Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, Greenberg evaluates the capacity of different interpretive frames to make sense of editing practice. In a panoramic view of intellectual history, the chapter tracks the shifting fortunes of ideas as they swing between idealism and materialism. In the idealist tradition, the focus is on social and radical constructivism, including approaches identified as critical theory. Greenberg argues that whatever their strengths, this tradition risks making the practitioner invisible or reductively symbolic. Some forms of constructivism are also marked by extreme relativism that can negate the importance of decision-making, which is central to editing as a lived practice. Responses to that tradition include Habermas’s communicative rationality, Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory and other examples of ‘the material turn’. The chapter ends by arguing for a multiframe approach, to discourage critical closure and maximise the visibility of practitioners.]
Published: Sep 4, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.