Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
CHAPTER IV ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF GOD There was probably never a time when belief in God was not challenged in one form or another, even if only to set the stage for its vindication, as in the Book of Job. However, it may be true to say that, for several centuries prior to the rise of the modern western civilization, the prevailing intellectual climate was noticeably suffused with belief in God in some form or other. The situation today is different. Belief in God is now a matter of keen contestation and this contestation is also characterized by a measure of sophistication. “The responsible skeptic, whether agnostic or atheist, is not concerned to deny that religious people have had certain experiences as a result of which they have become convinced of the reality of God. The skeptic believes, however, that these experiences can be adequately accounted for without postulating a God and by adopting instead a naturalistic interpretation of religion. Two of the most influential such interpretations will now be discussed.” The Sociological Theory of Religion The sociological theory of religion is of special interest in any discussion of the primal philosophy of religion, because it was
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: Sociological Theory; Primal Society; Oedipus Complex; John Hick; Intellectual Climate
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.