Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter examines the limited nature in which nationhood has featured in contemporary political theory and proposes this narrow view of the nation haunts current debates on the subject. Critics of nationality as a philosophical category perceive it as both a conceptually and a normatively problematic, labelling nationalism as collectivist, a political or anti-political and morally arbitrary. I argue that these criticisms, while partly valid, represent inadequate grasp or unreflective use of the concept of nationhood. Critics of nationhood have not sufficiently reflected on the specific trajectory of nationalism and its relationship with citizenship, sovereignty and justice.]
Published: Mar 24, 2017
Keywords: National Identity; Political Community; Direct Democracy; French Revolution; Penguin Book
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.