Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Having dealt with the emotional and rational underpinnings of the conventional notion of an afterlife, we turn to building the argument for a naturalistic alternative. The first order of business is to specify the base characteristics of a naturalistic afterlife: for example, it must not involve the survival of consciousness or claims of transcendence while at the same time being continuous with the mortal life that preceded it. To flesh this out, the possibility of a naturalistic afterlife is examined under the two principal philosophies of time: the standard view of time as flowing from past to future, or the block universe view, in which past, present, and future coexist as part of spacetime. If the block universe concept of time is correct, we find at least two plausible forms of a naturalistic afterlife: tenseless immortality and eternal recurrence. But that still leaves us with the question of whether such possibilities, scientifically defensible but divorced from our lived experience, can satisfy us emotionally as well.]
Published: Aug 2, 2017
Keywords: Philosophy of time; Time; Entropy; Albert Einstein
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.