Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, Harris’s appeal to four versions of the anthropic principle are examined in light of four recently developed multiverse theories that some cosmologists consider effective for avoiding the conclusions of stronger anthropic reasoning. In Sect. 4.2, the weak anthropic principle and three associated selection effects are exemplified. The aim here is to elucidate Harris’s phenomenological means of avoiding certain multiverse theories. In Sect. 4.3, it is argued that a weaker version of Harris’s participatory anthropic reasoning can be revised and upheld by appealing to Bohmian quantum theory and phenomenology. Arguments to the effect that the final anthropic principle is irrelevant to Harris’s project are provided in Sect. 4.4, and in Sect. 4.5 these discussions culminate with the introduction of Harris’s (paradigmatic) teleological anthropic reasoning. This chapter concludes that dialectical holism avoids many arguments that have been utilized for refuting stronger AR, but Harris’s ontological conclusions must nevertheless confront numerous unforeseen challenges to be addressed in the following chapters.]
Published: Oct 13, 2021
Keywords: Anthropic principle; Multiverse theory; Dialectical holism; Teleology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.