Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In China, administrative reforms are not conducted in isolation but always closed linked to social and economic development. The issue of promoting the transformation of the economy by means of administrative reform has always been a keenly-watched matter. In particular, after the unfolding of the US financial crisis in 2008, just how to accelerate the transformation of the Chinese economy has become an important strategic question. In other words, as the world gradually enters the post-crisis age various nations appear to be taking their lessons from their respective experiences of the crisis. Although China had successfully countered the financial crisis, she is also facing the same issues. There are still lessons to be learned and examined. It is important that we learn from these experiences and lessons correctly so that we can step on the gas with the transformation of China’s economy and with further reforms. In this chapter, we look at the lessons we can learn from the so-called Three Strengths and Three Weaknesses, at the dual-engine strategy of economic development, and at using county-level reforms as an entry-point into government reform.]
Published: Jul 12, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.