Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The December 17, 2014 announcements that Cuba and the United States had agreed to begin normalizing their bilateral relationship significantly reduced the threat that Washington posed to Cuban national security—a threat that has been acute for the past half century. From 1959 to 2014, except for brief interludes in the mid 1970s, the objective of US policy was to force regime change through diplomatic isolation, economic pressure, and covert subversion. Obama’s opening to Cuba is historic precisely because he abandoned coercive diplomacy, replacing it with a strategy of engagement and coexistence. “I do not believe we can keep doing the same thing for over five decades and expect a different result,” the president said, explaining his decision to give up on regime change. “Moreover, it does not serve America’s interests, or the Cuban people, to try to push Cuba toward collapse. Even if that worked—and it hasn’t for 50 years—we know from hard-earned experience that countries are more likely to enjoy lasting transformation if their people are not subjected to chaos” (Obama 2014).]
Published: Apr 18, 2016
Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment; Civil Society; American Political Science Review; United States Code; Cuban Revolution
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.