems unfeasible if one supposes divine simplicity. It is also affected by a problem of regress specific to this form of nominalism. The chapter finally considers if Platonic universals are incompatible with divine aseity. They are not.]
Published: Oct 28, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.