Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter will provide a brief overview of existentialist (Sartre, 1943), Lacanian (Sarup, 1992; Salecl, 1994/1998; Zizek, 1994) and poststructuralist (Barthes, 1978; Rylance, 1994) views of love. What we will see is that romantic love has been respectively deconstructed in the above theories as a metaphysical impossibility, a utilitarian demand (without reply) and as a thesaurus and endless festival of meaning. This chapter presents a theoretical critique of popular depictions of romantic love as either realisable or desirable. It does not aim to look at the work of each of these theorists in detail, because the aim is to provide a broad overview of their respective ways of seeing love as impossible or absurd.]
Published: Nov 11, 2015
Keywords: Romantic Love; Imaginary World; Love Relation; Courtly Love; Psychosocial Exploration
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.