Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Fama, K. French (2014)
A Five-Factor Asset Pricing ModelS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Kent Daniel, L. Mota, S. Rottke, T. Santos (2020)
The Cross-Section of Risk and ReturnsReview of Financial Studies, 33
E. Fama, K. French (1993)
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 33
E. Fama, K. French (1992)
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
E. Fama, K. French (1996)
The CAPM is Wanted, Dead or AliveJournal of Finance, 51
Francisco Barillas, Jay Shanken (2015)
Comparing Asset Pricing ModelsERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)
T. Adrian, Erkko Etula, Tyler Muir (2014)
Financial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset Returns: Financial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset ReturnsJournal of Finance, 69
W. Ferson, Suresh Nallareddy, Biqin Xie (2010)
The "Out of Sample" Performance of Long-Run Risk ModelsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
E. Fama, James MacBeth (1973)
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical TestsJournal of Political Economy, 81
J. Lewellen, S. Nagel, Jay Shanken (2006)
A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset-Pricing TestsNBER Working Paper Series
C. Peake (2005)
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and EvidenceCfa Digest, 35
A. Dempster, N. Laird, D. Rubin (1977)
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
Dongcheol Kim (1995)
The Errors in the Variables Problem in the Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 50
Kent Daniel, S. Titman (2012)
Testing Factor-Model Explanations of Market Anomalies, 1
R. Stambaugh, Yu Yuan (2015)
Mispricing FactorsFEN: Behavioral Finance (Topic)
Richard Roll (1977)
A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory''s Tests: Part I
Andrew Ang, Jun Liu, Krista Schwarz (2018)
Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor ModelsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55
Wei Liu, J. Kolari, Jianhua Huang (2017)
Two Market Forces in Asset PricesERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Corporate Finance & Governance (Topic)
R. McLean, Jeffrey Pontiff (2015)
Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?ERN: Econometric Studies of Capital Markets (Topic)
R. Jagannathan, Zhenyu Wang (1996)
The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected ReturnsJournal of Finance, 51
F. Black (1972)
Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted BorrowingThe Journal of Business, 45
J. Campbell
AMERICAN FINANCE ASSOCIATIONThe Journal of Finance
M. Jensen, F. Black, Myron Scholes (2006)
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical TestsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
Shawn Cole, X. Giné, J. Vickery (2013)
How Does Risk Management Influence Production Decisions? Evidence from a Field ExperimentBanking & Insurance eJournal
W. Sharpe (1964)
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*Journal of Finance, 19
M. Lettau, Markus Pelger (2018)
Factors That Fit the Time Series and Cross-Section of Stock ReturnsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
Jeremiah Green, John Hand, F. Zhang (2016)
The Characteristics that Provide Independent Information about Average U.S. Monthly Stock ReturnsCapital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal
Clifford Ang (2018)
International Tests of a Five-Factor Asset Pricing ModelCfa Digest, 48
Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal, Alessio Saretto (2017)
Anomalies and False RejectionsBehavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal
M. Lettau, Sydney Ludvigson (1999)
Consumption, Aggregate Wealth and Expected Stock ReturnsEuropean Finance
J. Cochrane (2011)
Presidential Address: Discount RatesJournal of Finance, 66
Campbell Harvey (2017)
Presidential Address: The Scientific Outlook in Financial EconomicsERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)
P. Gagliardini, Elisa Ossola, O. Scaillet, O. Scaillet (2016)
Time-Varying Risk Premium in Large Cross-Sectional Equity Data SetsEconometrica, 84
Ravi Bansal, A. Yaron (2000)
Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing PuzzlesCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
E. Fama, K. French (1995)
Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and ReturnsJournal of Finance, 50
Juhani Linnainmaa, Michael Roberts (2016)
The History of the Cross Section of Stock ReturnsEconometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal
Kewei Hou, Chen Xue, Lu Zhang (2012)
Digesting Anomalies: An Investment ApproachFinancial Accounting eJournal
Tarun Chordia, A. Subrahmanyam, Qing Tong (2014)
Have Capital Market Anomalies Attenuated in the Recent Era of High Liquidity and Trading Activity?S&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
[This chapter reports formal cross-sectional tests of the empirical ZCAPM compared to popular asset pricing models. As in the previous chapter, our tests utilize all U.S. common stock returns from January 1965 to December 2018. We report extensive out-of-sample Fama and MacBeth (1973) cross-sectional tests of the ZCAPM compared to other asset pricing models. Our goal is to demonstrate using a weight of stock return evidence that the ZCAPM is the dominant asset pricing model relative to existing prominent models. In brief, the results of our tests strongly favor the empirical ZCAPM over other models. In test-after-test, zeta risk loadings in the ZCAPM have the highest t-values in cross-sectional regression analyses in the range of 3–6 that well exceed all multifactors in popular models. Not only are the t-values exceptionally high by any recommended threshold in the asset pricing literature, but zeta risk loadings are consistently positive and significant in terms of pricing return dispersion sensitivity in virtually all test assets investigated here. Additionally, across a variety of test assets, goodness-of-fit as measured by R2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R^2$$\end{document} values is exceptionally high in our cross-sectional tests ranging from a low of approximately 70% to a high of 98%. In several commonly used test assets, little or no residual error remains to be explained by other potential factors. By contrast, popular multifactors’ loadings rarely achieve a cross-sectional t-value exceeding 3, are much less consistently priced across different test assets, and have markedly lower R2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R^2$$\end{document} values in most test assets. Based on these extensive tests, we conclude that the ZCAPM represents a pathbreaking innovation in asset pricing for academic research and investment practice.]
Published: Mar 2, 2021
Keywords: Asset pricing; Beta risk; CAPM; Cross-sectional regression tests; Empirical ZCAPM; Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm; Fama and MacBeth; Fama and French; Industry portfolios; Microcap stocks; Multifactor models; Out-of-sample returns; Return dispersion; Securities investment; Signal variable; Stock market; Test assets; ZCAPM; Zero-beta CAPM; Zeta risk
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.