Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Poetics of EditingEditing and the Real: From Postmodern Idealism to New Materialism

A Poetics of Editing: Editing and the Real: From Postmodern Idealism to New Materialism [In this chapter, Greenberg evaluates the capacity of different interpretive frames to make sense of editing practice. In a panoramic view of intellectual history, the chapter tracks the shifting fortunes of ideas as they swing between idealism and materialism. In the idealist tradition, the focus is on social and radical constructivism, including approaches identified as critical theory. Greenberg argues that whatever their strengths, this tradition risks making the practitioner invisible or reductively symbolic. Some forms of constructivism are also marked by extreme relativism that can negate the importance of decision-making, which is central to editing as a lived practice. Responses to that tradition include Habermas’s communicative rationality, Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory and other examples of ‘the material turn’. The chapter ends by arguing for a multiframe approach, to discourage critical closure and maximise the visibility of practitioners.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Poetics of EditingEditing and the Real: From Postmodern Idealism to New Materialism

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-poetics-of-editing-editing-and-the-real-from-postmodern-idealism-to-CleWSyKVrZ

References (55)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
ISBN
978-3-319-92245-4
Pages
143 –173
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-92246-1_6
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In this chapter, Greenberg evaluates the capacity of different interpretive frames to make sense of editing practice. In a panoramic view of intellectual history, the chapter tracks the shifting fortunes of ideas as they swing between idealism and materialism. In the idealist tradition, the focus is on social and radical constructivism, including approaches identified as critical theory. Greenberg argues that whatever their strengths, this tradition risks making the practitioner invisible or reductively symbolic. Some forms of constructivism are also marked by extreme relativism that can negate the importance of decision-making, which is central to editing as a lived practice. Responses to that tradition include Habermas’s communicative rationality, Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory and other examples of ‘the material turn’. The chapter ends by arguing for a multiframe approach, to discourage critical closure and maximise the visibility of practitioners.]

Published: Sep 4, 2018

There are no references for this article.