A Reader’s Companion to the Confucian AnalectsTerms, Concept and Concept-Clusters
A Reader’s Companion to the Confucian Analects: Terms, Concept and Concept-Clusters
Rosemont, Henry
2015-11-05 00:00:00
[Every culture has a vocabulary denoting core concepts for describing, analyzing and evaluating human conduct, long ago as well as today. In contemporary English that vocabulary tends to cluster around the term “morals” and includes such other terms as “freedom,” “ought,” “rights,” “liberty,” “reason,” “obligation,” “choice,” “dilemma,” “evil,” “objective/subjective,” “right/wrong,” “individual,” “duty” and several related terms. Without these terms a discussion of moral issues could not take place. Unfortunately for any and all efforts to speed read the Analects for its moral insights, none of these terms clustered around the concept of “morals” has a close lexical equivalent in classical Chinese, and hence, in a very significant sense, Confucius should not be described as a “moral philosopher” in the contemporary English meaning of that expression, for imposing our current concept-cluster on his text will only eventuate in seeing him as a well-meaning preacher at best, as a muddled or hopelessly naive thinker at worst.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-reader-s-companion-to-the-confucian-analects-terms-concept-and-B58qCTgKQ4
A Reader’s Companion to the Confucian AnalectsTerms, Concept and Concept-Clusters
[Every culture has a vocabulary denoting core concepts for describing, analyzing and evaluating human conduct, long ago as well as today. In contemporary English that vocabulary tends to cluster around the term “morals” and includes such other terms as “freedom,” “ought,” “rights,” “liberty,” “reason,” “obligation,” “choice,” “dilemma,” “evil,” “objective/subjective,” “right/wrong,” “individual,” “duty” and several related terms. Without these terms a discussion of moral issues could not take place. Unfortunately for any and all efforts to speed read the Analects for its moral insights, none of these terms clustered around the concept of “morals” has a close lexical equivalent in classical Chinese, and hence, in a very significant sense, Confucius should not be described as a “moral philosopher” in the contemporary English meaning of that expression, for imposing our current concept-cluster on his text will only eventuate in seeing him as a well-meaning preacher at best, as a muddled or hopelessly naive thinker at worst.]
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.