Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[I introduced Chapter 1 of this dissertation with a series of questions asking what romantic love means to us, what it promises and how we cathect it as an ideal. In order to answer some of the questions that were raised in the Introduction to Chapter 1, ‘ways of seeing’ romantic love from a sociological, feminist, existentialist,1 Lacanian, cultural studies (poststructuralist), Freudian and object relations viewpoint were outlined. The guiding research question was whether these ways of seeing love2 led to a view of love as possible or impossible. It was argued that object relations psychoanalysis could contain both possible and impossible views of (a reconceptualised) love in contrast to the other concepts of love that were reviewed, which tended towards a one-sided concentration on love as either quite straightforwardly possible or as tormentingly impossible.3 However, the importance of a psychosocial way of seeing love was argued for, rather than a purely psychoanalytic or exclusively sociological explanation of love and its vicissitudes.]
Published: Nov 11, 2015
Keywords: Interpretive Approach; Romantic Love; Sociological Approach; Textual Tradition; Interpretive Method
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.