Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, I use the two field explorative case studies in post-disaster Japan, i.e., local stakeholder dialogue on volcanic disaster management, and citizen dialogue with experts on radioactive waste, to propose relevant methods to develop a culture of dialogue that nurtures resilience, in the context of two complexities: complexity of scientific knowledge, and complexity of people’s lived experiences and value systems. The visions and methods described here are relevant to a resilience approach in that they focus on boundary and creating environment by linking scattered resources, looking at details and the whole. The methods proposed are intended to lower the walls, connecting the dots unconnected so far, to change the perceptions and lived experiences of boundary of partnership, in the context of local policy process and collaboration. Drawing the local case study, I argue that researchers could play significant roles in science-based policy process that engages local stakeholders and general public, changing the beliefs of boundary between experts, practitioners, and citizens. The case study also suggests that explicit treatment of pluralistic positions and views among researchers and stakeholders would reduce the barrier of quality learning and dialogue in science-based policy process.]
Published: Nov 10, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.