Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Künsch (1989)
The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary ObservationsAnnals of Statistics, 17
W. Madow, T. Anderson (1959)
An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Mike Rees, N. Cressie (1993)
5. Statistics for Spatial DataJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 156
H. Kelejian, I. Prucha (1998)
A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive DisturbancesThe Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17
C. Moler, C. Loan (1978)
Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years LaterSIAM Rev., 45
K. Ord (1975)
Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial InteractionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 70
D. Griffith (2004)
Extreme eigenfunctions of adjacency matrices for planar graphs employed in spatial analysesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 388
S. Holly, M. Pesaran, Takashi Yamagata (2006)
A Spatio-Temporal Model of House Prices in the UsUrban Economics & Regional Studies eJournal
G. Arbia (1989)
On second-order non-stationarity in two dimensional lattice processesComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 9
J. Besag (1974)
Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice SystemsJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 36
M. Sherman (1996)
Variance Estimation for Statistics Computed from Spatial Lattice DataJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 58
C. Varin, P. Vidoni (2008)
Pairwise Likelihood Inference for General State Space ModelsEconometric Reviews, 28
E. Dagum, S. Bordignon (2008)
Editorial: Special Issue on Statistical Inference on Time Series Stochastic and Deterministic DynamicsEconometric Reviews, 28
J. LeSage, R. Pace, D. Poirier (2007)
A matrix exponential spatial specificationJournal of Econometrics, 140
C. Varin, N. Reid, D. Firth (2011)
AN OVERVIEW OF COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD METHODSStatistica Sinica, 21
C. Varin (2008)
On composite marginal likelihoodsAStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92
K. Bell, N. Bockstael (2000)
Applying the Generalized-Moments Estimation Approach to Spatial Problems Involving Micro-Level DataReview of Economics and Statistics, 82
Tom Chiu, Tom Leonard, Kam-Wah Tsui (1996)
The Matrix-Logarithmic Covariance ModelJournal of the American Statistical Association, 91
G. Arbia (2014)
pairwise likelihood inference for spatial regressions estimated on very large datasetsspatial statistics, 7
Honglin Wang, E. Iglesias, J. Wooldridge (2013)
Partial maximum likelihood estimation of spatial probit modelsJournal of Econometrics, 172
R. Pace, J. LeSage (2004)
Chebyshev approximation of log-determinants of spatial weight matricesComput. Stat. Data Anal., 45
D. Griffith (2000)
Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analysesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 321
E. Gumbel (1960)
Bivariate Exponential DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 55
Oleg Smirnov, L. Anselin (2001)
Fast maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregression models: a characteristic polynomial approachComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 35
H. Joe, N. Reid, Peter Xuekun, D. Firth (2012)
Composite Likelihood Methods
G. Arbia, M. Bee, G. Espa (2013)
Testing Isotropy in Spatial Econometric ModelsSpatial Economic Analysis, 8
J. Heine, P. Malhotra (2002)
Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.Academic radiology, 9 3
G. Arbia (2006)
Spatial EconometricsEncyclopedia of Big Data
A. Solow (1985)
Bootstrapping correlated dataJournal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 17
[In Chapters 3 and 4 we have presented a series of estimation techniques for the general spatial econometric linear model which can basically be traced back to the two paradigms of the Maximum Likelihood and the Generalized Two-Stage Least Squares. In particular, when discussing the Maximum Likelihood approach we pointed out that the likelihood functions cannot be maximized analytically due to a high degree of non-linearity in the parameters and so we have to use numerical approximations. However, the likelihood function involves the calculation of the determinant of a matrix whose dimension depends on the sample size and that has to be evaluated repeatedly for each trial value of the spatial correlation parameter in a numerical search. If n is very large, as often happens in many empirical applications with a massive quantity of data, this operation may be highly demanding, if not prohibitive. The eigenvalues decomposition suggested by Ord (1975) and used for many years in the literature (see section 3.4.3) also has some limitations. Indeed, Kelejian and Prucha (1998) report that the computation of eigenvalues by standard subroutines for general non-symmetric matrices, are also approximate and may already be highly inaccurate for W matrices that are of the order 400-by-400, that is, for relatively small sample sizes.]
Published: Nov 9, 2015
Keywords: Directional Bias; Spatial Error Model; Spatial Econometric; Spatial Spillover; Lattice Grid
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.