Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A New Model of Political ReasoningEmpirical Connection: The China Case

A New Model of Political Reasoning: Empirical Connection: The China Case [The chapter discusses how to test or apply the model of motivation-heuristics to empirical studies in general, connected to the China case. For example, it discusses how to collect and analyze materials (e.g. through discourse analysis) that reflect shared reasoning of the leading groups of a transpersonal entity, how to clarify the strategy-ideational relative weight in political decisions through exploring the connection logics of clusters contained in the form of reasoning outcome, how to check/convince correlations between “two degrees” (degree of survival-relativity and degree of self-persuasion) and the strategic-ideational relations in political outcomes; and how to define periodical division and how to capture main periodical key when more extended periods are involved.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A New Model of Political ReasoningEmpirical Connection: The China Case

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-new-model-of-political-reasoning-empirical-connection-the-china-case-LgQ58QnaCt

References (33)

Publisher
Springer Singapore
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
ISBN
978-981-33-4802-8
Pages
99 –111
DOI
10.1007/978-981-33-4803-5_6
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The chapter discusses how to test or apply the model of motivation-heuristics to empirical studies in general, connected to the China case. For example, it discusses how to collect and analyze materials (e.g. through discourse analysis) that reflect shared reasoning of the leading groups of a transpersonal entity, how to clarify the strategy-ideational relative weight in political decisions through exploring the connection logics of clusters contained in the form of reasoning outcome, how to check/convince correlations between “two degrees” (degree of survival-relativity and degree of self-persuasion) and the strategic-ideational relations in political outcomes; and how to define periodical division and how to capture main periodical key when more extended periods are involved.]

Published: Feb 17, 2021

Keywords: Discourse analysis; Shared reasoning; The leading groups; The connection logics of clusters; Correlations; Periodical division

There are no references for this article.