Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Despite the controversy one could expect with a partial privatisation of water supply and sewage services, particularly in a ‘left-ish’ city like Berlin, the BWB privatisation was presented by the government as commonsensical and its implementation was, according to interviewees, relatively straightforward. Given the debates over the effects of privatisation and the controversy it has provoked, the presentation of privatisation as a panacea by governments is misleading. It is, then, necessary to move the analysis of the BWB partial privatisation beyond the claims made by policy-makers and focus on the actualities of making policies. Policies such as privatisation are not neutral and cannot be objectively ‘good’. They have to be constructed as such. A full understanding of policy-making and a shift to privatisation can only be achieved through an appreciation of the way in which normative and theoretical assumptions inform the making of facts in policy processes.]
Published: Oct 4, 2011
Keywords: Political System; Policy Proposal; Governmental Practice; Policy Analyst; Representative Democracy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.