Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Breeze (2011)
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND ITS CRITICSPragmatics, 21
Helen Winter, J. Moncrieff, E. Speed (2015)
“Because You’re Worth It”: A Discourse Analysis of the Gendered Rhetoric of the ADHD WomanQualitative Research in Psychology, 12
M. O’Reilly, K. Karim, J. Lester (2015)
Should Autism Be Classified as a Mental Illness/Disability? Evidence from Empirical Work
L. O'Dell, Hanna Rosqvist, Francisco Ortega, C. Brownlow, Michael Orsini (2016)
Critical autism studies: exploring epistemic dialogues and intersections, challenging dominant understandings of autismDisability & Society, 31
J. Potter, M. Wetherell (1987)
Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour
N. Fairclough (1992)
Discourse and social change
R. Wodak, Michael Meyer (2015)
Methods of Critical Discourse Studies
C. Brownlow, L. O'Dell (2006)
Constructing an autistic identity: AS voices online.Mental retardation, 44 5
C. Brownlow (2010)
Presenting the self: Negotiating a label of autismJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35
Claire Hewson, T. Buchanan (2013)
Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research
J. Davidson, Michael Orsini (2013)
Worlds of Autism: Across the Spectrum of Neurological Difference
I. Parker (2013)
Discourse Analysis: Dimensions of Critique in PsychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 10
K. Scior (2003)
Using discourse analysis to study the experiences of women with learning disabilitiesDisability & Society, 18
[In this chapter, Brownlow et al. seek to explore the positioning of individuals with autism within clinical consultation sessions. They draw upon the previous work of Edley (Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. Sage, 2001) in applying the principles of critical discursive psychology to a section of data drawn from a clinical consultation session. In doing this, they use the data to illustrate how the method of analysis works in practice. The chapter explores issues of power, dominant repertoires, positioning, and ideological dilemmas operating within the therapeutic context. Discussion of the strengths and limitations of the method of data analysis are considered, in addition to implications for researchers using the method.]
Published: Nov 17, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.