Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Non-Philosophical Theory of NatureNon-Theological Supplement

A Non-Philosophical Theory of Nature: Non-Theological Supplement [Before moving on to our construction of a unified theory of philosophical theology and ecology we must deal more directly with Meillassoux’s strong criticism of non-philosophy Remember that this criticism was directed at the threat of dogmatism in non-philosophy, specifically with regard to its claim to think from the Real. But the reason we have to deal with this strong criticism is not due to philosophical rules or on philosophical grounds. Rather this general axiomatic structure of non-philosophy, where the Real-One is foreclosed to thought and yet thought has relative autonomy before it as thought from the Real-One, is formally similar to theology. This is especially true of those theologies, like environmental theology, that aim to understand the relationship science and philosophy have toward reality. If this is true, and I show its validity later, then there is a question of why I am engaging in the non-philosophical project rather than simply a theological one. To answer that question I must first address Laruelle’s own work on religion, which has been the dominant material of Philosophy IV and the source of a number of central concepts such as heresy. But additionally I must also provide a theory of theology that locates its own particular self-sufficient character.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Non-Philosophical Theory of NatureNon-Theological Supplement

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-non-philosophical-theory-of-nature-non-theological-supplement-md0tmFoals

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013
ISBN
978-1-349-46328-2
Pages
95 –110
DOI
10.1057/9781137331977_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Before moving on to our construction of a unified theory of philosophical theology and ecology we must deal more directly with Meillassoux’s strong criticism of non-philosophy Remember that this criticism was directed at the threat of dogmatism in non-philosophy, specifically with regard to its claim to think from the Real. But the reason we have to deal with this strong criticism is not due to philosophical rules or on philosophical grounds. Rather this general axiomatic structure of non-philosophy, where the Real-One is foreclosed to thought and yet thought has relative autonomy before it as thought from the Real-One, is formally similar to theology. This is especially true of those theologies, like environmental theology, that aim to understand the relationship science and philosophy have toward reality. If this is true, and I show its validity later, then there is a question of why I am engaging in the non-philosophical project rather than simply a theological one. To answer that question I must first address Laruelle’s own work on religion, which has been the dominant material of Philosophy IV and the source of a number of central concepts such as heresy. But additionally I must also provide a theory of theology that locates its own particular self-sufficient character.]

Published: Oct 31, 2015

Keywords: Unify Theory; Radical Immanence; Religious Thought; Philosophical Theology; Negative Theology

There are no references for this article.