Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[On one hand, chemistry is very rich. On the other hand, density functionals are all approximate and mostly contain empirical parameters, such that not every functional is equally applicable to every chemical problem. This has made benchmarking of the functional performance inevitable. Our focus here is to examine the performance of some fifth rung functionals, while selected results of the lower rung functionals are presented for comparison. We have examined the DHDFs’ performance in the prediction of heats of formation (HOFs, Sect. 3.1), ionization potentials (IPs, Sect. 3.2), electron affinities (EAs, Sect. 3.2), bond dissociation energies (BDEs, Sect. 3.3), reaction barrier heights (RBHs, Sect. 3.4), and noncovalent interactions (NCIs, Sect. 3.5) using some well-established benchmarking data sets.]
Published: Nov 20, 2013
Keywords: Heats of formation; Ionization potential; Electron affinity; Bond dissociation energy; Reaction barrier height; Noncovalent interaction
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.