Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem SurvivalMediumistic Communications

A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival: Mediumistic Communications [While out-of-body experiences (OBEs) and near-death experiences (NDEs) seem to provide data that support an account of consciousness that is amiable to the prospects of survival, more salient phenomena suggestive of survival would come in the form of indications that the consciousness of some persons who have actually died has persisted after their death. Phenomena associated with mediumship are one such class of potential evidence, for data collected from mediumship, if accepted at face value, suggest the continued existence of a person after biological death, sometimes long after death. In the prior chapter, I explained the importance of psychological criteria in identifying persons and therefore the importance of empirical phenomena that can be construed as offering evidence for the present existence of the psychological profile of some formerly living person. Many survivalists claim that mediumship provides evidence of this sort. In this chapter, I will look at prominent forms of mediumship—what survivalists regard as their evidentially significant features—and survey some of the more widely discussed cases. As in the prior chapter, I will conclude with an analytical description of the salient data drawn from these cases.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem SurvivalMediumistic Communications

Download PDF
32 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-philosophical-critique-of-empirical-arguments-for-postmortem-3wxaCGtFSS

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
ISBN
978-1-349-55255-9
Pages
72 –104
DOI
10.1057/9781137440945_4
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[While out-of-body experiences (OBEs) and near-death experiences (NDEs) seem to provide data that support an account of consciousness that is amiable to the prospects of survival, more salient phenomena suggestive of survival would come in the form of indications that the consciousness of some persons who have actually died has persisted after their death. Phenomena associated with mediumship are one such class of potential evidence, for data collected from mediumship, if accepted at face value, suggest the continued existence of a person after biological death, sometimes long after death. In the prior chapter, I explained the importance of psychological criteria in identifying persons and therefore the importance of empirical phenomena that can be construed as offering evidence for the present existence of the psychological profile of some formerly living person. Many survivalists claim that mediumship provides evidence of this sort. In this chapter, I will look at prominent forms of mediumship—what survivalists regard as their evidentially significant features—and survey some of the more widely discussed cases. As in the prior chapter, I will conclude with an analytical description of the salient data drawn from these cases.]

Published: Dec 21, 2015

Keywords: Mediumistic Communication; Mediumistic Claim; Survival Hypothesis; Empirical Argument; Deceased Person

There are no references for this article.