Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J Jaspers (2018)
10.7208/chicago/9780226561813.001.0001
C Tilly (2006)
10.7208/chicago/9780226803531.001.0001
J Jasper (2017)
10.1177/1368430216686405Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20
J Jasper (2006)
10.7208/chicago/9780226394749.001.0001
J Jasper (2004)
10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9
M Ganz (2000)
10.1086/210398American Journal of Sociology, 105
B Bringel (2012)
10.1590/2238-38752012v233Revista Sociologia & Antropologia, 2
J Wainwright (2010)
10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00397.xTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35
J Goodwin (1999)
10.1023/A:1021684610881Sociological Forum, 14
B Bringel (2016)
10.11606/issn.2319-0558.v3i3p474-489Revista Digital de Direito Administrativo, 3
M Ancelovici (2016)
10.1515/9789048525461
J Jasper (1997)
10.7208/chicago/9780226394961.001.0001
A Stetsenko (2020)
10.17759/chp.2020160202Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16
M Silva (2016)
10.1590/0103-335220162106Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 21
A Alonso (2017)
10.25091/S01013300201700040006Novos Estudos – CEBRAP, 37
D Gould (2009)
10.7208/chicago/9780226305318.001.0001
N Rose (2008)
10.1590/S0102-71822008000200002Psicol. Soc., 20
F Guattari (2008)
10.22409/re.v1i1.60Revista Ensaios, 7
A Alonso (2017)
10.1111/blar.12470Bulletin of Latin American Research, 36
R Romagnoli (2014)
10.1590/S0102-71822014000100006Psicologia & Sociedade, 26
L Wood (2020)
10.1080/08854300.2019.1675125Socialism and Democracy, 34
A Corti (2016)
10.1590/es0101-73302016167337Education and Society, 37
A Alonso (2012)
10.1590/2238-38752012v232Sociologia & Antropologia, 2
J Jasper (2011)
10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015Annual Review of Sociology, 37
[In this chapter, I argue that the concepts of repertoire, strategy, and institution are crucial to understanding the changes that have taken place in contentious politics in Brazil since the events of June 2013. I suggest that these concepts shed light on the overlapping meanings of the terms militância and ativismo. Specifically, the three concepts highlight important differences and tensions between the distinct political cultures associated with militância and ativismo. Repertoire describes protesters’ routines; strategy frames the required procedures for prompting and conducting collective action; and institution explains how changes in repertoire and strategy impact the way protesters think, feel, and act. To assemble these ideas into a comprehensive conceptual model, I demonstrate that each one is a medium in and through which the other takes shape. In sum, the model provides a psychopolitical standpoint from which to deepen our understanding of the transformations in the tactical rationales and forms of conduct that are reshaping collective action in Brazil.]
Published: Mar 7, 2023
Keywords: Brazil; Protest; June 2013; Militância; Militancy; Ativismo; Activism; Repertoire; Strategies; Institution; Political Psychology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.