Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Review of Vascular Traits and Assessment Techniques, and Their Heritability

A Review of Vascular Traits and Assessment Techniques, and Their Heritability Various tools are available to assess atherosclerosis, arterial stiffening, and endothelial function. They offer utility in the assessment of hypertensive phenotypes, in cardiovascular risk prediction, and as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. We explore the relative influence of participant genetics, with reference to large-scale genomic studies, population-based cohorts, and candidate gene studies. We find heritability estimates highest for carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT 35–65%), followed by pulse wave velocity as a measure of arterial stiffness (26–43%), and flow mediated dilatation as a surrogate for endothelial function (14–39%); data were lacking for peripheral artery tonometry. We furthermore examine genes and polymorphisms relevant to each technique. We conclude that CIMT and pulse wave velocity dominate the existing evidence base, with fewer published genomic linkages for measures of endothelial function. We finally make recommendations regarding planning and reporting of data relating to vascular assessment techniques, particularly when genomic data are also available, to facilitate integration of these tools into cardiovascular disease research. Keywords: Heritability, Genetic, Vascular, Arterial stiffening, Endothelial, CIMT techniques and hypertensive phenotypes, including the 1 Introduction relative influence of participant sex and genetics. We Hypertension is a major risk factor for Cardiovascular Dis- explore this topic with reference to large scale genomic ease (CVD); in turn CVD is the underlying cause of more studies, population-based cohorts, and candidate gene than a quarter of deaths in the UK [1]. There are no vali - studies. dated tests that can identify early in the disease process which individuals will develop hypertension-mediated 1.1 Definitions for the Non‑expert organ damage. Dysfunctional vascular traits represent key Genome: complete set of genes in an organism includ- pathophysiological processes in the development of hyper- ing introns (non-coding sequences) and exons (coding tension and cardiovascular disease, with both inherited sequences). and reversible elements. These traits include stiffness of Genome-wide association study: entire genome surveyed the large arteries, microvascular abnormalities, endothelial for genetic variants occurring more frequently in cases dysfunction, and atherosclerosis, phenotypes often appar- than in controls. ent prior to established hypertension or organ damage. Candidate gene study: specify fewer variants of interest Hence the interest in measuring vascular function, and a priori, and aim to establish if a disease association can be in understanding the relationship between measurement confirmed. *Correspondence: Eleanor.Murray@ggc.nhs.scot.uk Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 62 Epigenetics: genetic modification without mutations regulated by many systems (sympathetic nervous system, of the DNA sequence; occur in normal development or endocrine, and local autoregulation), each with polygenic induced by environmental factors. influences [15]. Endothelial function can be assessed using Exome: complete set of exons present in an organism ultrasound of the brachial artery with ‘flow-mediated dila - which accounts for all the coding regions of genes present. tion’ (FMD), dilation predominantly mediated by nitric SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism—DNA sequence oxide release from endothelial cells. Alternatively, periph- variations with a single nucleotide (adenine, thymine, eral arterial tonometry (PAT), commonly quantified by cytosine, or guanine) in the genome sequence altered. the Endo-PAT2000 device (Itamar Medical) also assesses Common variants: SNPs with minor allele frequency microcirculatory and endothelial function by measuring (MAF) of greater than 1%, accounting for over 90% of arterial tone or ‘hyperaemic response’ in the fingertips in genetic variation between individuals. response to proximal occlusion. EndoPAT-2000 device Mendelian Randomization: method of using measured also generates an augmentation index adjusted to a heart variation in genes of known function to examine the causal rate of 75  bpm (AI@75), similar to PWA but derived effect of a modifiable exposure on disease. from peripheral vessels. Hence, these techniques not only reflect different aspects of the pathophysiology of hyper - 2 Assessment of Vascular Function and Disease tension and cardiovascular disease but may aid identifica - Cardiovascular outcome measures in clinical trials gener- tion of different hypertensive phenotypes [16]–[18]. They ally relate to coded events such as myocardial infarction or are also well accepted as being influenced by age, BP, and death; alternatively, research trials may employ surrogate sex; factors that should be accounted for when comparing markers such as vascular stiffness and endothelial dys - techniques. Less well defined are the effects of underlying function—early functional traits known to be predictors genetic differences, i.e. the inherited component, or ‘herit - of more advanced structural changes and development of ability’ of data pertaining to techniques measuring vascu- cardiovascular disease. Assessment techniques quantify- lar health. Genotypic effects on these vascular assessment ing such traits reflect different aspects of vascular health, tools are myriad, but key checkpoints where influence may assessed in the European Society of Cardiology Working be hypothesised include vascular endothelial cell sensitiv- group position paper [2]. First, carotid ultrasound to meas- ity to extracellular stimuli, intra-cellular signalling cas- ure intima-media thickness (CIMT) has clinical utility in cades, and effects on transcription, ultimately influencing diagnosing carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease [3]–[5], production of vasoactive substances, vascular tone, and but is also linearly associated with blood pressure (BP) [6] remodelling. and adds prognostic value in the prediction of cardiovascu- lar events and mortality, see Sect. 3.1 [7, 8]. Second, pulse 3 Genetics of Hypertension wave analysis (PWA), PWA-derived augmentation index Familial and twin studies estimate that the heritable com- (AIx), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) ponent of BP lies between 22 and 65% [19]–[22]. BP is a assess for arterial stiffness, a process characterised by func - complex trait with no single gene playing a dominant role; tional changes and structural remodelling within the arte- instead multiple genes demonstrate minor additive effects. rial wall, with associated fibrosis and calcification. These These genes encode for a variety of proteins, ion channels, measures of arterial stiffening are independent and reli - receptors, and enzymes involved in endocrine, cardiac, able predictors of hypertension, myocardial infarction and renal, vascular and neural systems that influence BP regu - stroke [9]–[11], with meta-analyses of individual patient lation. This complexity is illustrated by the heterogeneity data showing the alternative brachial-ankle PWV method of underlying pathology in the (rare) monogenic cases of also associated with cardiovascular complications [12], secondary hypertension, examples of which are discussed and stiffening of the carotid artery with incident stroke in Sect.  2.1.1. Other genes are identified only by genome [13]. The predictive strength of arterial stiffness is, how - wide association studies (GWAS); an illustrative example ever, greater in subjects with an established cardiovascular follows in Sect. 2.1.2. risk [14]. Finally, endothelial function refers to its’ ability to detect physical (shear stress) and biochemical signals, 3.1 Single Gene Disorders and respond through expression of surface molecules and Monogenic causes of hypertension are rare and mecha- production of vasoactive and inflammatory mediators. nisms varied. For example, children with homocystinuria Endothelial dysfunction precedes structural micro-circu- and familial hypercholesterolaemia develop premature latory changes. Hypertension can be both cause and con- atherosclerosis and early endothelial dysfunction [23]; in sequence of microcirculatory dysfunction, closely tied to AD glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism, chimeric peripheral vascular resistance, with vascular tone in turn genes encoding steroid 11ß-hydroxylase (CYP11B1) and C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 63 aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) lead to aldosterone reg- vascular techniques used to measure these hypertensive ulation by ACTH rather than angiotensin II [24, 25], salt phenotypes. and water retention, and elevation in BP [26]. Finally, AD hypertension with brachydactyly syndrome results from a 4 Carotid Intima‑Media Thickness gain of function mutation in PDE3A, encoding phospho-4.1 Heritability diesterase 3A and resulting in cerebral vascular anomalies A number of studies have reported heritability estimates and baroreceptors hypersensitivity [27]. For an in-depth for CIMT, though with disparate estimates (21 to 65%) review of monogenic hypertensive syndromes, we would despite similar adjustment for covariates, see Fig.  1 and highlight Burrello et al. [28]. Table  1 [38, 39]. Sacco et  al. for example report 65% her- itability in 100 Dominican families (1390 individuals, 61% 3.2 GWAS female, mean age 46  years) after adjustment for age, sex, GWAS have identified multitudes of genetic loci associ - smoking, and BMI [39]; Cecelja et al. estimate age-adjusted ated with BP, covered in-depth elsewhere [29]. For exam- heritability at 49% (95% CI 17–63%) in 762 females of the ple ATP2B1 encoding PMCA1, a plasma membrane Twins UK cohort with mean age 58 ± 9  years [40]; whilst ATPase expressed in vascular endothelium and involved only 35% heritability is reported by Sayed-Tabatabaei et al. in calcium pumping from the cytosol to the extracellu- [41] in their assessment of 930 individuals connected in a lar compartment. GWAS can, however, be susceptible to single pedigree from an isolated population (participants false positive associations if statistical analysis lacks rigour, of the Erasmus Rucphen Family study). if the panel fails to reflect genomic variation, or the study lacks statistical power; points to remain cognizant of.4.2 Genes GWAS identifies numerous genetic loci as having possible 3.3 Epigenetics significance, and studies of candidate genes approximat - Processes of epigenetic modification include methylation, ing to these loci have also been widely reported (Table 2); post-translational histone modification, and small non- 16 of the 32 identified (50%) also have evidence of asso - coding RNAs. HSD11B2 gene promoter methylation for ciation with BP traits. Figure  2 demonstrates that many example has been associated with hypertension onset [30, genes have a role vascular remodelling, such as MMP9 31]; acetylation meanwhile promotes gene transcription of [42] encoding a gelatinase targeting type IV collagen and NOS3 (eNOS) and other genes affecting vascular tone and gelatin; CXCL12 involved in endothelial and epithelial cell salt and water homeostasis [32, 33]. Finally, small non-cod- proliferation and migration [43]; and VCAN [44] which ing RNAs (miRNA) may conversely downregulate genes encodes chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (extracellular by binding the corresponding mRNA resulting in repres- matrix components), thus regulates cell proliferation, dif- sion of translation [33]. Population-based studies further ferentiation, and survival [45]. support the role of epigenetics in hypertension [34]. 4.3 Interactions 3.4 S ex and BP Genetics Other genes demonstrate the importance of gene-by-envi- The male–female difference in BP, vascular traits, and ronment interactions in determining CIMT, for example CVD is complex. Mediating factors include X and Y chro- MCPH1 encodes a damage response protein regulating mosome differences, sex-hormone influences, renin– cell cycle [44]. Similarly, gene–gene interactions are appar- angiotensin–aldosterone system divergence [35], societal ent, for example genes involved in cholesterol biology and and behavioral impacts, and even epigenetic differences, inflammation where high-density lipoprotein composition with females receiving genetic imprints from each parent’s is altered in an inflammatory state, with apolipoprotein- X chromosome, random X inactivation leading to fur- A-I and –A-II displaced by Serum amyloid A (SAA). SAA ther genetic heterogeneity. Gene-by-sex interactions, and SNPs rs2468844 and rs12218 alter binding affinity of SAA age (menopause)-dependent effects further complicate proteins [46, 47], with implications for reverse cholesterol interpretation. transport, CIMT, plaque formation [48], and plaque stabil- ity [49]. 3.5 Summary Bringing together the evidence of different phenotypes of 5 Vascular Stiffness: Pulse Wave Analysis and Pulse hypertension [16–18, 36, 37], determined by pathophysi- Wave Velocity ology but characterised by the aforementioned vascular 5.1 Heritability traits; and considering the exponentially increasing data Genes are estimated to account from 26 to 43% of the regarding hypertension risk alleles; it becomes impor- variability in vascular stiffness as measured by PWV (see tant to explore the genotypic and sex associations with Table  1, Fig.  1), with data derived from both population Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 64 Sacco Cecelja Ge 40 Mitchell Zhao Fox Cecelja Jarr Sayed-Tabatabaei Sayed-Tabatabaei Jarr North Benjamin 0246 81012141618 CIMT es mates in orange, PWV/PWA blue, PAT no data, FMD green Fig. 1 Evidence regarding heritability of techniques assessing vascular function and twin studies [40, 41, 52, 53]. For example, the Georgia randomization data supporting causality, with genetic Cardiovascular Twin Study of 388 twins (41% black; 49% predisposition of arterial stiffness preceding hypertension male) aged 12–30  years; report 53% (42–62%) heritabil- [85]. ity for dorsalis pedis (foot) PWV [53], with no sex or race differences; additionally, the aforementioned Twins UK 5.3 Interactions cohort of 762 females, mean age 58 ± 9 report heritability Fifteen of the 24 genes (62.5%) implicated in arterial stiff - estimate of 38% (95% CI 16–63%) after adjustment, with ness have evidence of BP associations, see Table  2. Many annual progression interestingly demonstrating higher candidate gene polymorphisms studied in greater detail adjusted heritability estimates of 55% (31–64%) over relate to the renin angiotensin aldosterone system; in par- 5 years follow-up [40]. ticular angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene poly- morphisms are known to influence vascular tone, fibrosis, 5.2 Genes and ultimately arterial stiffness, though with discordant Many studies of the genetics of arterial stiffness focus on results between healthy, diabetic, and hypertensive popu- parameters other than PWV, such as pulse pressure and lations, despite adjustments for demographic and lifestyle forward and reflected wave amplitude, covered in detail factors [104, 106, 142], suggesting either an additional elsewhere [142, 143]. Looking specifically at PWV as the interaction or confounding factor is involved. Similarly, most commonly used technique, GWAS of 644 individu- the A1166C polymorphism of angiotensin II type 1 recep- als involved in the Framingham Heart Study did not find tor gene (AGTR1) was associated with arterial stiffness any variants achieving genome wide significance in the in hypertensive participants [103, 108], but not among primary analysis [91], despite the Mitchell et  al.study of normotensive participants of the same study, nor the Rot- 2127 participants (mean age of 60 years, 57% female) also terdam Study population [103, 110]. Study participant derived from the Framingham cohort reporting moderate age needs to be considered in such publications as com- heritability for PWV (h = 0.40), with suggestive linkage bined effects may be apparent, e.g. C allele carriers show - regions in chromosomes 2, 7, 13, and 15 [52]. Informed by ing increased PWV, but only beyond 55 years of age [103], GWAS, and based on UK Biobank data, Zekavat et al. [85] though the Rotterdam study population was over 55 years generated a six variant polygenic arterial stiffness score, of age but still did not support the association. Addition- showing a relationship with SBP and DBP, and Mendelian ally, heterogeneous methods of estimating arterial stiffness Percent heritability C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 65 Table 1 Evidence regarding heritability of techniques assessing vascular function CIMT Heritability: 35–65% BP considerations of study 65% (95% CI 60–70%): 100 Dominican families after adjustment for age, 40% had hypertension, which met inclusion criteria as a covariate for CIMT. sex, smoking, and BMI. Sacco 2009 [39] A chromosome 14q-hypertension interaction suggested for CIMT. Sacco 2009 [39] 49% (95% CI 17–63%) adjusted for age: 762 females ( Twins UK cohort), Progression of CIMT was negatively associated with treatment for hyperten- mean age 58 ± 9 years; average follow up 4.9 years; heritability of annual sion. Cecelja 2018 [40] progression of CIMT only 8% (95% CI 0–36%). Cecelja 2018 [40] 35% ± 8 (after adjustment; P < 0.001): 930 individuals connected in a Heritability 41% unadjusted, 35% adjusted for BP (and other factors), sug- single pedigree from an isolated population (Erasmus Rucphen Family gesting pleiotropic genes. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] cohort); mean age females 51, males 54 yrs. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] 38% ± 6 heritability, adjusted for multiple covariates; n = 906 men, 980 40% of males and 36% of females had hypertension. Estimated age- and women (mean age 57 years) from 586 extended families of the Framing- sex-adjusted heritability (c.f. the multivariable-adjusted) was 44% Fox 2003 ham Ospr ff ing cohort. Fox 2003 [50] [50] 21% ± 6 after adjustment for multiple covariates; n = 950 American Indi- Hypertension did not reach significance as a covariate for CIMT. Proportion ans of the Strong Heart Study (SHS); ≈30% with diabetes and hyperten- of variance due to covariates: 46%. North 2002 [38] sion; mean ages of different communities 41 to 44 years. North 2002 [38] 36%: 74 male twin pairs, 20 MZ, aged 42 to 69, one twin migrating to IMT correlated with S (r = 0.24, P = 0.004). Jartti 2002 [51] Sweden; IMT values also correlated between twin pairs (rMZ = 0.64, P = 0.002; rDZ = 0.46, P = 0.0006). Jartti 2002 [51] PWV and PWA Heritability: 26–43% BP considerations of study 26% ± 8 (after adjustment, P < 0.001) for PWV: n = 930; from an isolated Heritability 36% unadjusted, 26% adjusted for BP (and other factors), sug- population (Erasmus Rucphen Family); mean age females 51, males 54 yrs. gesting pleiotropic genes. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] 40% ± 9 among 1480 participants representing 817 pedigrees in the Analysed PWV separately from BP, and used additional linkage sample: the Framingham Study offspring cohort. Mean age 60 ± 10 years. Variance results mapped to separate genomic locations with credible candidate components linkage analysis identified chromosomes 2, 7, 13, and 15 for genes, suggesting distinct genetic determinants. Mitchell 2005 [52] PWV. Mitchell 2005 [52] 38% (95% CI 16–63%) adjusted: 762 females ( Twins UK cohort), mean age Demonstrate association between progression in PWV and longitudinal BP, 58 ± 9 years; average follow up 4.9 years; heritability of annual progression though not directionality. Cecelja 2018 [40] of PWV 55% (31–64%). Cecelja 2018 [40] 43% (95% CI 30–54%) / 53% (95% CI 42–62%) for radial / foot PWV respec- Overlap with genes influencing DBP. Ge 2007 [53] tively. No ethnicity or gender differences in estimates. 41% black; 49% male; aged 12–30 (mean 17.7 ± 3.3) years; n = 388, twins: 89 pairs MZ, 105 pairs DZ. Ge 2007 Georgia Cardiovascular Twin Study [53] PAT heritability: unknown BP considerations of study No published heritability estimates identified; though race, sex, and age influ- N/A ence EndoPAT results. Mulukutla 2010; Schnabel, 2011 [54, 55] FMD heritability: 14–39% BP considerations of study 14%: n = 883, 53% women; mean age 61; adjusting for stepwise model Concluded SBP is an important correlate of FMD; but not directionality or covariates, estimated heritability of brachial artery baseline diameter was whether associated through a third factor. Benjamin 2004 [56] 33 ± 7%, and FMD% was 14 ± 6%, with age-gender interaction (P = 0.01). Benjamin 2004 [56] 24%: 74 male twin pairs, 20 MZ, aged 42–69, one twin migrat- FMD correlated with SBP: r = − 0.21 (P = 0.01), and DBP: r = − 0.17 ing to Sweden; FMD did not correlate between twins, (rMZ = 0.23, (P = 0.04). Jartti 2002 [51] P = 0.34; rDZ = 0.11, P = 0.43), suggesting modest genetic component; h2 = 2 × (0.23 − 0.11) = 0.24. Jartti 2002 [51] 39% (95% CI 18–56%): 94 male twin pairs, mean age 55 ± 2.8 years; adjusted Unadjusted correlation of FMD and SBP: r = − 0.05 (P = 0.15) and DBP: for age, cholesterol, DBP, and body mass index. Zhao 2007 [57] r = − 0.08 (P = 0.08), P values corrected using generalized estimating equation. Zhao 2007 [57] CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, FMD flow-mediated dilatation, PWA pulse-wave analysis, PWV pulse-wave velocity, PAT peripheral arterial tone, BP blood pressure, MZ monozygous, DZ dizygous, N/A not applicable (no evidence of BP association) limit comparisons of studies. Mayer et al. for example find than for carotid-brachial PWV, consistent with Salvi et al. AGTR1 polymorphism significant in femoral-popliteal reporting carotid-femoral techniques are more reliable PWV but not carotid-femoral [108]; Levy et al. conversely [91, 144]. This emphasises the need for standardized tech - report greater heritability estimates for carotid-femoral nique, with the consensus now favouring carotid-femoral Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 66 Table 2 Gene polymorphisms relating to techniques measuring vascular health, with consideration of sex differences and heritability estimates CIMT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association ATG10—E2-like enzyme involved in 2 ubiquitin-like modifications essen- GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A tial for autophagosome formation Strawbridge 2020 [44] RPS23—encodes a ribosomal protein Strawbridge 2020[44] GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A ATP6AP1L—ATPase H + Transporting Accessory Protein 1 Like, a protein GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A coding gene; Strawbridge 2020[44] MIR8055 and MIR4693—RNA Genes affiliated with the miRNA class; GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A Strawbridge 2020 [44] CBFA2T3—encodes a myeloid translocation gene family member which GWAS (UK Biobank) Larsson 2013 [58] interact to repress transcription; Strawbridge 2020 [44] CYP2A6 and CYP2A7- encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 GWAS (UK Biobank) Liu 2013 [59] superfamily of enzymes; Strawbridge 2020 [44] APOE E2 allele encodes a major apoprotein of the chylomicron. Natara- Meta-analysis of exome-WAS & GWAS (CHARGE) N/A jan 2016; Bis 2011; Strawbridge 2020. [44, 60, 61] BCAM—basal cell adhesion molecule; encodes Lutheran blood group Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A glycoprotein, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and a receptor for laminin Starwbridge 2020, Bis 2011 [44, 61] ZHX2—acts as a transcriptional repressor, rs11781551 associated with Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A lower CIMT; Bis 2011 [61] APOC1—expressed primarily in the liver, activated when monocytes Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A differentiate into macrophages Bis 2011 [61] PINX1—Microtubule-binding protein essential for chromosome segrega- Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Feitosa 2018 [62] tion, 1rs6601530 copy number associated with higher CIMT; Bis 2011 [61] PIK3CG—phosphorylate inositol lipids involved in immune response, Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Carnevale 2012 [64] rs17398575 associated with 18% increased odds of plaque Bis 2011 [61], not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] EDNRA—encodes the receptor for endothelin-1; role in vasoconstriction; Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Hoffman 2017 [65] rs1878406 associated with 22% increased odds of plaque; Bis 2011[61]; not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] ADAMTS7—a member of the ADAMTS family, a disintegrin and metal- GWAS (Dutch and Belgian Lung Cancer Screen- Warren 2017 [66], Wirtwein 2017 [68] loproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; van Setten et al., 2013 [67], ing population) not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] THBS2—thrombospondin 2, a disulfide-linked homotrimeric glycopro - GWAS (GeneQuest, USA) Oguri 2009 [66] tein that mediates cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions; McCarthy 2004 [69] CFDP1—protein coding gene, may play a role during embryogenesis; GWAS (IMPROVE population, European) The UK Biobank Cardio-metabolic Traits Consortium Blood Pressure Work- Gertow, 2012 [70] ing Group [66] SLC17A2—involved in phosphate transport into cells; rs17526722 associ- GWAS (RA patients) N/A ated with lower CIMT in Mexican-Americans. Arya 2018 [71] PPCDC—necessary for biosynthesis of coenzyme A; rs1867148 associ- GWAS (RA patients) Nandakumar 2019 [72] ated with lower CIMT in European-Americans; Arya 2018 [71] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 67 Table 2 (continued) CIMT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association PNPT1—RNA-binding protein involved in multiple processes e.g. import- GWAS (Erasmus Rucphen Family) Ali 2019 [74] ing RNA into mitochondria. Vojinovic 2018 [73] NOS3—nitric oxide has a role in vascular tone; Asp/Asp genotype dem- Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri [77], and others onstrated greater CIMT (P = 0.0002) Paradossi 2004 [75] SAA1 (rs12218) and SSA2 (rs2468844)—acute phase protein, associated Candidate gene study N/A with CIMT in healthy Chinese population Xie 2010[48] MMP9—involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix; associated Candidate gene study Dhingra 2016 [78] with internal carotid but not common carotid artery IMT Armstrong 2007[42], MMP3—involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix; relationship Candidate gene study Armstrong 2007 [42] Beilby 2005 [79] between increasing copy number and CIMT Armstrong 2007[42] TIMP3—inactivates metalloproteinases; shows relationship between Candidate gene study Armstrong 2007 [42] increasing copy number and CIMT. Armstrong 2007[42] CXCL12—arterial remodeling and thickening, rs1746048 associated with Candidate gene study Liu 2018 [80] IMT. Zabalza 2015[43] WDR12—involved in cell cycle/proliferation, signal transduction and Candidate gene study Wirtwein 2017 [68] gene regulation; inverse association with CIMT; Zabalza 2015 [43] CYBA encodes p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase. C242T Candidate gene study N/A polymorphism was a predictor of internal CIMT following multivariable adjustment (b-coefficient − 0.119, p = 0.011). Lambrinoudaki 2018[81] GCKR—product is a regulatory protein that inhibits glucokinase in liver Candidate gene study N/A and pancreatic islet cells; rs780094 associated with carotid plaque in the American Indian but not European-, African-, or Mexican–American populations Zhang 2013[82] ADAM33—transmembrane protein, role in inflammation and regenera- Candidate gene study N/A tion; rs514174 associated with CIMT; Zhang 2019[83] TRAF1—adapter molecule that regulates the activation of NF-kappa-B Linkage analysis N/A and JNK, Heßler 2016[84] SMOC-1—glycoprotein mediating cell–matrix interactions Sacco 2009 Linkage analysis N/A [39] FBLN5—secreted protein involved in cell adhesion Sacco 2009 [39] Linkage analysis N/A CIMT Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association VCAN—female-specific locus; encodes a chondroitin sulfate proteogly- GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A can of the adventitia and intima. Strawbridge 2020 [44] MCPH1—DNA damage response protein Starwbridge 2020 [44] GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association TEX41 (rs1006923), testis expressed 41 RNA gene. Zekavat 2019; Fung GWAS (UK BioBank) Zekavat 2019 included causal inference analyses with BP [85]. Also Warren 2019[85, 86] 2017 [66] Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 68 Table 2 (continued) PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association FOXO1 (rs7331212)—role in T lymphocyte function and cell cycle regula- GWAS (UK BioBank) Animal model Qi 2014 [87] tion including osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Zekavat 2019, Fung 2019 [85, 86] MRVI1 (rs10840457), synonym: IRAG. Role as regulator of IP3-induced GWAS (UK BioBank) Animal model association with BP: Desch 2010 [88]; association not calcium release in platelet activation and NO-dependent smooth muscle evidenced in human studies relaxation. Fung 2019[86] COL4A1 and COL4A2 (rs3742207, rs9521719, rs872588)—type 4 collagen GWAS (UK BioBank and SardiNIA) N/A and associated with arterial stiffness (by PulseTrace PCA2); Zekavat 2019 and Fung 2019 [85, 86]; Tarasov 2009 [89] TCF20 (rs55906806): transcription factor recognises platelet-derived GWAS (UK BioBank) N/A growth factor-responsive element in MMP3 promoter. Zekavat 2019 and Fung 2019[85, 86] C1orf21 (rs1930290): chromosome 1 open reading frame. Fung 2019 [86] GWAS (UK BioBank) Evangelou 2018 [90]; Giri 2018 [77] MAGI1 (rs1495448): membrane associated guanylate kinase i.e. scaffold- GWAS (SardiNIA) Levy 2007 [91] ing protein; associated with PWV. Tarasov 2009 [89] BCL11B (rs7152623) role in immune regulation; linked to carotid-femoral Meta-analysis of 9 European ancestry GWAS Association with nocturnal dipping (GENRES (n = 204), DYNAMIC (n = 183) PWV and CVD. Mitchell 2012[92] and DILGOM cohorts (n = 180) Rimpelä 2018 [93] IL6 (pro-inflammatory cytokine). Mitchell 2005 [52](Framingham Study GWAS (Framingham) N/A offspring cohort, n = 1480) PHACTR1 (rs9349379) regulates cytoskeleton; G allele linked to decreased GWAS (UK BioBank) Gupta 2017,n = 38,817 (UK BioBank) [94] arterial stiffness (PulseTrace PCA2) Zekavat 2019[85] IGF1R (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) complex effects on vas- GWAS (Framingham) Schutte 2014 [95] culature including cellular proliferation, vasodilation via NO, and other endothelial functions. Mitchell 2005 [52] MEF2A (myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2A), DNA-binding transcrip - GWAS (Framingham) Evangelou 2018 [90]; Giri 2018 [77] tion factor, activates growth factor and stress-induced genes. Mitchell 2005[52] CHSY1 (chondroitin synthase 1), role in biosynthesis of chondroitin GWAS (Framingham) N/A sulfate, a glycosaminoglycan required for cell proliferation and morpho- genesis. Mitchell 2005[52] PACE4 (PCSK6) and FURIN, encodes a protease with multiple substrates GWAS (Framingham) Li 2004 [96]; Ehret 2011 [97] including pro-hormones, growth factors and von Willebrand factor; Mitchell 2005 [52] ADD2 (β-adducin), encode subunits of membrane skeletal proteins. GWAS (Framingham) N/A Mitchell 2005[52] TACR1 (tachykinin/neurokinin-1 receptor) encodes receptor for and GWAS (Framingham) N/A mediates metabolism of tachykinin substance P. Mitchell 2005[52] ADRA2B (beta adrenergic receptor) mediate catecholamine-induced inhi- GWAS (Framingham) N/A bition of adenylate cyclase through G proteins; Mitchell 2005[52] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 69 Table 2 (continued) PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association NOS3 rs1799983 related to central pulse pressure and forward wave Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri 2018 [77] and others amplitude parameters of PWA) in females only. Mitchell 2007[98]) TXNIP (rs7212) G allele associated with higher PWV values; functions as Candidate gene study (Brazilian cohort) N/A sensor for biomechanical and oxidative stress. Alvim 2011[99] (Brazilian cohort, n = 1518) COL1A1 polymorphisms—collagen type 1A deposition in arterial compli- Candidate gene study N/A ance. Brull 2001[100] (Young Hearts Project, UK, N = 489) ETAR (Endothelin-A and -B receptor, synonym EDNRA); endothelin being Candidate gene study Hoffman et l 2016 [65] a vasoconstrictor; gene variants influenced PWV. Lajemi 2001[101] (n = 528, untreated hypertensive Europeans) ACE I/D (rs4340)—role in BP regulation and electrolyte balance through Candidate gene studies Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others hydrolyzing angiotensin I, influence on arterial stiffness. Heterogeneous findings regarding implications of D allele. Mattace- Raso 2004; Benetos 1996; Dima 2008; Taniwaki 1999; Lajemi 2001; Benetos 1995; Gardier 2004; Mayer 2008[102]–[109] AGTR1 (AT II type 1 receptor)—AT II acts as a vasoconstrictor and regu- Candidate gene studies Numerous, see www. ensem bl. org; e.g. Bonnardeaux 1994 [112] lates aldosterone; positive association seen with PWV in hypertensive population. Benetos 1996, Lameji 2001; Bozec 2004; Gardier 2004; Mayer 2008. Association not supported by Sie 2009[103, 105, 107, 108, 110, 111] AGT (angiotensinogen) gene, M235T polymorphism associated with arte- Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others rial stiffness in 98 untreated hypertensive individuals. Bozec 2004[111] PWV and PWA Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association FBN1 (Fibrillin-1) 2/3 genotype associated with higher PWA Candidate gene study Malm 2020 [114]; Medley 2002 [115] AIx and BP in females only. Malm 2020[114] (n = 315 hyperten- sive elderly subjects); Medley 2002[115] (n = 145) PAT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association CSK—cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, role in angiotensin II-medi- GWAS (KARE) Hong 2009 [116] ated vascular smooth muscle contraction (Hong 2010)[116] NOS3 (eNOS)—produces nitric oxide which is implicated in Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Giri 2018 [77] and others vascular smooth muscle relaxation; (Burghardt 2017)[117] APOE3/E4—a protein which is a component of lipoprotein Candidate gene study N/A (Korsakova 2018)[118] ACE—converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II, resulting in Candidate gene study Montrezol 2019 [119]; Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and increased vasoconstrictor activity; (Korsakova 2018)[118] others SPHK 1—modulates Ang II-dependent vascular dysfunction; Animal model/human data Pietro 2020 [121] (animal and human data) (Siedlinski et at., 2017)[120] ADORA1—receptor for adenosine, activity of this receptor is Linkage analysis Evangelou 2018 [90] mediated by G proteins which inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Yoshino 2016)[122] Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 70 Table 2 (continued) PAT Theorised genes, but data lacking Design Evidence of BP association SH2B3—LNK, lymphocyte-specific adaptor protein; endothelial GWAS (Global BPgen & CHARGE consortiums) Dale 2016 [125]; Newton-Cheh 2009 [123], Ference 2014 [126] cell function and vascular regeneration, though not specifi- cally reported in EndoPAT (Newton-Cheh 2009; McMaster 2014 animal model)[123, 124] PAT Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association ADORA3 strongest associations in women (member of the Linkage analysis N/A adenosine receptor group of G-protein-coupled receptors) (Yoshino 2016)[122] LPA strongest associations in women (protein encoded by this Linkage analysis Smyth 2008 [127], Wirtwein 2017 [68] gene is a serine proteinase that inhibits the activity of tissue-type plasminogen activator I) (Yoshino 2016)[122] KIF6 strongest associations in men (encodes a member of a Linkage analysis N/A family of molecular motors which are involved in intracellular transport of protein complexes) (Yoshino 2016)[122] NFKB1 strongest associations in men (a rapidly acting primary Linkage analysis N/A transcription factor found in all cell types) (Yoshino 2016)[122] FMD Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association PHACTR1 (rs9349379): encoded protein binds actin and Candidate gene study Gu 2020 [128]; Zhang 2012 [129] regulates reorganization of actin cytoskeleton, also influences vascular endothelin-1 gene expression; G allele associated with decreased FMD. Gupta 2017, n = 16,662, aggregated from six cohorts[94] NOS3 ( eNOS): Glu298 → Asp polymorphism—Nitric oxide has Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri 2018 [77] and a role in vascular tone; associated with FMD Paradossi 2004, others n = 118; and Ingelsson 2008, n = 959 [75, 130] CD36 (rs3211938): integral membrane protein expressed by Candidate gene study Xueyan 2013 [132] many cell types, imports fatty acids and is a class B scavenger receptor. G allele impairs FMD after adjusting for differences in weight. Shibao 2016; 103 African American females [131] AT1R (synonym AGTR1): AT II acts as a vasoconstrictor and regu- Candidate gene study Numerous, see www. ensem bl. org; e.g. Bonnardeaux 1994 [112] lates aldosterone, hence blood volume: FMD reduced in C allele carriers Li et al. 2015, and Akpinar et al., 2014, n = 255 [133] CYBA (C242T polymorphism) encodes p22phox, a component Candidate gene study N/A of NADPH oxidase. FMD impaired in CC genotype; and T allele associated with higher FMD in hypertensive individuals. Fan et al. 2007, n = 2058; Rafiq 2014, n = 140; Lambrinoudaki 2018 n = 70 [81, 134, 135] APOE: FMD associated with E4 allele in stepwise regression Candidate gene study N/A analysis. Guangda 2003, n = 255 with diabetes [136] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 71 Table 2 (continued) FMD Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association NFKB1: encoding NFKB protein, a transcription regulator; Candidate gene study N/A reduced reactive forearm blood flow identified in DD genotype; Park 2007, n = 47 PDE3A: Phosphodiesterases regulate endothelial function and Linkage analysis Associated with hypertension and brachydactyly syndrome. Maass smooth muscle contraction through role in the NO/cGMP 2015 [138]; Luft 2019 [139] pathway. Traylor 2020; ALSPAC (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; n = 5214, integrated with MEGASTROKE: n = 60,341) [137] FMD Theorised genes, but data lacking or no association Design Evidence of BP association found SH2B3 (LNK—lymphocyte-specific adaptor protein)—endothe - GWAS (Global BPgen and CHARGE consortiums) Levy 2009 [140]; Ference 2014 [126], Hoffman 2016 [65]; Ehret lial cell function and vascular regeneration, not specifically 2016 [113] and others reported in FMD. Newton-Cheh 2009, also McMaster 2014 [123] ACE gene: mostly endothelial-bound, role in BP regulation and Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others electrolyte balance through hydrolyzing angiotensin I; no effect on FMD. Akpinar 2014 and Celermajer 1994 [133, 141] FMD Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association Sex-specific multivariable models estimated similar effects GWAS (Global BPgen and CHARGE consortiums) Levy 2009 [140]; Ference 2014 [126], Hoffman 2016 [65]; Ehret of age on baseline artery diameter and FMD in mm for both 2016 [113] and others sexes. However,% FMD demonstrated age-gender interaction (P = 0.01), age effect being − 0.5 for men and − 0.7 for women. Benjamin 2004 [56] ACE gene: mostly endothelial-bound, role in BP regulation and N/A electrolyte balance through hydrolyzing angiotensin I; no effect on FMD. Akpinar 2014 and Celermajer 1994 [133, 141] CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, FMD flow-mediated dilatation, PWA pulse-wave analysis, PWV pulse-wave velocity, PAT peripheral arterial tone; BP, blood pressure, N/A not applicable (no evidence of BP association) Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 72 CIMT Lipids CYBA MCPH1 APOE E2 ATG10 SSA1 PINX1 ADAM33 Inflammation APOC1 TRAF1 SMOC1 MMP9 PIK3CG FBLN5 MMP3 VCAN WDR12 ADAMTS7 BP BCAM TIMP3 RPS23 CFDP1 CXCL12 Remodelling ATP6AP1L CBFA2T3 PINX CYP2A6/A7 EDNRA Cell cycle MIR8055 PNPT1 NOS3 MIR4693 ZHX2 GCKR Vasoactive THBS2 SCL17A2 Other PPCDC Arterial CHSY1 Stiffness COL4A1/2 MAGI1 IL6 COL1A1 Remodelling Inflammation PHACTR1 FOXO1 FBN1 BCL11B ILGF1R ACE I AGT AGTR1 BP ADRA2B IRAG PACE4 NOS3 Endothelial Cell cycle ETAR MEF2A FURIN function TCF20 Vasoactive TEX41 C1orf21 CYBA TXNIP SH2B3 Other APOE3/E4 TACR1 NFKB1 Inflammation Lipids PHACTR1 LPA CD36 Remodelling BP ADORA1 SPHK1 ADORA3 ACE CSK AT1R NOS3 Cell cycle PDE3A Vasoactive KIF6 Other Fig. 2 Gene polymorphisms relating to techniques measuring vascular health, with genes grouped according to function. Based on data in Table 2 C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 73 PWV [145]. Finally, the importance of ancestry when effect size and significant interaction with other genes and extrapolating data is highlighted by the concordance of environmental factors [151]. Further elements of the NO results derived from a common population e.g. Zekavat system implicated include PDE3A, a phosphodiesterase et al. and Fung et al. reporting UK BioBank data [85, 86], with a role in the NO/cGMP pathway. and discordant results in candidate genes and heritability Other genes have more obscure associations, such as estimates across disparate populations [52, 110]. PHACTR1 with a role in actin re-organisation but also possibly regulating vasoconstriction via endothelin-1 gene 6 Endothelial Function: Flow Mediated Dilatation expression [94]; NFKB1 encoding a protein with diverse and Peripheral Arterial Tone roles as a transcription regulator [152], and CYBA encod- 6.1 Heritability ing p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase involved in The influence of genetics on endothelial function as meas - vascular ROS generation [134, 135], see Table  2. Yoshino ured by FMD is supported by an Italian cohort of 40 et  al. studying the genetics of endothelial dysfunction healthy young people (age 6–30, 19 male) with a family report coronary vascular responses to Acetylcholine, find - history of premature myocardial infarction, demonstrat- ing 1563 SNPs connected with cardiovascular physiology ing lower FMD (5.7 ± 5.0% vs. 10.2 ± 6.6% in control sub- and pathology [122]. Variants in adenosine A1 receptor jects; P = 0.001) [146]; and by a cohort of 50 British young (ADORA 1)  were associated with endothelial dysfunction people with a family history of coronary artery disease (31 in the entire cohort, while variants in adenosine A3 recep- male, mean age 25 years) also suggesting endothelial dys- tor (ADORA 3) and lipoprotein A (LPA) had the strongest function (FMD 4.9 ± 4.6% vs 8.3 ± 3.5% in control group, associations with increased risk of endothelial dysfunction P < 0.005) [147]. Among 883 participants of the Framing- in women, again highlighting that sex differences must be ham cohort (53% female; mean age 61), estimated herita- considered within this area of research. bility (accounting for covariates) of brachial artery baseline We did not find published heritability estimates regard - diameter was 0.33 ± 0.07, and FMD% was 0.14 ± 0.06; for ing the EndoPAT assessment tool of peripheral arterial FMD%, there was an age-gender interaction (P = 0.01), tone, though both race and sex are known to influence females showing steeper age-related FMD% decline [56]. results [54, 55]. Numerous candidate genes have been pro- Twin studies tend to be preferred above family studies for posed to influence vascular endothelial function, but only heritability estimation, as they allow a more precise sepa- six of them reported have specifically been linked to PAT, ration of environmental influences from genetic effects five of the six (83 percent) had commonality with BP traits. [148], including controlling for such age effects. Twin stud - see Fig.  2. The six linked to PAT include NOS3, already ies reporting FMD heritability estimates include a Finnish discussed in regard to FMD [117]; APO E, ACE [118], and cohort reporting FMD heritability of 24%, derived from 74 Sphk1 SNPs/alleles [120]. Siedlinski [120] elegantly com- male twin pairs (20 monozygous), aged 42–69 years, with bine Sphk1 identification through murine transcriptome monozygous twins demonstrating improved FMD after analysis with in  vivo experiments confirming a role in migrating to Sweden (7.2 ± 4.4 vs 3.7 ± 2.9%, P = 0.003), a vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction, and correla- country with lower cardiovascular risk [51]. A higher esti- tion of human sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)  serum lev- mate of 39% was reported from 94 male twin pairs from els with arterial tonometry. the USA (58 monozygous pairs), mean age 55 ± 2.8  years, 95% Caucasian [57]. 7 Heritability Study Considerations BP regulation and vascular function are complex, poly- 6.2 Genes genic traits, additionally influenced by many environ - Candidate genes linked to FMD are included in Table  2, mental factors. Molecular genetic analysis is therefore 5 of the 8 (63%) also linked to hypertension, see Fig.  2. challenging due to the sheer number of relevant genes and Examples include the Asp/Asp genotype of the endothe- their polymorphic effects, as examples in Table  2 illustrate. lial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) Glu → Asp polymor- There are also certain limitations associated with heritabil - phism, which was associated with reduced vascular nitric ity studies, as follows. oxide (NO) generation (a potent vasodilator), decreased brachial artery FMD, and increased CIMT in a group of 7.1 Family Studies young healthy individuals free of traditional cardiovascular Classical family study design can overlook non-additive risk factors [75, 149]. NOS3 regulation involves receptor- genetic effects and shared environmental factors. Addi - mediated mechanisms (e.g. acetylcholine, bradykinin, and tionally, the underlying assumption regarding the genetic substance P) and mechanical stimuli (shear stress). How- relationship is flawed; offspring tend to inherit long seg - ever, NOS3 Asp298 is not unique; more than 100 poly- ments of DNA resulting in deviations from the expected morphisms in NOS3 have been identified [150], with small 50% DNA inheritance from each parent. Furthermore, Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 74 family studies often recruit based on participant phe-8 Vascular phenotype notype, with family members then invited to partici- Various genes in Table  2 appear numerous times sug- pate. However, techniques to correct for ascertainment gesting effects on multiple vascular function assessment bias should be employed, such as Hopper and Mathews techniques. For example ACE, which cleaves angiotensin method which adjusts the heritability estimate based on I into angiotensin II with vasoconstrictive effects; ACE the mean and total variance of the genetic and environ- also stimulates the production of aldosterone, increas- mental components for each individual family grouping ing absorption of salt and water in the kidneys; ACE fur- [153]. thermore causes inactivation of the vasoactive mediator bradykinin. It is therefore not surprising that genetic poly- morphisms of ACE impact on many of the vascular assess- 7.2 Missing Heritability ment techniques described. Similarly, NOS3 (endothelial Another issue is ‘missing heritability’, i.e., the disparity nitric oxide synthase) has been identified as relevant in between heritability estimates derived from genotype data multiple assessment tools of vascular function, with local (explaining a low proportion of the variance), and from vasodilatory regulation of vascular tone and diameter (see twin studies (estimating significantly higher heritability). Table  2). Other genes or polymorphisms appear specific Missing heritability is likely a consequence of restriction to the technique or vascular trait, such as SAA1 in CIMT, of many genetic association studies to SNPs—missing COL4A in arterial stiffness (PWV), and CYBA encod- rare mutations. Gene-by-gene interactions, epigenetics, ing p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase in FMD. and gene-by-environment interactions also contribute Some furthermore show a gene by sex interaction, such to missing heritability, through assumptions that such as VCAN locus in females, encoding a chondroitin sul- interactions are minimal, identifiable, and that variance fate proteoglycan of the adventitia and intima in CIMT explained by shared environmental factors is identical in [44], and NOS3 rs1799983 relating to central pulse pres- pairs. Such assumptions risk inflating heritability estimates sure and forward wave amplitude parameters again only by attributing the contribution of environmental factors to in females [98]. Others appear to only reach significance in genetics. those with hypertension, suggesting gene by gene or gene by environment interactions e.g. CYBA T allele associated with higher FMD only in hypertensive individuals [154]. These highlight the importance of comprehensive demo - 7.3 Directionality graphic reporting and consideration of such factors when Directionality is an inherent challenge when assessing comparing data from multiple sources. Finally, fewer stud- genotypic influences effecting vascular traits: differentiat - ies were identified reporting the genetics of measures of ing if an identified gene has a direct impact on e.g., PWV, endothelial function (FMD and PAT) compared to those or alternatively elevates BP which in turn leads to arterial relating to vascular stiffness and remodeling/atherosclero - remodeling, stiffness, and results in elevated PWV. The sis; we would propose this as an area for future study. Of high proportion of identified genetic loci and candidate note, no single gene or SNP discussed here demonstrates a genes common to both vascular phenotypes and hyperten- substantial association with the vascular traits and assess- sion outlined in Table 2 and Fig. 2 highlights this. ment techniques covered. This is to be expected in poly - genic traits, but may also reflect features of study design identified above: necessity for standardised technique with 7.4 Design these tools, underpowering and lack of external validation Most data are cross-sectional in nature, from which cohorts among many studies, gene–gene or gene– envi- change over time in vascular function or BP cannot be ronment interactions. Comparisons between different inferred. One might also hypothesize that SNPs contribut- demographic groups are also complicated if age, sex, race, ing to vascular ageing for example may influence PWV at and BP are not fully adjusted for. Researchers should be 60  years of age, but not at 30. Studies that do report her- cognizant of these in future studies. itability of baseline measures and progression, have found discrepancies [40]; therefore, duration of follow up, or population age of cross-sectional data must be reported in detail. Future studies independently confirming heritabil -9 Sex‑Differences ity of vascular traits and candidate genes, as well as their Gene-by-sex interaction may not always be captured by independence from each other and from BP are required, GWAS. Efforts to elucidate sex-specific genomic deter - and will determine the utility of vascular assessment tech- minants of BP demonstrated in 120 Canadian families niques as surrogate endpoints in trials, separate from their found that one quarter of the 539 hemodynamic, anthro- use as predictive risk tools. pometric, metabolic, and humoral traits studied were C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 75 Funding both age and sex dependent, and one eighth were exclu- E. Murray received European Research Council funding to undertake an MD as sively age or sex dependent [155]. part of the Inflammatension Study (Grant number ERC-2016-COG awarded to A vascular phenotypic divide related to participant Prof T Guzik). sex may also exist, demonstrating greater discrimina- Data Availability tion between normotensive and hypertensive PWV and All data pertaining to this manuscript are already freely available and full refer- augmentation index for females than males [16] and sup- ences including DOI have been provided to facilitate access to data. ported by our own unit’s experience (unpublished). Con- versely, a collaboration establishing reference values for Declarations PWV describe apparent sex differences being almost fully Conflict of interest accounted for by age and BP differences [156]. Two points The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. therefore to consider if undertaking or analysing vascular Ethics Approval function data, is whether the groups were well matched or As a review of published literature, ethics approval was not required. adjustments for age and BP applied, and we  suggest that researchers should also report outcome data stratified by Consent for Publication Not applicable. sex to facilitate interpretation. Received: 15 August 2021 Accepted: 26 April 2022 Published online: 1 June 2022 10 Conclusion In conclusion, CIMT, PWV/PWA, FMD and PAT offer utility as surrogate markers of atherosclerosis, arterial References 1. UK, “Office of National Statistics,” www. ons. gov. uk , 2020. stiffening, endothelial and microcirculatory function i.e. 2. C Vlachopoulos et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and vascular function, and are predictive of cardiovascular secondary prevention. A position paper from the European society of risk. They may also have an increasing role as surrogate cardiology working group on peripheral circulation. Endorsed by the association for research into arterial structure and physiology (ARTERY, endpoints in genomic studies and clinical trials [157], Atherosclerosis, vol. 241, no. 2. Elsevier, pp. 507–532, 01-Aug-2015. however sex differences remain contentious, and dissect - 3. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common ing genetic associations independent from hypertension is carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarc- tion: the Rotterdam study. Circulation. 1997;96(5):1432–7. challenging. The genetics underlying these vascular assess - 4. Stein JH et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular ment techniques have been variably studied, CIMT more disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement so than PAT. The genetics of hypertension has a broad lit - from the american society of echocardiography carotid intima-media thickness task force endorsed by the society for vascular medicine, J Am erature base; the next step is to integrate characterization Soc Echocardiography, 21(2). Mosby Inc., pp. 93–111, 2008. of vascular and hypertensive phenotypes with genotypes 5. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical as a natural symbiosis in studying the pathophysiology of cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. Jan. 2007;115(4):459–67. hypertension and cardiovascular disease, and to better 6. Ferreira JP et al. (2016) Intima-media thickness is linearly and continu- personalize cardiovascular medicine. ously associated with systolic blood pressure in a population-based cohort (STANISLAS cohort study), J. Am. Heart Assoc., 5(6). 7. Hodis HN et al. (1998) The role of carotid arterial intima - Media thickness Abbreviations in predicting clinical coronary events, Ann Intern Med ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; AD: Autosomal dominant; AR: Autosomal 8. Espeland MA, O’Leary DH, Terry JG, Morgan T, Evans G, Mudra H Carotid recessive; AIx: Augmentation index; AI@75: Augmentation index adjusted to intimal-media thickness as a surrogate for cardiovascular disease events 75 bpm; AT II: Angiotensin II; BMI: Body mass index; BP: Blood pressure; CIMT: in trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, Curr Controlled Trials Cardio- Carotid intima-media thickness; cGMP: Guanosine monophosphate; CVD: Car- vasc Med 6(1). BioMed Central Ltd., 10-Mar-2005. diovascular disease; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid; 9. Laurent S, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause DZ: Dizygous; FMD: Flow-mediated dilatation; GWAS: Genome wide association and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. studies; h : Heritability; miRNA: Micro ribonucleic acid; MZ: Monozygous; N/A: 2001;37(5):1236–41. Not applicable; NO: Nitric oxide; PAT: Peripheral artery tonometry; PWA: Pulse- 10. Boutouyrie P et al. (2002) Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of wave analysis; PWV: Pulse-wave velocity; RNA: Ribonucleic acid; SBP: Systolic primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study, blood pressure; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism; SSA: Serum amyloid A. Hypertens. (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 39(1): 10–15. 11. Mitchell GF, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the framing- Acknowledgements ham heart study. Circulation. 2010;121(4):505–11. We additionally wish to acknowledge Prof T. Guzik, University of Glasgow, for a 12. Ohkuma T, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and the risk prediction supervisory role. of cardiovascular disease an individual participant data meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2017;69(6):1045–52. Author Contributions 13. Van Sloten TT, et al. Carotid stiffness is associated with incident stroke: All authors contributed to study design and manuscript writing, and approved a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. J Am the final version. ECM and AC additionally contributed to the literature search, Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(19):2116–25. data gathering and analysis. 14. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(13):1318–27. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 76 15. Kim SK, Massett MP Genetic regulation of endothelial vasomotor func- 39. Sacco RL, et al. Heritability and linkage analysis for carotid intima- tion, Front Physiol 7, no. NOV. Frontiers Media S.A., p. 571, 25-Nov-2016. media thickness: the family study of stroke risk and carotid atheroscle- 16. Nardin C, et al. Cardiovascular phenotype of elevated blood pressure rosis. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2307–12. differs markedly between young males and females the ENIGMA study. 40. Cecelja M, et al. Arterial stiffening is a heritable trait associated with Hypertension. 2018;72(6):1277–84. arterial dilation but not wall thickening: a longitudinal study in the 17. Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM. Unusual hypertensive pheno- twins UK cohort. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(24):2282–8. types: What is their significance? Hypertension. 2012;59(2):173–8. 41. Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, et al. Heritability of the function and structure of 18. Murray E, Guzik T, Delles C. Early hypertension: exploring the vascular the arterial wall: findings of the Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study. phenotype. J Hypertens. 2021;39(Supplement 1):e44–5. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2351–6. 19. Tarnoki AD, et al. Heritability of central blood pressure and arterial stiff- 42. Armstrong C, Abilleira S, Sitzer M, Markus HS, Bevan S. Polymorphisms ness: a twin study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(8):1564–71. in MMP family and TIMP genes and carotid artery intima-media thick- 20. van Rijn MJE, et al. Heritability of blood pressure traits and the genetic ness. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2895–9. contribution to blood pressure variance explained by four blood-pres- 43. Zabalza M et al. Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Genetic sure-related genes. J Hypertens. 2007;25(3):565–70. Variants and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: An Association Study and 21. Levy D, et al. Evidence for a gene influencing blood pressure on chromo - Meta-analysis, Rev. Española Cardiol. (English Ed., 68(10):869–877, Oct. some 17: Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal blood pressure 2015. phenotypes in subjects from the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 44. Strawbridge RJ et al. Carotid intima-media thickness novel loci, sex- 2000;36(4):477–83. specific effects, and genetic correlations with obesity and glucometa- 22. Alwan H, et al. Heritability of ambulatory and office blood pressure in the bolic traits in UK Biobank, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020. Swiss population. J Hypertens. 2015;33(10):2061–7. 45. Wight TN (2002) Versican: A versatile extracellular matrix proteoglycan 23. Celermajer DS, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dys- in cell biology, Curr Opin Cell Biol. function in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 46. Carty CL, et al. Association of genetic variation in serum amyloid-A 1992;340(8828):1111–5. with cardiovascular disease and interactions with IL6, IL1RN, IL1β and 24. Carvajal CA et al. (2011) Familial hyperaldosteronism a new presentation TNF genes in the cardiovascular health study. J Atheroscler Thromb. of the chimeric CYP11B1/CYP11B2 gene with low prevalence of primary 2009;16(4):419–30. aldosteronism and atypical gene segregation pattern. 47. Wang L, Colón W. The interaction between apolipoprotein serum amy- 25. Ise T, et al. A chimeric CYP11B1/CYP11B2 gene in glucocorticoid- loid A and high-density lipoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. insuppressible familial hyperaldosteronism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ). 2004;317(1):157–61. 2001;55(1):131–4. 48. Xie X, et al. Polymorphisms in the SAA1/2 gene are associated with 26. Mulatero P, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of familial hyperaldoster- carotid intima media thickness in healthy han chinese subjects: the onism: The PATOGEN study (Primary aldosteronism in TOrino-GENetic cardiovascular risk survey. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11): e13997. forms). Hypertension. 2011;58(5):797–803. 49. Johnson BD, et al. Serum amyloid a as a predictor of coronary artery 27. Jordan J, et al. Severely impaired baroreflex-buffering in patients with disease and cardiovascular outcome in women: the national heart, monogenic hypertension and neurovascular contact. Circulation. lung, and blood institute-sponsored women’s ischemia syndrome 2000;102(21):2611–8. evaluation ( WISE). Circulation. 2004;109(6):726–32. 28. Burrello J, et al. Is There a Role for Genomics in the Management of 50. Fox CS, et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to athero- Hypertension? Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1131. sclerosis phenotypes in men and women: heritability of carotid 29. Padmanabhan S, Joe B. Towards Precision Medicine for Hyperten- intima-media thickness in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. sion: A Review of Genomic, Epigenomic, and Microbiomic Eec ff ts on 2003;34(2):397–401. Blood Pressure in Experimental Rat Models and Humans. Physiol Rev. 51. Jartti L, et al. Population-based twin study of the effects of migration 2017;97(4):1469–528. from Finland to Sweden on endothelial function and intima-media 30. Friso S, et al. Epigenetic control of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydroge- thickness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(5):832–7. nase 2 gene promoter is related to human hypertension. Atherosclerosis. 52. Mitchell GF, et al. Heritability and a genome-wide linkage scan for 2008;199(2):323–7. arterial stiffness, wave reflection, and mean arterial pressure: The 31. Hu W, Wang H, Huang H. Analysis of gene expression and preliminary Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2005;112(2):194–9. study of methylation about 11β-HSD2 gene in placentas of Chinese 53. Ge D, Young TW, Wang X, Kapuku GK, Treiber FA, Snieder H (2007) pre-eclampsia patients of Han ethnicity. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. Heritability of Arterial Stiffness in Black and White American Youth and 2015;41(3):343–9. Young Adults, Am J Hypertens. 32. Lee HA, Cho HM, Lee DY, Kim KC, Han HS, Kim IK. Tissue-specific upregula- 54. Mulukutla SR, et al. Black race is associated with digital artery endothe- tion of angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 in spontaneously hypertensive lial dysfunction: results from the Heart SCORE study. Eur Heart J. rats through histone code modifications. Hypertension. 2012;59(3):621–6. 2010;31(22):2808–15. 33. Wise IA, Charchar FJ Epigenetic modifications in essential hypertension, 55. Schnabel RB, et al. Noninvasive vascular function measurement in the Int J Mol Sci 17(4). MDPI AG, p. 451, 25-Mar-2016. community cross-sectional relations and comparison of methods. Circ 34. Niiranen TJ, et al. Risk for hypertension crosses generations in Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(4):371–80. the community: a multi-generational cohort study. Eur Heart J. 56. Benjamin EJ, et al. Clinical Correlates and Heritability of Flow-Mediated 2017;38(29):2300–8. Dilation in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 35. Ramirez LA, Sullivan JC Sex differences in hypertension: Where we have 2004;109(5):613–9. been and where we are going, Am J Hypertension, 31(12). Oxford Univer- 57. Zhao J, et al. Heritability of flow-mediated dilation: a twin study. J sity Press, pp. 1247–1254, 13-Nov-2018. Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(12):2386–92. 36. Paiva AMG, et al. Impact of hypertension phenotypes on the office 58. Larsson E, et al. Hypertension and genetic variation in endothelial- and 24-h pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in individu- specific genes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):62035. als with or without antihypertensive medication use. Hypertens Res. 59. Liu T, et al. Association between daily cigarette consumption and 2019;42(12):1989–95. hypertension moderated by CYP2A6 genotypes in Chinese male cur- 37. Yan RT, Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title L, Verma S, Lonn E (2005) rent smokers. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27(1):24–30. Relationship between carotid artery intima-media thickness and brachial 60. Natarajan P, et al. Multiethnic exome-wide association study of sub- artery flow-mediated dilation in middle-aged healthy men, J Am Coll clinical atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9(6):511–20. Cardiol 61. Bis JC, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies 38. North KE, et al. Heritability of carotid artery structure and func- from the CHARGE consortium identifies common variants associ- tion: the strong heart family study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. ated with carotid intima media thickness and plaque. Nat Genet. 2002;22(10):1698–703. 2011;43(10):940–8. C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 77 62. Feitosa MF et al (2018) Novel genetic associations for blood pressure 85. Zekavat SM, et al. Genetic association of finger photoplethysmography- identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across derived arterial stiffness index with blood pressure and coronary artery multiple ancestries, PLoS One, 13(6). disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(6):1253–61. 63. López-Mejías R et al. (2014) Lack of association between ABO, PPAP2B, 86. Fung K, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci for arterial ADAMST7, PIK3CG, and EDNRA and carotid intima-media thickness, stiffness index in 127,121 UK Biobank participants OPEN. Nat Sci Rep. carotid plaques, and cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid 2019;9:9143. arthritis, Mediators Inflamm 2014. 87. Qi Y, et al. Novel mechanism of blood pressure regulation by forkhead 64. Carnevale D, Lembo G PI3Kγ in hypertension: A novel therapeutic target box class O1-mediated transcriptional control of hepatic angiotensino- controlling vascular myogenic tone and target organ damage, Cardio- gen. Hypertension. 2014;64(5):1131–40. vasc Res, vol. 95, no. 4. Oxford Academic, pp. 403–408, 01-Sep-2012. 88. Desch M et al. (2010) IRAG determines nitric oxide-and atrial natriuretic 65. Hoffmann TJ et al. (2017) Genome-wide association analyses using peptide-mediated smooth muscle relaxation, Cardiovasc Res. electronic health records identify new loci influencing blood pressure 89. Tarasov KV, et al. COL4A1 is associated with arterial stiffness by genome- variation, Nat Genet wide association scan. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2(2):151–8. 66. Warren HR, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel 90. Evangelou E, et al. Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identi- blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. fies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat Genet. Nat Genet. 2022;49(3):403–15. 2018;50(10):1412–25. 67. van SJ et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study of coronary and 91. Levy D, et al. Framingham heart study 100K project: genome-wide aortic calcification implicates risk loci for coronary artery disease and associations for blood pressure and arterial stiffness. BMC Med Genet. myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis 228(2): 400–405. 2007;8(SUPPL. 1):S3. 68. Wirtwein M, et al. Elevated ambulatory systolic-diastolic pressure 92. Mitchell GF, et al. Common genetic variation in the 3β-BCL11B gene regression index is genetically determined in hypertensive patients with desert is associated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and excess coronary heart disease. Blood Press. 2017;26(3):174–80. cardiovascular disease risk the aortagen consortium. Circ Cardiovasc 69. Jj M, et al. Large scale association analysis for identification of genes Genet. 2012;5(1):81–90. underlying premature coronary heart disease: cumulative perspective 93. Rimpelä JM, et al. Genome-wide association study of nocturnal from analysis of 111 candidate genes. J Med Genet. 2004;41(5):334–41. blood pressure dipping in hypertensive patients. BMC Med Genet. 70. Gertow K, et al. Identification of the BCAR1-CFDP1-TMEM170A locus as 2018;19(1):1–11. a determinant of carotid intima-media thickness and coronary artery 94. Gupta RM, et al. A genetic variant associated with five vascular diseases is disease risk. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012;5(6):656–65. a distal regulator of endothelin-1 gene expression. Cell. 2017;170(3):522- 71. Arya R, et al. A genetic association study of carotid intima-media thick- 533.e15. ness (CIMT ) and plaque in Mexican Americans and European Americans 95. Schutte AE, Volpe M, Tocci G, Conti E. Revisiting the relationship with rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis. 2018;271:92–101. between blood pressure and insulin-like growth factor-1. Hypertension. 72. Nandakumar P, et al. Analysis of putative cis-regulatory elements regulat- 2014;63(5):1070–7. ing blood pressure variation. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(11):1922–32. 96. Li JP, et al. The association between paired basic amino acid cleaving 73. Vojinovic D et al. (2018) Whole-genome linkage scan combined with enzyme 4 gene haplotype and diastolic blood pressure. Chin Med J exome sequencing identifies novel candidate genes for carotid intima- (Engl). 2004;117(3):382–8. media thickness, Front Genet 9, no. OCT, pp 1–10 97. Ehret GB, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pres- 74. Ali AT, Boehme L, Carbajosa G, Seitan VC, Small KS, Hodgkinson A (2019) sure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478(7367):103–9. Nuclear genetic regulation of the human mitochondrial transcriptome, 98. Mitchell GF, et al. Vascular stiffness and genetic variation at the endothe - Elife 8 lial nitric oxide synthase locus: the framingham heart study. Hyperten- 75. Paradossi U, Ciofini E, Clerico A, Botto N, Biagini A, Colombo MG. sion. 2007;49(6):1285–90. Endothelial function and carotid intima-media thickness in young 99. Alvim RO, Santos PCJL, Ferreira NE, Mill JG, Krieger JE, Pereira AC. Thiore- healthy subjects among endothelial nitric oxide synthase Glu298→Asp doxin interacting protein ( TXNIP) rs7212 polymorphism is associated and T-786→C polymorphisms. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1305–9. with arterial stiffness in the Brazilian general population. J Hum Hyper - 76. Nassereddine S, et al. The polymorphism G894T of endothelial nitric tens. 2012;26(5):340–2. oxide synthase (eNOS) gene is associated with susceptibility to essential 100. Brull DJ, et al. Eec ff t of a COL1A1 Sp1 binding site polymorphism on hypertension (EH) in Morocco. BMC Med Genet. 2018;19(1):1–8. arterial pulse wave velocity: an index of compliance. Hypertension. 77. Giri A et al. (2019) Trans-ethnic association study of blood pressure deter- 2001;38(3):444–8. minants in over 750,000 individuals, Nat Genet. 101. Lajemi M et al. (2001) Endothelin gene variants and aortic and cardiac 78. Dhingra R, et al. Relations of matrix remodeling biomarkers to blood structure in never-treated hypertensives, Am J Hypertens 14(8) I, pp. pressure progression and incidence of Hypertension in the community. 755–760. Circulation. 2009;119(8):1101–7. 102. Mattace-Raso FUS, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymor- 79. Beilby JP, Chapman CML, Palmer LJ, McQuillan BM, Thompson PL, phism and common carotid stiffness: The Rotterdam study. Atherosclero - Hung J. Stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) gene 5A/6A promoter polymorphism is sis. 2004;174(1):121–6. associated with blood pressure in a community population. J Hypertens. 103. Benetos A et al. Influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme and 2005;23(3):537–42. angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms on aortic stiffness in 80. Liu X, et al. Associations between polymorphisms of the CXCL12 normotensive and hypertensive patients, Circulation 1996. and CNNM2 gene and hypertension risk: a case-control study. Gene. 104. Dima I, et al. Association of arterial stiffness with the angiotensin-convert - 2018;675:185–90. ing enzyme gene polymorphism in healthy individuals. Am J Hypertens. 81. Lambrinoudaki I, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness 2008;21(12):1354–8. in premenopausal women: association with NOS3 and CYBA polymor- 105. Lajemi M (2001) et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-153A/G and 1166A/C phisms. Heart Vessels. 2018;33(12):1434–44. gene polymorphisms and increase in aortic stiffness with age in hyper - 82. Zhang L, et al. Lack of associations of ten candidate coronary heart tensive subjects, J Hypertens. disease risk genetic variants and subclinical atherosclerosis in four U.S. 106. Benetos A et al. (1995) Influence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor poly- populations: the population architecture using genomics and epidemiol- morphism on aortic stiffness in never-treated hypertensive patients, in ogy (PAGE) study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228(2):390–9. Hypertension. 83. Zhang X, Liu L, Gu R, Wang X (2019) Association between the ADAMT33 107. Gardier S, Vincent M, Lantelme P, Rial MO, Bricca G, Milon H (2004) variant and carotid artery intima-media thickness in the Chinese Han A1166C polymorphism of angiotensin II type 1 receptor, blood pressure population and arterial stiffness in hypertension, J Hypertens 84. Heßler N, et al. Linkage and association analysis identifies TRAF1 influenc- 108. Mayer O, Filipovský J, Pešta M, Cífková R, Dolejšová M, Šimon J (2008) Syner- ing common carotid intima-media thickness. Stroke. 2016;47:2904–9. gistic effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms on arterial stiffness, J Hum Hypertens. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 78 109. Taniwaki H, et al. Association of ACE gene polymorphism with arterial stiffness 134. Fan M, et al. CYBA C242T gene polymorphism and flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(11):1858–64. in a population of young adults: The cardiovascular risk in young finns study. 110. Sie MPS et al. (2009) Genetic variation in the renin-angiotensin system and J Hypertens. 2007;25(7):1381–7. arterial stiffness. the rotterdam study, Clin Exp Hypertens. 135. Rafiq A, Aslam K, Malik R, Afroze D. C242T polymorphism of the NADPH 111. Bozec E et al. Arterial stiffness and angiotensinogen gene in hypertensive oxidase p22PHOX gene and its association with endothelial dysfunction in patients and mutant mice, J Hypertens. asymptomatic individuals with essential systemic hypertension. Mol Med 112. Bonnardeaux A et al. (1994) Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymor- Rep. 2014;9(5):1857–62. phisms in human essential hypertension, Hypertension. 136. Guangda X, Yuhua W. Apolipoprotein e4 allele and endothelium-dependent 113. Ehret GB et al. (2016) The genetics of blood pressure regulation and its target arterial dilation in Type 2 diabetes mellitus without angiopathy. Diabetolo- organs from association studies in 342,415 individuals, Nat Genet. gia. 2003;46(4):514–9. 114. Åström Malm I, Alehagen U, Blomstrand P, Dahlström U, De Basso R (2020) 137. Traylor M, et al. Influence of genetic variation in PDE3A on endothelial function Higher blood pressure in elderly hypertensive females, with increased arte- and stroke. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):365–71. rial stiffness and blood pressure in females with the Fibrillin-1 2/3 genotype, 138. Maass PG, et al. PDE3A mutations cause autosomal dominant hypertension BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20(1). with brachydactyly. Nat Genet. 2015;47(6):647–53. 115. Medley TL, Cole TJ, Gatzka CD, Wang WYS, Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Fibrillin-1 139. Luft FC et al. (2019) Abstract 039: The PDE3A gene regulates blood pressure, genotype is associated with aortic stiffness and disease severity in patients Hypertension 74(Suppl_1). with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002;105(7):810–5. 140. Levy D, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hyperten- 116. Hong KW, et al. Genetic variations in ATP2B1, CSK, ARSG and CSMD1 loci are sion. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):677–87. related to blood pressure and/or hypertension in two Korean cohorts. J 141. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Barley J, Jeffrey S, Carter N, Deanfield J. Angio - Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(6):367–72. tensin-converting enzyme genotype is not associated with endothelial 117. Burghardt KJ, Grove TB, Ellingrod VL. Endothelial nitric oxide synthetase genetic dysfunction in subjects without other coronary risk factors. Atherosclerosis. variants, metabolic syndrome and endothelial function in schizophrenia. J 1994;111(1):121–6. Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(4):349–56. 142. Logan JG, Engler MB, Kim H. Genetic Determinants of Arterial Stiffness. Adv 118. Korsakova N et al. Genetic polymorphisms as risk factors of endothelial dys- Data Anal Classif. Feb. 2015;9(1):23–43. function in pregnant women, in European Hematology Association, 2018, 143. Lacolley P, Challande P, Osborne-Pellegrin M, Regnault V. Genetics and patho- PB2508. physiology of arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;81(4):637–48. 119. Montrezol FT, et al. ACE gene plays a key role in reducing blood pressure in 144. Salvi P et al. (2008) Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave veloc- the hyperintensive elderly after resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. ity estimation, J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33(4):1119–29. 145. Van Bortel LM, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of 120. Siedlinski M, et al. Vascular transcriptome profiling identifies Sphingosine aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J kinase 1 as a modulator of angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction. Sci Hypertens. 2012;30(3):445–8. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13. 146. Gaeta G, et al. Arterial abnormalities in the offspring of patients with premature 121. Di Pietro D, Oliveti M, Sommella E, Al E Sortilin evokes endothelial dysfunc- myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(12):840–6. tion and arterial hypertension through the dysregulation of sphingolipid 147. Clarkson P, Celermajer DS, Powe AJ, Donald AE, Henry RMA, Deanfield metabolism and oxidative stress, in ESC Congress 2020—The Digital Experi- JE. Endothelium-dependent dilatation is impaired in young healthy ence—Programme, 2020. subjects with a family history of premature coronary disease. Circulation. 122. Yoshino S et al (2016) Sex-specific genetic variants are associated with coro - 1997;96(10):3378–83. nary endothelial dysfunction, J Am Heart Assoc 5(4). 148. MacGregor AJ, Snieder H, Schork NJ, Spector TD Twins—novel uses to study 123. Newton-Cheh C, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci complex traits and genetic diseases, Trends in Genetics 16(3). Trends Genet, associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):666–76. pp. 131–134, 01-Mar-2000. 124. McMaster W, Saleh M, Kirabo M, Itani H, Harrison D, Madhur M (2022) Defi- 149. Persu A, et al. Modifier effect of ENOS in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney ciency of LNK/SH2B3 promotes hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(3):229–41. aortic dissection, Angiogenesis, vol. 17, no. Developmental Vascular Biology 150. Jones LC, Hingorani AD. Genetic regulation of endothelial function. Heart. and Genetics Workshop VI and Vascular Inflammation Workshop organized 2005;91(10):1275–7. by NAVBO: ABSTRACTS, pp. 935–984, 2014. 151. Casas JP, Bautista LE, Humphries SE, Hingorani AD. Endothelial nitric oxide 125. Dale BL, Madhur MS Linking Inflammation and Hypertension via LNK/SH2B3. synthase genotype and ischemic heart disease: meta-analysis of 26 studies 126. Ference BA, Julius S, Mahajan N, Levy PD, Williams KA, Flack JM. Clinical effect involving 23 028 subjects. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1359–65. of naturally random allocation to lower systolic blood pressure beginning 152. Park JY, et al. NFKB1 promoter variation implicates shear-induced NOS3 gene before the development of hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;63(6):1182–8. expression and endothelial function in prehypertensives and stage I hyper- 127. Smyth SS, Cheng HY, Miriyala S, Panchatcharam M, Morris AJ Roles of lysophos- tensives. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol. 2007;293(4):H2320. phatidic acid in cardiovascular physiology and disease, Biochimica et 153. Hopper JL, Mathews JD. A multivariate normal model for pedigree and longi- Biophysica Acta—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1781(9). NIH Public tudinal data and the software ‘fisher.’ Aust J Stat. 1994;36(2):153–76. Access, pp. 563–570, Sep-2008. 154. Rafiq K, Nishiyama A (2014) Is antioxidant therapy effective for advanced 128. Gu K, Zhang Y, Sun K, Jiang X (2020) Associations between PHACTR1 gene hypertension and renal injury?, J Hypertens. polymorphisms and pulse pressure in Chinese Han population, Biosci Rep. 155. S. ˇ eda O et al. Systematic, genome-wide, sex-specific linkage of cardiovascular 40(6). traits in french canadians,” 2008. 129. Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide linkage and association scans for pulse pressure 156. Mattace-Raso FUS, et al. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people in Chinese twins. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(11):1051–7. and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and 130. Ingelsson E, Syvänen AC, Lind L. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in reference values.’ Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2338–50. conduit and resistance vessels in relation to the endothelial nitric oxide 157. Alexander Y et al. (2021) Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a synthase gene. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(8):569–78. consensus paper of the European society of cardiology working groups on 131. Shibao CA, et al. A Common CD36 Variant Influences Endothelial Function atherosclerosis and vascular biology, aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, and Response to Treatment with Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibition. J Clin coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation, and Thr, Cardiovasc. Res.. Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(7):2751–8. 132. Liu X, Meng F, Yang P. Association study of CD36 single nucleotide polymor- phisms with essential hypertension in the Northeastern Han Chinese. Gene. 2013;527(1):410–5. 133. Akpinar TS, et al. Endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase, angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms and endothelial functions in healthy individuals. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(1):39–45. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Artery Research Springer Journals

A Review of Vascular Traits and Assessment Techniques, and Their Heritability

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-review-of-vascular-traits-and-assessment-techniques-and-their-HwSHQdA8Np

References (167)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022
eISSN
1876-4401
DOI
10.1007/s44200-022-00016-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Various tools are available to assess atherosclerosis, arterial stiffening, and endothelial function. They offer utility in the assessment of hypertensive phenotypes, in cardiovascular risk prediction, and as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. We explore the relative influence of participant genetics, with reference to large-scale genomic studies, population-based cohorts, and candidate gene studies. We find heritability estimates highest for carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT 35–65%), followed by pulse wave velocity as a measure of arterial stiffness (26–43%), and flow mediated dilatation as a surrogate for endothelial function (14–39%); data were lacking for peripheral artery tonometry. We furthermore examine genes and polymorphisms relevant to each technique. We conclude that CIMT and pulse wave velocity dominate the existing evidence base, with fewer published genomic linkages for measures of endothelial function. We finally make recommendations regarding planning and reporting of data relating to vascular assessment techniques, particularly when genomic data are also available, to facilitate integration of these tools into cardiovascular disease research. Keywords: Heritability, Genetic, Vascular, Arterial stiffening, Endothelial, CIMT techniques and hypertensive phenotypes, including the 1 Introduction relative influence of participant sex and genetics. We Hypertension is a major risk factor for Cardiovascular Dis- explore this topic with reference to large scale genomic ease (CVD); in turn CVD is the underlying cause of more studies, population-based cohorts, and candidate gene than a quarter of deaths in the UK [1]. There are no vali - studies. dated tests that can identify early in the disease process which individuals will develop hypertension-mediated 1.1 Definitions for the Non‑expert organ damage. Dysfunctional vascular traits represent key Genome: complete set of genes in an organism includ- pathophysiological processes in the development of hyper- ing introns (non-coding sequences) and exons (coding tension and cardiovascular disease, with both inherited sequences). and reversible elements. These traits include stiffness of Genome-wide association study: entire genome surveyed the large arteries, microvascular abnormalities, endothelial for genetic variants occurring more frequently in cases dysfunction, and atherosclerosis, phenotypes often appar- than in controls. ent prior to established hypertension or organ damage. Candidate gene study: specify fewer variants of interest Hence the interest in measuring vascular function, and a priori, and aim to establish if a disease association can be in understanding the relationship between measurement confirmed. *Correspondence: Eleanor.Murray@ggc.nhs.scot.uk Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 62 Epigenetics: genetic modification without mutations regulated by many systems (sympathetic nervous system, of the DNA sequence; occur in normal development or endocrine, and local autoregulation), each with polygenic induced by environmental factors. influences [15]. Endothelial function can be assessed using Exome: complete set of exons present in an organism ultrasound of the brachial artery with ‘flow-mediated dila - which accounts for all the coding regions of genes present. tion’ (FMD), dilation predominantly mediated by nitric SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism—DNA sequence oxide release from endothelial cells. Alternatively, periph- variations with a single nucleotide (adenine, thymine, eral arterial tonometry (PAT), commonly quantified by cytosine, or guanine) in the genome sequence altered. the Endo-PAT2000 device (Itamar Medical) also assesses Common variants: SNPs with minor allele frequency microcirculatory and endothelial function by measuring (MAF) of greater than 1%, accounting for over 90% of arterial tone or ‘hyperaemic response’ in the fingertips in genetic variation between individuals. response to proximal occlusion. EndoPAT-2000 device Mendelian Randomization: method of using measured also generates an augmentation index adjusted to a heart variation in genes of known function to examine the causal rate of 75  bpm (AI@75), similar to PWA but derived effect of a modifiable exposure on disease. from peripheral vessels. Hence, these techniques not only reflect different aspects of the pathophysiology of hyper - 2 Assessment of Vascular Function and Disease tension and cardiovascular disease but may aid identifica - Cardiovascular outcome measures in clinical trials gener- tion of different hypertensive phenotypes [16]–[18]. They ally relate to coded events such as myocardial infarction or are also well accepted as being influenced by age, BP, and death; alternatively, research trials may employ surrogate sex; factors that should be accounted for when comparing markers such as vascular stiffness and endothelial dys - techniques. Less well defined are the effects of underlying function—early functional traits known to be predictors genetic differences, i.e. the inherited component, or ‘herit - of more advanced structural changes and development of ability’ of data pertaining to techniques measuring vascu- cardiovascular disease. Assessment techniques quantify- lar health. Genotypic effects on these vascular assessment ing such traits reflect different aspects of vascular health, tools are myriad, but key checkpoints where influence may assessed in the European Society of Cardiology Working be hypothesised include vascular endothelial cell sensitiv- group position paper [2]. First, carotid ultrasound to meas- ity to extracellular stimuli, intra-cellular signalling cas- ure intima-media thickness (CIMT) has clinical utility in cades, and effects on transcription, ultimately influencing diagnosing carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease [3]–[5], production of vasoactive substances, vascular tone, and but is also linearly associated with blood pressure (BP) [6] remodelling. and adds prognostic value in the prediction of cardiovascu- lar events and mortality, see Sect. 3.1 [7, 8]. Second, pulse 3 Genetics of Hypertension wave analysis (PWA), PWA-derived augmentation index Familial and twin studies estimate that the heritable com- (AIx), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) ponent of BP lies between 22 and 65% [19]–[22]. BP is a assess for arterial stiffness, a process characterised by func - complex trait with no single gene playing a dominant role; tional changes and structural remodelling within the arte- instead multiple genes demonstrate minor additive effects. rial wall, with associated fibrosis and calcification. These These genes encode for a variety of proteins, ion channels, measures of arterial stiffening are independent and reli - receptors, and enzymes involved in endocrine, cardiac, able predictors of hypertension, myocardial infarction and renal, vascular and neural systems that influence BP regu - stroke [9]–[11], with meta-analyses of individual patient lation. This complexity is illustrated by the heterogeneity data showing the alternative brachial-ankle PWV method of underlying pathology in the (rare) monogenic cases of also associated with cardiovascular complications [12], secondary hypertension, examples of which are discussed and stiffening of the carotid artery with incident stroke in Sect.  2.1.1. Other genes are identified only by genome [13]. The predictive strength of arterial stiffness is, how - wide association studies (GWAS); an illustrative example ever, greater in subjects with an established cardiovascular follows in Sect. 2.1.2. risk [14]. Finally, endothelial function refers to its’ ability to detect physical (shear stress) and biochemical signals, 3.1 Single Gene Disorders and respond through expression of surface molecules and Monogenic causes of hypertension are rare and mecha- production of vasoactive and inflammatory mediators. nisms varied. For example, children with homocystinuria Endothelial dysfunction precedes structural micro-circu- and familial hypercholesterolaemia develop premature latory changes. Hypertension can be both cause and con- atherosclerosis and early endothelial dysfunction [23]; in sequence of microcirculatory dysfunction, closely tied to AD glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism, chimeric peripheral vascular resistance, with vascular tone in turn genes encoding steroid 11ß-hydroxylase (CYP11B1) and C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 63 aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) lead to aldosterone reg- vascular techniques used to measure these hypertensive ulation by ACTH rather than angiotensin II [24, 25], salt phenotypes. and water retention, and elevation in BP [26]. Finally, AD hypertension with brachydactyly syndrome results from a 4 Carotid Intima‑Media Thickness gain of function mutation in PDE3A, encoding phospho-4.1 Heritability diesterase 3A and resulting in cerebral vascular anomalies A number of studies have reported heritability estimates and baroreceptors hypersensitivity [27]. For an in-depth for CIMT, though with disparate estimates (21 to 65%) review of monogenic hypertensive syndromes, we would despite similar adjustment for covariates, see Fig.  1 and highlight Burrello et al. [28]. Table  1 [38, 39]. Sacco et  al. for example report 65% her- itability in 100 Dominican families (1390 individuals, 61% 3.2 GWAS female, mean age 46  years) after adjustment for age, sex, GWAS have identified multitudes of genetic loci associ - smoking, and BMI [39]; Cecelja et al. estimate age-adjusted ated with BP, covered in-depth elsewhere [29]. For exam- heritability at 49% (95% CI 17–63%) in 762 females of the ple ATP2B1 encoding PMCA1, a plasma membrane Twins UK cohort with mean age 58 ± 9  years [40]; whilst ATPase expressed in vascular endothelium and involved only 35% heritability is reported by Sayed-Tabatabaei et al. in calcium pumping from the cytosol to the extracellu- [41] in their assessment of 930 individuals connected in a lar compartment. GWAS can, however, be susceptible to single pedigree from an isolated population (participants false positive associations if statistical analysis lacks rigour, of the Erasmus Rucphen Family study). if the panel fails to reflect genomic variation, or the study lacks statistical power; points to remain cognizant of.4.2 Genes GWAS identifies numerous genetic loci as having possible 3.3 Epigenetics significance, and studies of candidate genes approximat - Processes of epigenetic modification include methylation, ing to these loci have also been widely reported (Table 2); post-translational histone modification, and small non- 16 of the 32 identified (50%) also have evidence of asso - coding RNAs. HSD11B2 gene promoter methylation for ciation with BP traits. Figure  2 demonstrates that many example has been associated with hypertension onset [30, genes have a role vascular remodelling, such as MMP9 31]; acetylation meanwhile promotes gene transcription of [42] encoding a gelatinase targeting type IV collagen and NOS3 (eNOS) and other genes affecting vascular tone and gelatin; CXCL12 involved in endothelial and epithelial cell salt and water homeostasis [32, 33]. Finally, small non-cod- proliferation and migration [43]; and VCAN [44] which ing RNAs (miRNA) may conversely downregulate genes encodes chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (extracellular by binding the corresponding mRNA resulting in repres- matrix components), thus regulates cell proliferation, dif- sion of translation [33]. Population-based studies further ferentiation, and survival [45]. support the role of epigenetics in hypertension [34]. 4.3 Interactions 3.4 S ex and BP Genetics Other genes demonstrate the importance of gene-by-envi- The male–female difference in BP, vascular traits, and ronment interactions in determining CIMT, for example CVD is complex. Mediating factors include X and Y chro- MCPH1 encodes a damage response protein regulating mosome differences, sex-hormone influences, renin– cell cycle [44]. Similarly, gene–gene interactions are appar- angiotensin–aldosterone system divergence [35], societal ent, for example genes involved in cholesterol biology and and behavioral impacts, and even epigenetic differences, inflammation where high-density lipoprotein composition with females receiving genetic imprints from each parent’s is altered in an inflammatory state, with apolipoprotein- X chromosome, random X inactivation leading to fur- A-I and –A-II displaced by Serum amyloid A (SAA). SAA ther genetic heterogeneity. Gene-by-sex interactions, and SNPs rs2468844 and rs12218 alter binding affinity of SAA age (menopause)-dependent effects further complicate proteins [46, 47], with implications for reverse cholesterol interpretation. transport, CIMT, plaque formation [48], and plaque stabil- ity [49]. 3.5 Summary Bringing together the evidence of different phenotypes of 5 Vascular Stiffness: Pulse Wave Analysis and Pulse hypertension [16–18, 36, 37], determined by pathophysi- Wave Velocity ology but characterised by the aforementioned vascular 5.1 Heritability traits; and considering the exponentially increasing data Genes are estimated to account from 26 to 43% of the regarding hypertension risk alleles; it becomes impor- variability in vascular stiffness as measured by PWV (see tant to explore the genotypic and sex associations with Table  1, Fig.  1), with data derived from both population Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 64 Sacco Cecelja Ge 40 Mitchell Zhao Fox Cecelja Jarr Sayed-Tabatabaei Sayed-Tabatabaei Jarr North Benjamin 0246 81012141618 CIMT es mates in orange, PWV/PWA blue, PAT no data, FMD green Fig. 1 Evidence regarding heritability of techniques assessing vascular function and twin studies [40, 41, 52, 53]. For example, the Georgia randomization data supporting causality, with genetic Cardiovascular Twin Study of 388 twins (41% black; 49% predisposition of arterial stiffness preceding hypertension male) aged 12–30  years; report 53% (42–62%) heritabil- [85]. ity for dorsalis pedis (foot) PWV [53], with no sex or race differences; additionally, the aforementioned Twins UK 5.3 Interactions cohort of 762 females, mean age 58 ± 9 report heritability Fifteen of the 24 genes (62.5%) implicated in arterial stiff - estimate of 38% (95% CI 16–63%) after adjustment, with ness have evidence of BP associations, see Table  2. Many annual progression interestingly demonstrating higher candidate gene polymorphisms studied in greater detail adjusted heritability estimates of 55% (31–64%) over relate to the renin angiotensin aldosterone system; in par- 5 years follow-up [40]. ticular angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene poly- morphisms are known to influence vascular tone, fibrosis, 5.2 Genes and ultimately arterial stiffness, though with discordant Many studies of the genetics of arterial stiffness focus on results between healthy, diabetic, and hypertensive popu- parameters other than PWV, such as pulse pressure and lations, despite adjustments for demographic and lifestyle forward and reflected wave amplitude, covered in detail factors [104, 106, 142], suggesting either an additional elsewhere [142, 143]. Looking specifically at PWV as the interaction or confounding factor is involved. Similarly, most commonly used technique, GWAS of 644 individu- the A1166C polymorphism of angiotensin II type 1 recep- als involved in the Framingham Heart Study did not find tor gene (AGTR1) was associated with arterial stiffness any variants achieving genome wide significance in the in hypertensive participants [103, 108], but not among primary analysis [91], despite the Mitchell et  al.study of normotensive participants of the same study, nor the Rot- 2127 participants (mean age of 60 years, 57% female) also terdam Study population [103, 110]. Study participant derived from the Framingham cohort reporting moderate age needs to be considered in such publications as com- heritability for PWV (h = 0.40), with suggestive linkage bined effects may be apparent, e.g. C allele carriers show - regions in chromosomes 2, 7, 13, and 15 [52]. Informed by ing increased PWV, but only beyond 55 years of age [103], GWAS, and based on UK Biobank data, Zekavat et al. [85] though the Rotterdam study population was over 55 years generated a six variant polygenic arterial stiffness score, of age but still did not support the association. Addition- showing a relationship with SBP and DBP, and Mendelian ally, heterogeneous methods of estimating arterial stiffness Percent heritability C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 65 Table 1 Evidence regarding heritability of techniques assessing vascular function CIMT Heritability: 35–65% BP considerations of study 65% (95% CI 60–70%): 100 Dominican families after adjustment for age, 40% had hypertension, which met inclusion criteria as a covariate for CIMT. sex, smoking, and BMI. Sacco 2009 [39] A chromosome 14q-hypertension interaction suggested for CIMT. Sacco 2009 [39] 49% (95% CI 17–63%) adjusted for age: 762 females ( Twins UK cohort), Progression of CIMT was negatively associated with treatment for hyperten- mean age 58 ± 9 years; average follow up 4.9 years; heritability of annual sion. Cecelja 2018 [40] progression of CIMT only 8% (95% CI 0–36%). Cecelja 2018 [40] 35% ± 8 (after adjustment; P < 0.001): 930 individuals connected in a Heritability 41% unadjusted, 35% adjusted for BP (and other factors), sug- single pedigree from an isolated population (Erasmus Rucphen Family gesting pleiotropic genes. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] cohort); mean age females 51, males 54 yrs. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] 38% ± 6 heritability, adjusted for multiple covariates; n = 906 men, 980 40% of males and 36% of females had hypertension. Estimated age- and women (mean age 57 years) from 586 extended families of the Framing- sex-adjusted heritability (c.f. the multivariable-adjusted) was 44% Fox 2003 ham Ospr ff ing cohort. Fox 2003 [50] [50] 21% ± 6 after adjustment for multiple covariates; n = 950 American Indi- Hypertension did not reach significance as a covariate for CIMT. Proportion ans of the Strong Heart Study (SHS); ≈30% with diabetes and hyperten- of variance due to covariates: 46%. North 2002 [38] sion; mean ages of different communities 41 to 44 years. North 2002 [38] 36%: 74 male twin pairs, 20 MZ, aged 42 to 69, one twin migrating to IMT correlated with S (r = 0.24, P = 0.004). Jartti 2002 [51] Sweden; IMT values also correlated between twin pairs (rMZ = 0.64, P = 0.002; rDZ = 0.46, P = 0.0006). Jartti 2002 [51] PWV and PWA Heritability: 26–43% BP considerations of study 26% ± 8 (after adjustment, P < 0.001) for PWV: n = 930; from an isolated Heritability 36% unadjusted, 26% adjusted for BP (and other factors), sug- population (Erasmus Rucphen Family); mean age females 51, males 54 yrs. gesting pleiotropic genes. Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] Sayed-Tabatabaei 2005 [41] 40% ± 9 among 1480 participants representing 817 pedigrees in the Analysed PWV separately from BP, and used additional linkage sample: the Framingham Study offspring cohort. Mean age 60 ± 10 years. Variance results mapped to separate genomic locations with credible candidate components linkage analysis identified chromosomes 2, 7, 13, and 15 for genes, suggesting distinct genetic determinants. Mitchell 2005 [52] PWV. Mitchell 2005 [52] 38% (95% CI 16–63%) adjusted: 762 females ( Twins UK cohort), mean age Demonstrate association between progression in PWV and longitudinal BP, 58 ± 9 years; average follow up 4.9 years; heritability of annual progression though not directionality. Cecelja 2018 [40] of PWV 55% (31–64%). Cecelja 2018 [40] 43% (95% CI 30–54%) / 53% (95% CI 42–62%) for radial / foot PWV respec- Overlap with genes influencing DBP. Ge 2007 [53] tively. No ethnicity or gender differences in estimates. 41% black; 49% male; aged 12–30 (mean 17.7 ± 3.3) years; n = 388, twins: 89 pairs MZ, 105 pairs DZ. Ge 2007 Georgia Cardiovascular Twin Study [53] PAT heritability: unknown BP considerations of study No published heritability estimates identified; though race, sex, and age influ- N/A ence EndoPAT results. Mulukutla 2010; Schnabel, 2011 [54, 55] FMD heritability: 14–39% BP considerations of study 14%: n = 883, 53% women; mean age 61; adjusting for stepwise model Concluded SBP is an important correlate of FMD; but not directionality or covariates, estimated heritability of brachial artery baseline diameter was whether associated through a third factor. Benjamin 2004 [56] 33 ± 7%, and FMD% was 14 ± 6%, with age-gender interaction (P = 0.01). Benjamin 2004 [56] 24%: 74 male twin pairs, 20 MZ, aged 42–69, one twin migrat- FMD correlated with SBP: r = − 0.21 (P = 0.01), and DBP: r = − 0.17 ing to Sweden; FMD did not correlate between twins, (rMZ = 0.23, (P = 0.04). Jartti 2002 [51] P = 0.34; rDZ = 0.11, P = 0.43), suggesting modest genetic component; h2 = 2 × (0.23 − 0.11) = 0.24. Jartti 2002 [51] 39% (95% CI 18–56%): 94 male twin pairs, mean age 55 ± 2.8 years; adjusted Unadjusted correlation of FMD and SBP: r = − 0.05 (P = 0.15) and DBP: for age, cholesterol, DBP, and body mass index. Zhao 2007 [57] r = − 0.08 (P = 0.08), P values corrected using generalized estimating equation. Zhao 2007 [57] CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, FMD flow-mediated dilatation, PWA pulse-wave analysis, PWV pulse-wave velocity, PAT peripheral arterial tone, BP blood pressure, MZ monozygous, DZ dizygous, N/A not applicable (no evidence of BP association) limit comparisons of studies. Mayer et al. for example find than for carotid-brachial PWV, consistent with Salvi et al. AGTR1 polymorphism significant in femoral-popliteal reporting carotid-femoral techniques are more reliable PWV but not carotid-femoral [108]; Levy et al. conversely [91, 144]. This emphasises the need for standardized tech - report greater heritability estimates for carotid-femoral nique, with the consensus now favouring carotid-femoral Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 66 Table 2 Gene polymorphisms relating to techniques measuring vascular health, with consideration of sex differences and heritability estimates CIMT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association ATG10—E2-like enzyme involved in 2 ubiquitin-like modifications essen- GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A tial for autophagosome formation Strawbridge 2020 [44] RPS23—encodes a ribosomal protein Strawbridge 2020[44] GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A ATP6AP1L—ATPase H + Transporting Accessory Protein 1 Like, a protein GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A coding gene; Strawbridge 2020[44] MIR8055 and MIR4693—RNA Genes affiliated with the miRNA class; GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A Strawbridge 2020 [44] CBFA2T3—encodes a myeloid translocation gene family member which GWAS (UK Biobank) Larsson 2013 [58] interact to repress transcription; Strawbridge 2020 [44] CYP2A6 and CYP2A7- encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 GWAS (UK Biobank) Liu 2013 [59] superfamily of enzymes; Strawbridge 2020 [44] APOE E2 allele encodes a major apoprotein of the chylomicron. Natara- Meta-analysis of exome-WAS & GWAS (CHARGE) N/A jan 2016; Bis 2011; Strawbridge 2020. [44, 60, 61] BCAM—basal cell adhesion molecule; encodes Lutheran blood group Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A glycoprotein, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and a receptor for laminin Starwbridge 2020, Bis 2011 [44, 61] ZHX2—acts as a transcriptional repressor, rs11781551 associated with Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A lower CIMT; Bis 2011 [61] APOC1—expressed primarily in the liver, activated when monocytes Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) N/A differentiate into macrophages Bis 2011 [61] PINX1—Microtubule-binding protein essential for chromosome segrega- Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Feitosa 2018 [62] tion, 1rs6601530 copy number associated with higher CIMT; Bis 2011 [61] PIK3CG—phosphorylate inositol lipids involved in immune response, Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Carnevale 2012 [64] rs17398575 associated with 18% increased odds of plaque Bis 2011 [61], not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] EDNRA—encodes the receptor for endothelin-1; role in vasoconstriction; Meta-analysis of GWAS (CHARGE) Hoffman 2017 [65] rs1878406 associated with 22% increased odds of plaque; Bis 2011[61]; not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] ADAMTS7—a member of the ADAMTS family, a disintegrin and metal- GWAS (Dutch and Belgian Lung Cancer Screen- Warren 2017 [66], Wirtwein 2017 [68] loproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; van Setten et al., 2013 [67], ing population) not supported by López-Mejías 2014 [63] THBS2—thrombospondin 2, a disulfide-linked homotrimeric glycopro - GWAS (GeneQuest, USA) Oguri 2009 [66] tein that mediates cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions; McCarthy 2004 [69] CFDP1—protein coding gene, may play a role during embryogenesis; GWAS (IMPROVE population, European) The UK Biobank Cardio-metabolic Traits Consortium Blood Pressure Work- Gertow, 2012 [70] ing Group [66] SLC17A2—involved in phosphate transport into cells; rs17526722 associ- GWAS (RA patients) N/A ated with lower CIMT in Mexican-Americans. Arya 2018 [71] PPCDC—necessary for biosynthesis of coenzyme A; rs1867148 associ- GWAS (RA patients) Nandakumar 2019 [72] ated with lower CIMT in European-Americans; Arya 2018 [71] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 67 Table 2 (continued) CIMT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association PNPT1—RNA-binding protein involved in multiple processes e.g. import- GWAS (Erasmus Rucphen Family) Ali 2019 [74] ing RNA into mitochondria. Vojinovic 2018 [73] NOS3—nitric oxide has a role in vascular tone; Asp/Asp genotype dem- Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri [77], and others onstrated greater CIMT (P = 0.0002) Paradossi 2004 [75] SAA1 (rs12218) and SSA2 (rs2468844)—acute phase protein, associated Candidate gene study N/A with CIMT in healthy Chinese population Xie 2010[48] MMP9—involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix; associated Candidate gene study Dhingra 2016 [78] with internal carotid but not common carotid artery IMT Armstrong 2007[42], MMP3—involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix; relationship Candidate gene study Armstrong 2007 [42] Beilby 2005 [79] between increasing copy number and CIMT Armstrong 2007[42] TIMP3—inactivates metalloproteinases; shows relationship between Candidate gene study Armstrong 2007 [42] increasing copy number and CIMT. Armstrong 2007[42] CXCL12—arterial remodeling and thickening, rs1746048 associated with Candidate gene study Liu 2018 [80] IMT. Zabalza 2015[43] WDR12—involved in cell cycle/proliferation, signal transduction and Candidate gene study Wirtwein 2017 [68] gene regulation; inverse association with CIMT; Zabalza 2015 [43] CYBA encodes p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase. C242T Candidate gene study N/A polymorphism was a predictor of internal CIMT following multivariable adjustment (b-coefficient − 0.119, p = 0.011). Lambrinoudaki 2018[81] GCKR—product is a regulatory protein that inhibits glucokinase in liver Candidate gene study N/A and pancreatic islet cells; rs780094 associated with carotid plaque in the American Indian but not European-, African-, or Mexican–American populations Zhang 2013[82] ADAM33—transmembrane protein, role in inflammation and regenera- Candidate gene study N/A tion; rs514174 associated with CIMT; Zhang 2019[83] TRAF1—adapter molecule that regulates the activation of NF-kappa-B Linkage analysis N/A and JNK, Heßler 2016[84] SMOC-1—glycoprotein mediating cell–matrix interactions Sacco 2009 Linkage analysis N/A [39] FBLN5—secreted protein involved in cell adhesion Sacco 2009 [39] Linkage analysis N/A CIMT Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association VCAN—female-specific locus; encodes a chondroitin sulfate proteogly- GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A can of the adventitia and intima. Strawbridge 2020 [44] MCPH1—DNA damage response protein Starwbridge 2020 [44] GWAS (UK Biobank) N/A PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association TEX41 (rs1006923), testis expressed 41 RNA gene. Zekavat 2019; Fung GWAS (UK BioBank) Zekavat 2019 included causal inference analyses with BP [85]. Also Warren 2019[85, 86] 2017 [66] Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 68 Table 2 (continued) PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association FOXO1 (rs7331212)—role in T lymphocyte function and cell cycle regula- GWAS (UK BioBank) Animal model Qi 2014 [87] tion including osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Zekavat 2019, Fung 2019 [85, 86] MRVI1 (rs10840457), synonym: IRAG. Role as regulator of IP3-induced GWAS (UK BioBank) Animal model association with BP: Desch 2010 [88]; association not calcium release in platelet activation and NO-dependent smooth muscle evidenced in human studies relaxation. Fung 2019[86] COL4A1 and COL4A2 (rs3742207, rs9521719, rs872588)—type 4 collagen GWAS (UK BioBank and SardiNIA) N/A and associated with arterial stiffness (by PulseTrace PCA2); Zekavat 2019 and Fung 2019 [85, 86]; Tarasov 2009 [89] TCF20 (rs55906806): transcription factor recognises platelet-derived GWAS (UK BioBank) N/A growth factor-responsive element in MMP3 promoter. Zekavat 2019 and Fung 2019[85, 86] C1orf21 (rs1930290): chromosome 1 open reading frame. Fung 2019 [86] GWAS (UK BioBank) Evangelou 2018 [90]; Giri 2018 [77] MAGI1 (rs1495448): membrane associated guanylate kinase i.e. scaffold- GWAS (SardiNIA) Levy 2007 [91] ing protein; associated with PWV. Tarasov 2009 [89] BCL11B (rs7152623) role in immune regulation; linked to carotid-femoral Meta-analysis of 9 European ancestry GWAS Association with nocturnal dipping (GENRES (n = 204), DYNAMIC (n = 183) PWV and CVD. Mitchell 2012[92] and DILGOM cohorts (n = 180) Rimpelä 2018 [93] IL6 (pro-inflammatory cytokine). Mitchell 2005 [52](Framingham Study GWAS (Framingham) N/A offspring cohort, n = 1480) PHACTR1 (rs9349379) regulates cytoskeleton; G allele linked to decreased GWAS (UK BioBank) Gupta 2017,n = 38,817 (UK BioBank) [94] arterial stiffness (PulseTrace PCA2) Zekavat 2019[85] IGF1R (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) complex effects on vas- GWAS (Framingham) Schutte 2014 [95] culature including cellular proliferation, vasodilation via NO, and other endothelial functions. Mitchell 2005 [52] MEF2A (myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2A), DNA-binding transcrip - GWAS (Framingham) Evangelou 2018 [90]; Giri 2018 [77] tion factor, activates growth factor and stress-induced genes. Mitchell 2005[52] CHSY1 (chondroitin synthase 1), role in biosynthesis of chondroitin GWAS (Framingham) N/A sulfate, a glycosaminoglycan required for cell proliferation and morpho- genesis. Mitchell 2005[52] PACE4 (PCSK6) and FURIN, encodes a protease with multiple substrates GWAS (Framingham) Li 2004 [96]; Ehret 2011 [97] including pro-hormones, growth factors and von Willebrand factor; Mitchell 2005 [52] ADD2 (β-adducin), encode subunits of membrane skeletal proteins. GWAS (Framingham) N/A Mitchell 2005[52] TACR1 (tachykinin/neurokinin-1 receptor) encodes receptor for and GWAS (Framingham) N/A mediates metabolism of tachykinin substance P. Mitchell 2005[52] ADRA2B (beta adrenergic receptor) mediate catecholamine-induced inhi- GWAS (Framingham) N/A bition of adenylate cyclase through G proteins; Mitchell 2005[52] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 69 Table 2 (continued) PWV and PWA Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association NOS3 rs1799983 related to central pulse pressure and forward wave Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri 2018 [77] and others amplitude parameters of PWA) in females only. Mitchell 2007[98]) TXNIP (rs7212) G allele associated with higher PWV values; functions as Candidate gene study (Brazilian cohort) N/A sensor for biomechanical and oxidative stress. Alvim 2011[99] (Brazilian cohort, n = 1518) COL1A1 polymorphisms—collagen type 1A deposition in arterial compli- Candidate gene study N/A ance. Brull 2001[100] (Young Hearts Project, UK, N = 489) ETAR (Endothelin-A and -B receptor, synonym EDNRA); endothelin being Candidate gene study Hoffman et l 2016 [65] a vasoconstrictor; gene variants influenced PWV. Lajemi 2001[101] (n = 528, untreated hypertensive Europeans) ACE I/D (rs4340)—role in BP regulation and electrolyte balance through Candidate gene studies Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others hydrolyzing angiotensin I, influence on arterial stiffness. Heterogeneous findings regarding implications of D allele. Mattace- Raso 2004; Benetos 1996; Dima 2008; Taniwaki 1999; Lajemi 2001; Benetos 1995; Gardier 2004; Mayer 2008[102]–[109] AGTR1 (AT II type 1 receptor)—AT II acts as a vasoconstrictor and regu- Candidate gene studies Numerous, see www. ensem bl. org; e.g. Bonnardeaux 1994 [112] lates aldosterone; positive association seen with PWV in hypertensive population. Benetos 1996, Lameji 2001; Bozec 2004; Gardier 2004; Mayer 2008. Association not supported by Sie 2009[103, 105, 107, 108, 110, 111] AGT (angiotensinogen) gene, M235T polymorphism associated with arte- Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others rial stiffness in 98 untreated hypertensive individuals. Bozec 2004[111] PWV and PWA Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association FBN1 (Fibrillin-1) 2/3 genotype associated with higher PWA Candidate gene study Malm 2020 [114]; Medley 2002 [115] AIx and BP in females only. Malm 2020[114] (n = 315 hyperten- sive elderly subjects); Medley 2002[115] (n = 145) PAT Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association CSK—cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, role in angiotensin II-medi- GWAS (KARE) Hong 2009 [116] ated vascular smooth muscle contraction (Hong 2010)[116] NOS3 (eNOS)—produces nitric oxide which is implicated in Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Giri 2018 [77] and others vascular smooth muscle relaxation; (Burghardt 2017)[117] APOE3/E4—a protein which is a component of lipoprotein Candidate gene study N/A (Korsakova 2018)[118] ACE—converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II, resulting in Candidate gene study Montrezol 2019 [119]; Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and increased vasoconstrictor activity; (Korsakova 2018)[118] others SPHK 1—modulates Ang II-dependent vascular dysfunction; Animal model/human data Pietro 2020 [121] (animal and human data) (Siedlinski et at., 2017)[120] ADORA1—receptor for adenosine, activity of this receptor is Linkage analysis Evangelou 2018 [90] mediated by G proteins which inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Yoshino 2016)[122] Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 70 Table 2 (continued) PAT Theorised genes, but data lacking Design Evidence of BP association SH2B3—LNK, lymphocyte-specific adaptor protein; endothelial GWAS (Global BPgen & CHARGE consortiums) Dale 2016 [125]; Newton-Cheh 2009 [123], Ference 2014 [126] cell function and vascular regeneration, though not specifi- cally reported in EndoPAT (Newton-Cheh 2009; McMaster 2014 animal model)[123, 124] PAT Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association ADORA3 strongest associations in women (member of the Linkage analysis N/A adenosine receptor group of G-protein-coupled receptors) (Yoshino 2016)[122] LPA strongest associations in women (protein encoded by this Linkage analysis Smyth 2008 [127], Wirtwein 2017 [68] gene is a serine proteinase that inhibits the activity of tissue-type plasminogen activator I) (Yoshino 2016)[122] KIF6 strongest associations in men (encodes a member of a Linkage analysis N/A family of molecular motors which are involved in intracellular transport of protein complexes) (Yoshino 2016)[122] NFKB1 strongest associations in men (a rapidly acting primary Linkage analysis N/A transcription factor found in all cell types) (Yoshino 2016)[122] FMD Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association PHACTR1 (rs9349379): encoded protein binds actin and Candidate gene study Gu 2020 [128]; Zhang 2012 [129] regulates reorganization of actin cytoskeleton, also influences vascular endothelin-1 gene expression; G allele associated with decreased FMD. Gupta 2017, n = 16,662, aggregated from six cohorts[94] NOS3 ( eNOS): Glu298 → Asp polymorphism—Nitric oxide has Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65], Nassereddine 2018 [76], Giri 2018 [77] and a role in vascular tone; associated with FMD Paradossi 2004, others n = 118; and Ingelsson 2008, n = 959 [75, 130] CD36 (rs3211938): integral membrane protein expressed by Candidate gene study Xueyan 2013 [132] many cell types, imports fatty acids and is a class B scavenger receptor. G allele impairs FMD after adjusting for differences in weight. Shibao 2016; 103 African American females [131] AT1R (synonym AGTR1): AT II acts as a vasoconstrictor and regu- Candidate gene study Numerous, see www. ensem bl. org; e.g. Bonnardeaux 1994 [112] lates aldosterone, hence blood volume: FMD reduced in C allele carriers Li et al. 2015, and Akpinar et al., 2014, n = 255 [133] CYBA (C242T polymorphism) encodes p22phox, a component Candidate gene study N/A of NADPH oxidase. FMD impaired in CC genotype; and T allele associated with higher FMD in hypertensive individuals. Fan et al. 2007, n = 2058; Rafiq 2014, n = 140; Lambrinoudaki 2018 n = 70 [81, 134, 135] APOE: FMD associated with E4 allele in stepwise regression Candidate gene study N/A analysis. Guangda 2003, n = 255 with diabetes [136] C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 71 Table 2 (continued) FMD Candidate Genes with implicated role Design Evidence of BP association NFKB1: encoding NFKB protein, a transcription regulator; Candidate gene study N/A reduced reactive forearm blood flow identified in DD genotype; Park 2007, n = 47 PDE3A: Phosphodiesterases regulate endothelial function and Linkage analysis Associated with hypertension and brachydactyly syndrome. Maass smooth muscle contraction through role in the NO/cGMP 2015 [138]; Luft 2019 [139] pathway. Traylor 2020; ALSPAC (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; n = 5214, integrated with MEGASTROKE: n = 60,341) [137] FMD Theorised genes, but data lacking or no association Design Evidence of BP association found SH2B3 (LNK—lymphocyte-specific adaptor protein)—endothe - GWAS (Global BPgen and CHARGE consortiums) Levy 2009 [140]; Ference 2014 [126], Hoffman 2016 [65]; Ehret lial cell function and vascular regeneration, not specifically 2016 [113] and others reported in FMD. Newton-Cheh 2009, also McMaster 2014 [123] ACE gene: mostly endothelial-bound, role in BP regulation and Candidate gene study Hoffman 2016 [65]; Sie 2009 [110], and others electrolyte balance through hydrolyzing angiotensin I; no effect on FMD. Akpinar 2014 and Celermajer 1994 [133, 141] FMD Studies reporting sexspecific findings Design Evidence of BP association Sex-specific multivariable models estimated similar effects GWAS (Global BPgen and CHARGE consortiums) Levy 2009 [140]; Ference 2014 [126], Hoffman 2016 [65]; Ehret of age on baseline artery diameter and FMD in mm for both 2016 [113] and others sexes. However,% FMD demonstrated age-gender interaction (P = 0.01), age effect being − 0.5 for men and − 0.7 for women. Benjamin 2004 [56] ACE gene: mostly endothelial-bound, role in BP regulation and N/A electrolyte balance through hydrolyzing angiotensin I; no effect on FMD. Akpinar 2014 and Celermajer 1994 [133, 141] CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, FMD flow-mediated dilatation, PWA pulse-wave analysis, PWV pulse-wave velocity, PAT peripheral arterial tone; BP, blood pressure, N/A not applicable (no evidence of BP association) Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 72 CIMT Lipids CYBA MCPH1 APOE E2 ATG10 SSA1 PINX1 ADAM33 Inflammation APOC1 TRAF1 SMOC1 MMP9 PIK3CG FBLN5 MMP3 VCAN WDR12 ADAMTS7 BP BCAM TIMP3 RPS23 CFDP1 CXCL12 Remodelling ATP6AP1L CBFA2T3 PINX CYP2A6/A7 EDNRA Cell cycle MIR8055 PNPT1 NOS3 MIR4693 ZHX2 GCKR Vasoactive THBS2 SCL17A2 Other PPCDC Arterial CHSY1 Stiffness COL4A1/2 MAGI1 IL6 COL1A1 Remodelling Inflammation PHACTR1 FOXO1 FBN1 BCL11B ILGF1R ACE I AGT AGTR1 BP ADRA2B IRAG PACE4 NOS3 Endothelial Cell cycle ETAR MEF2A FURIN function TCF20 Vasoactive TEX41 C1orf21 CYBA TXNIP SH2B3 Other APOE3/E4 TACR1 NFKB1 Inflammation Lipids PHACTR1 LPA CD36 Remodelling BP ADORA1 SPHK1 ADORA3 ACE CSK AT1R NOS3 Cell cycle PDE3A Vasoactive KIF6 Other Fig. 2 Gene polymorphisms relating to techniques measuring vascular health, with genes grouped according to function. Based on data in Table 2 C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 73 PWV [145]. Finally, the importance of ancestry when effect size and significant interaction with other genes and extrapolating data is highlighted by the concordance of environmental factors [151]. Further elements of the NO results derived from a common population e.g. Zekavat system implicated include PDE3A, a phosphodiesterase et al. and Fung et al. reporting UK BioBank data [85, 86], with a role in the NO/cGMP pathway. and discordant results in candidate genes and heritability Other genes have more obscure associations, such as estimates across disparate populations [52, 110]. PHACTR1 with a role in actin re-organisation but also possibly regulating vasoconstriction via endothelin-1 gene 6 Endothelial Function: Flow Mediated Dilatation expression [94]; NFKB1 encoding a protein with diverse and Peripheral Arterial Tone roles as a transcription regulator [152], and CYBA encod- 6.1 Heritability ing p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase involved in The influence of genetics on endothelial function as meas - vascular ROS generation [134, 135], see Table  2. Yoshino ured by FMD is supported by an Italian cohort of 40 et  al. studying the genetics of endothelial dysfunction healthy young people (age 6–30, 19 male) with a family report coronary vascular responses to Acetylcholine, find - history of premature myocardial infarction, demonstrat- ing 1563 SNPs connected with cardiovascular physiology ing lower FMD (5.7 ± 5.0% vs. 10.2 ± 6.6% in control sub- and pathology [122]. Variants in adenosine A1 receptor jects; P = 0.001) [146]; and by a cohort of 50 British young (ADORA 1)  were associated with endothelial dysfunction people with a family history of coronary artery disease (31 in the entire cohort, while variants in adenosine A3 recep- male, mean age 25 years) also suggesting endothelial dys- tor (ADORA 3) and lipoprotein A (LPA) had the strongest function (FMD 4.9 ± 4.6% vs 8.3 ± 3.5% in control group, associations with increased risk of endothelial dysfunction P < 0.005) [147]. Among 883 participants of the Framing- in women, again highlighting that sex differences must be ham cohort (53% female; mean age 61), estimated herita- considered within this area of research. bility (accounting for covariates) of brachial artery baseline We did not find published heritability estimates regard - diameter was 0.33 ± 0.07, and FMD% was 0.14 ± 0.06; for ing the EndoPAT assessment tool of peripheral arterial FMD%, there was an age-gender interaction (P = 0.01), tone, though both race and sex are known to influence females showing steeper age-related FMD% decline [56]. results [54, 55]. Numerous candidate genes have been pro- Twin studies tend to be preferred above family studies for posed to influence vascular endothelial function, but only heritability estimation, as they allow a more precise sepa- six of them reported have specifically been linked to PAT, ration of environmental influences from genetic effects five of the six (83 percent) had commonality with BP traits. [148], including controlling for such age effects. Twin stud - see Fig.  2. The six linked to PAT include NOS3, already ies reporting FMD heritability estimates include a Finnish discussed in regard to FMD [117]; APO E, ACE [118], and cohort reporting FMD heritability of 24%, derived from 74 Sphk1 SNPs/alleles [120]. Siedlinski [120] elegantly com- male twin pairs (20 monozygous), aged 42–69 years, with bine Sphk1 identification through murine transcriptome monozygous twins demonstrating improved FMD after analysis with in  vivo experiments confirming a role in migrating to Sweden (7.2 ± 4.4 vs 3.7 ± 2.9%, P = 0.003), a vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction, and correla- country with lower cardiovascular risk [51]. A higher esti- tion of human sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)  serum lev- mate of 39% was reported from 94 male twin pairs from els with arterial tonometry. the USA (58 monozygous pairs), mean age 55 ± 2.8  years, 95% Caucasian [57]. 7 Heritability Study Considerations BP regulation and vascular function are complex, poly- 6.2 Genes genic traits, additionally influenced by many environ - Candidate genes linked to FMD are included in Table  2, mental factors. Molecular genetic analysis is therefore 5 of the 8 (63%) also linked to hypertension, see Fig.  2. challenging due to the sheer number of relevant genes and Examples include the Asp/Asp genotype of the endothe- their polymorphic effects, as examples in Table  2 illustrate. lial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) Glu → Asp polymor- There are also certain limitations associated with heritabil - phism, which was associated with reduced vascular nitric ity studies, as follows. oxide (NO) generation (a potent vasodilator), decreased brachial artery FMD, and increased CIMT in a group of 7.1 Family Studies young healthy individuals free of traditional cardiovascular Classical family study design can overlook non-additive risk factors [75, 149]. NOS3 regulation involves receptor- genetic effects and shared environmental factors. Addi - mediated mechanisms (e.g. acetylcholine, bradykinin, and tionally, the underlying assumption regarding the genetic substance P) and mechanical stimuli (shear stress). How- relationship is flawed; offspring tend to inherit long seg - ever, NOS3 Asp298 is not unique; more than 100 poly- ments of DNA resulting in deviations from the expected morphisms in NOS3 have been identified [150], with small 50% DNA inheritance from each parent. Furthermore, Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 74 family studies often recruit based on participant phe-8 Vascular phenotype notype, with family members then invited to partici- Various genes in Table  2 appear numerous times sug- pate. However, techniques to correct for ascertainment gesting effects on multiple vascular function assessment bias should be employed, such as Hopper and Mathews techniques. For example ACE, which cleaves angiotensin method which adjusts the heritability estimate based on I into angiotensin II with vasoconstrictive effects; ACE the mean and total variance of the genetic and environ- also stimulates the production of aldosterone, increas- mental components for each individual family grouping ing absorption of salt and water in the kidneys; ACE fur- [153]. thermore causes inactivation of the vasoactive mediator bradykinin. It is therefore not surprising that genetic poly- morphisms of ACE impact on many of the vascular assess- 7.2 Missing Heritability ment techniques described. Similarly, NOS3 (endothelial Another issue is ‘missing heritability’, i.e., the disparity nitric oxide synthase) has been identified as relevant in between heritability estimates derived from genotype data multiple assessment tools of vascular function, with local (explaining a low proportion of the variance), and from vasodilatory regulation of vascular tone and diameter (see twin studies (estimating significantly higher heritability). Table  2). Other genes or polymorphisms appear specific Missing heritability is likely a consequence of restriction to the technique or vascular trait, such as SAA1 in CIMT, of many genetic association studies to SNPs—missing COL4A in arterial stiffness (PWV), and CYBA encod- rare mutations. Gene-by-gene interactions, epigenetics, ing p22phox, a component of NADPH oxidase in FMD. and gene-by-environment interactions also contribute Some furthermore show a gene by sex interaction, such to missing heritability, through assumptions that such as VCAN locus in females, encoding a chondroitin sul- interactions are minimal, identifiable, and that variance fate proteoglycan of the adventitia and intima in CIMT explained by shared environmental factors is identical in [44], and NOS3 rs1799983 relating to central pulse pres- pairs. Such assumptions risk inflating heritability estimates sure and forward wave amplitude parameters again only by attributing the contribution of environmental factors to in females [98]. Others appear to only reach significance in genetics. those with hypertension, suggesting gene by gene or gene by environment interactions e.g. CYBA T allele associated with higher FMD only in hypertensive individuals [154]. These highlight the importance of comprehensive demo - 7.3 Directionality graphic reporting and consideration of such factors when Directionality is an inherent challenge when assessing comparing data from multiple sources. Finally, fewer stud- genotypic influences effecting vascular traits: differentiat - ies were identified reporting the genetics of measures of ing if an identified gene has a direct impact on e.g., PWV, endothelial function (FMD and PAT) compared to those or alternatively elevates BP which in turn leads to arterial relating to vascular stiffness and remodeling/atherosclero - remodeling, stiffness, and results in elevated PWV. The sis; we would propose this as an area for future study. Of high proportion of identified genetic loci and candidate note, no single gene or SNP discussed here demonstrates a genes common to both vascular phenotypes and hyperten- substantial association with the vascular traits and assess- sion outlined in Table 2 and Fig. 2 highlights this. ment techniques covered. This is to be expected in poly - genic traits, but may also reflect features of study design identified above: necessity for standardised technique with 7.4 Design these tools, underpowering and lack of external validation Most data are cross-sectional in nature, from which cohorts among many studies, gene–gene or gene– envi- change over time in vascular function or BP cannot be ronment interactions. Comparisons between different inferred. One might also hypothesize that SNPs contribut- demographic groups are also complicated if age, sex, race, ing to vascular ageing for example may influence PWV at and BP are not fully adjusted for. Researchers should be 60  years of age, but not at 30. Studies that do report her- cognizant of these in future studies. itability of baseline measures and progression, have found discrepancies [40]; therefore, duration of follow up, or population age of cross-sectional data must be reported in detail. Future studies independently confirming heritabil -9 Sex‑Differences ity of vascular traits and candidate genes, as well as their Gene-by-sex interaction may not always be captured by independence from each other and from BP are required, GWAS. Efforts to elucidate sex-specific genomic deter - and will determine the utility of vascular assessment tech- minants of BP demonstrated in 120 Canadian families niques as surrogate endpoints in trials, separate from their found that one quarter of the 539 hemodynamic, anthro- use as predictive risk tools. pometric, metabolic, and humoral traits studied were C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 75 Funding both age and sex dependent, and one eighth were exclu- E. Murray received European Research Council funding to undertake an MD as sively age or sex dependent [155]. part of the Inflammatension Study (Grant number ERC-2016-COG awarded to A vascular phenotypic divide related to participant Prof T Guzik). sex may also exist, demonstrating greater discrimina- Data Availability tion between normotensive and hypertensive PWV and All data pertaining to this manuscript are already freely available and full refer- augmentation index for females than males [16] and sup- ences including DOI have been provided to facilitate access to data. ported by our own unit’s experience (unpublished). Con- versely, a collaboration establishing reference values for Declarations PWV describe apparent sex differences being almost fully Conflict of interest accounted for by age and BP differences [156]. Two points The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. therefore to consider if undertaking or analysing vascular Ethics Approval function data, is whether the groups were well matched or As a review of published literature, ethics approval was not required. adjustments for age and BP applied, and we  suggest that researchers should also report outcome data stratified by Consent for Publication Not applicable. sex to facilitate interpretation. Received: 15 August 2021 Accepted: 26 April 2022 Published online: 1 June 2022 10 Conclusion In conclusion, CIMT, PWV/PWA, FMD and PAT offer utility as surrogate markers of atherosclerosis, arterial References 1. UK, “Office of National Statistics,” www. ons. gov. uk , 2020. stiffening, endothelial and microcirculatory function i.e. 2. C Vlachopoulos et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and vascular function, and are predictive of cardiovascular secondary prevention. A position paper from the European society of risk. They may also have an increasing role as surrogate cardiology working group on peripheral circulation. Endorsed by the association for research into arterial structure and physiology (ARTERY, endpoints in genomic studies and clinical trials [157], Atherosclerosis, vol. 241, no. 2. Elsevier, pp. 507–532, 01-Aug-2015. however sex differences remain contentious, and dissect - 3. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common ing genetic associations independent from hypertension is carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarc- tion: the Rotterdam study. Circulation. 1997;96(5):1432–7. challenging. The genetics underlying these vascular assess - 4. Stein JH et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular ment techniques have been variably studied, CIMT more disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement so than PAT. The genetics of hypertension has a broad lit - from the american society of echocardiography carotid intima-media thickness task force endorsed by the society for vascular medicine, J Am erature base; the next step is to integrate characterization Soc Echocardiography, 21(2). Mosby Inc., pp. 93–111, 2008. of vascular and hypertensive phenotypes with genotypes 5. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical as a natural symbiosis in studying the pathophysiology of cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. Jan. 2007;115(4):459–67. hypertension and cardiovascular disease, and to better 6. Ferreira JP et al. (2016) Intima-media thickness is linearly and continu- personalize cardiovascular medicine. ously associated with systolic blood pressure in a population-based cohort (STANISLAS cohort study), J. Am. Heart Assoc., 5(6). 7. Hodis HN et al. (1998) The role of carotid arterial intima - Media thickness Abbreviations in predicting clinical coronary events, Ann Intern Med ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; AD: Autosomal dominant; AR: Autosomal 8. Espeland MA, O’Leary DH, Terry JG, Morgan T, Evans G, Mudra H Carotid recessive; AIx: Augmentation index; AI@75: Augmentation index adjusted to intimal-media thickness as a surrogate for cardiovascular disease events 75 bpm; AT II: Angiotensin II; BMI: Body mass index; BP: Blood pressure; CIMT: in trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, Curr Controlled Trials Cardio- Carotid intima-media thickness; cGMP: Guanosine monophosphate; CVD: Car- vasc Med 6(1). BioMed Central Ltd., 10-Mar-2005. diovascular disease; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid; 9. Laurent S, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause DZ: Dizygous; FMD: Flow-mediated dilatation; GWAS: Genome wide association and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. studies; h : Heritability; miRNA: Micro ribonucleic acid; MZ: Monozygous; N/A: 2001;37(5):1236–41. Not applicable; NO: Nitric oxide; PAT: Peripheral artery tonometry; PWA: Pulse- 10. Boutouyrie P et al. (2002) Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of wave analysis; PWV: Pulse-wave velocity; RNA: Ribonucleic acid; SBP: Systolic primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study, blood pressure; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism; SSA: Serum amyloid A. Hypertens. (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 39(1): 10–15. 11. Mitchell GF, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the framing- Acknowledgements ham heart study. Circulation. 2010;121(4):505–11. We additionally wish to acknowledge Prof T. Guzik, University of Glasgow, for a 12. Ohkuma T, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and the risk prediction supervisory role. of cardiovascular disease an individual participant data meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2017;69(6):1045–52. Author Contributions 13. Van Sloten TT, et al. Carotid stiffness is associated with incident stroke: All authors contributed to study design and manuscript writing, and approved a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. J Am the final version. ECM and AC additionally contributed to the literature search, Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(19):2116–25. data gathering and analysis. 14. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(13):1318–27. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 76 15. Kim SK, Massett MP Genetic regulation of endothelial vasomotor func- 39. Sacco RL, et al. Heritability and linkage analysis for carotid intima- tion, Front Physiol 7, no. NOV. Frontiers Media S.A., p. 571, 25-Nov-2016. media thickness: the family study of stroke risk and carotid atheroscle- 16. Nardin C, et al. Cardiovascular phenotype of elevated blood pressure rosis. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2307–12. differs markedly between young males and females the ENIGMA study. 40. Cecelja M, et al. Arterial stiffening is a heritable trait associated with Hypertension. 2018;72(6):1277–84. arterial dilation but not wall thickening: a longitudinal study in the 17. Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM. Unusual hypertensive pheno- twins UK cohort. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(24):2282–8. types: What is their significance? Hypertension. 2012;59(2):173–8. 41. Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, et al. Heritability of the function and structure of 18. Murray E, Guzik T, Delles C. Early hypertension: exploring the vascular the arterial wall: findings of the Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study. phenotype. J Hypertens. 2021;39(Supplement 1):e44–5. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2351–6. 19. Tarnoki AD, et al. Heritability of central blood pressure and arterial stiff- 42. Armstrong C, Abilleira S, Sitzer M, Markus HS, Bevan S. Polymorphisms ness: a twin study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(8):1564–71. in MMP family and TIMP genes and carotid artery intima-media thick- 20. van Rijn MJE, et al. Heritability of blood pressure traits and the genetic ness. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2895–9. contribution to blood pressure variance explained by four blood-pres- 43. Zabalza M et al. Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Genetic sure-related genes. J Hypertens. 2007;25(3):565–70. Variants and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: An Association Study and 21. Levy D, et al. Evidence for a gene influencing blood pressure on chromo - Meta-analysis, Rev. Española Cardiol. (English Ed., 68(10):869–877, Oct. some 17: Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal blood pressure 2015. phenotypes in subjects from the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 44. Strawbridge RJ et al. Carotid intima-media thickness novel loci, sex- 2000;36(4):477–83. specific effects, and genetic correlations with obesity and glucometa- 22. Alwan H, et al. Heritability of ambulatory and office blood pressure in the bolic traits in UK Biobank, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020. Swiss population. J Hypertens. 2015;33(10):2061–7. 45. Wight TN (2002) Versican: A versatile extracellular matrix proteoglycan 23. Celermajer DS, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dys- in cell biology, Curr Opin Cell Biol. function in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 46. Carty CL, et al. Association of genetic variation in serum amyloid-A 1992;340(8828):1111–5. with cardiovascular disease and interactions with IL6, IL1RN, IL1β and 24. Carvajal CA et al. (2011) Familial hyperaldosteronism a new presentation TNF genes in the cardiovascular health study. J Atheroscler Thromb. of the chimeric CYP11B1/CYP11B2 gene with low prevalence of primary 2009;16(4):419–30. aldosteronism and atypical gene segregation pattern. 47. Wang L, Colón W. The interaction between apolipoprotein serum amy- 25. Ise T, et al. A chimeric CYP11B1/CYP11B2 gene in glucocorticoid- loid A and high-density lipoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. insuppressible familial hyperaldosteronism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ). 2004;317(1):157–61. 2001;55(1):131–4. 48. Xie X, et al. Polymorphisms in the SAA1/2 gene are associated with 26. Mulatero P, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of familial hyperaldoster- carotid intima media thickness in healthy han chinese subjects: the onism: The PATOGEN study (Primary aldosteronism in TOrino-GENetic cardiovascular risk survey. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11): e13997. forms). Hypertension. 2011;58(5):797–803. 49. Johnson BD, et al. Serum amyloid a as a predictor of coronary artery 27. Jordan J, et al. Severely impaired baroreflex-buffering in patients with disease and cardiovascular outcome in women: the national heart, monogenic hypertension and neurovascular contact. Circulation. lung, and blood institute-sponsored women’s ischemia syndrome 2000;102(21):2611–8. evaluation ( WISE). Circulation. 2004;109(6):726–32. 28. Burrello J, et al. Is There a Role for Genomics in the Management of 50. Fox CS, et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to athero- Hypertension? Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1131. sclerosis phenotypes in men and women: heritability of carotid 29. Padmanabhan S, Joe B. Towards Precision Medicine for Hyperten- intima-media thickness in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. sion: A Review of Genomic, Epigenomic, and Microbiomic Eec ff ts on 2003;34(2):397–401. Blood Pressure in Experimental Rat Models and Humans. Physiol Rev. 51. Jartti L, et al. Population-based twin study of the effects of migration 2017;97(4):1469–528. from Finland to Sweden on endothelial function and intima-media 30. Friso S, et al. Epigenetic control of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydroge- thickness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(5):832–7. nase 2 gene promoter is related to human hypertension. Atherosclerosis. 52. Mitchell GF, et al. Heritability and a genome-wide linkage scan for 2008;199(2):323–7. arterial stiffness, wave reflection, and mean arterial pressure: The 31. Hu W, Wang H, Huang H. Analysis of gene expression and preliminary Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2005;112(2):194–9. study of methylation about 11β-HSD2 gene in placentas of Chinese 53. Ge D, Young TW, Wang X, Kapuku GK, Treiber FA, Snieder H (2007) pre-eclampsia patients of Han ethnicity. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. Heritability of Arterial Stiffness in Black and White American Youth and 2015;41(3):343–9. Young Adults, Am J Hypertens. 32. Lee HA, Cho HM, Lee DY, Kim KC, Han HS, Kim IK. Tissue-specific upregula- 54. Mulukutla SR, et al. Black race is associated with digital artery endothe- tion of angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 in spontaneously hypertensive lial dysfunction: results from the Heart SCORE study. Eur Heart J. rats through histone code modifications. Hypertension. 2012;59(3):621–6. 2010;31(22):2808–15. 33. Wise IA, Charchar FJ Epigenetic modifications in essential hypertension, 55. Schnabel RB, et al. Noninvasive vascular function measurement in the Int J Mol Sci 17(4). MDPI AG, p. 451, 25-Mar-2016. community cross-sectional relations and comparison of methods. Circ 34. Niiranen TJ, et al. Risk for hypertension crosses generations in Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(4):371–80. the community: a multi-generational cohort study. Eur Heart J. 56. Benjamin EJ, et al. Clinical Correlates and Heritability of Flow-Mediated 2017;38(29):2300–8. Dilation in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 35. Ramirez LA, Sullivan JC Sex differences in hypertension: Where we have 2004;109(5):613–9. been and where we are going, Am J Hypertension, 31(12). Oxford Univer- 57. Zhao J, et al. Heritability of flow-mediated dilation: a twin study. J sity Press, pp. 1247–1254, 13-Nov-2018. Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(12):2386–92. 36. Paiva AMG, et al. Impact of hypertension phenotypes on the office 58. Larsson E, et al. Hypertension and genetic variation in endothelial- and 24-h pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in individu- specific genes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):62035. als with or without antihypertensive medication use. Hypertens Res. 59. Liu T, et al. Association between daily cigarette consumption and 2019;42(12):1989–95. hypertension moderated by CYP2A6 genotypes in Chinese male cur- 37. Yan RT, Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title L, Verma S, Lonn E (2005) rent smokers. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27(1):24–30. Relationship between carotid artery intima-media thickness and brachial 60. Natarajan P, et al. Multiethnic exome-wide association study of sub- artery flow-mediated dilation in middle-aged healthy men, J Am Coll clinical atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9(6):511–20. Cardiol 61. Bis JC, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies 38. North KE, et al. Heritability of carotid artery structure and func- from the CHARGE consortium identifies common variants associ- tion: the strong heart family study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. ated with carotid intima media thickness and plaque. Nat Genet. 2002;22(10):1698–703. 2011;43(10):940–8. C raig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 77 62. Feitosa MF et al (2018) Novel genetic associations for blood pressure 85. Zekavat SM, et al. Genetic association of finger photoplethysmography- identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across derived arterial stiffness index with blood pressure and coronary artery multiple ancestries, PLoS One, 13(6). disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(6):1253–61. 63. López-Mejías R et al. (2014) Lack of association between ABO, PPAP2B, 86. Fung K, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci for arterial ADAMST7, PIK3CG, and EDNRA and carotid intima-media thickness, stiffness index in 127,121 UK Biobank participants OPEN. Nat Sci Rep. carotid plaques, and cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid 2019;9:9143. arthritis, Mediators Inflamm 2014. 87. Qi Y, et al. Novel mechanism of blood pressure regulation by forkhead 64. Carnevale D, Lembo G PI3Kγ in hypertension: A novel therapeutic target box class O1-mediated transcriptional control of hepatic angiotensino- controlling vascular myogenic tone and target organ damage, Cardio- gen. Hypertension. 2014;64(5):1131–40. vasc Res, vol. 95, no. 4. Oxford Academic, pp. 403–408, 01-Sep-2012. 88. Desch M et al. (2010) IRAG determines nitric oxide-and atrial natriuretic 65. Hoffmann TJ et al. (2017) Genome-wide association analyses using peptide-mediated smooth muscle relaxation, Cardiovasc Res. electronic health records identify new loci influencing blood pressure 89. Tarasov KV, et al. COL4A1 is associated with arterial stiffness by genome- variation, Nat Genet wide association scan. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2(2):151–8. 66. Warren HR, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel 90. Evangelou E, et al. Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identi- blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. fies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat Genet. Nat Genet. 2022;49(3):403–15. 2018;50(10):1412–25. 67. van SJ et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study of coronary and 91. Levy D, et al. Framingham heart study 100K project: genome-wide aortic calcification implicates risk loci for coronary artery disease and associations for blood pressure and arterial stiffness. BMC Med Genet. myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis 228(2): 400–405. 2007;8(SUPPL. 1):S3. 68. Wirtwein M, et al. Elevated ambulatory systolic-diastolic pressure 92. Mitchell GF, et al. Common genetic variation in the 3β-BCL11B gene regression index is genetically determined in hypertensive patients with desert is associated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and excess coronary heart disease. Blood Press. 2017;26(3):174–80. cardiovascular disease risk the aortagen consortium. Circ Cardiovasc 69. Jj M, et al. Large scale association analysis for identification of genes Genet. 2012;5(1):81–90. underlying premature coronary heart disease: cumulative perspective 93. Rimpelä JM, et al. Genome-wide association study of nocturnal from analysis of 111 candidate genes. J Med Genet. 2004;41(5):334–41. blood pressure dipping in hypertensive patients. BMC Med Genet. 70. Gertow K, et al. Identification of the BCAR1-CFDP1-TMEM170A locus as 2018;19(1):1–11. a determinant of carotid intima-media thickness and coronary artery 94. Gupta RM, et al. A genetic variant associated with five vascular diseases is disease risk. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012;5(6):656–65. a distal regulator of endothelin-1 gene expression. Cell. 2017;170(3):522- 71. Arya R, et al. A genetic association study of carotid intima-media thick- 533.e15. ness (CIMT ) and plaque in Mexican Americans and European Americans 95. Schutte AE, Volpe M, Tocci G, Conti E. Revisiting the relationship with rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis. 2018;271:92–101. between blood pressure and insulin-like growth factor-1. Hypertension. 72. Nandakumar P, et al. Analysis of putative cis-regulatory elements regulat- 2014;63(5):1070–7. ing blood pressure variation. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(11):1922–32. 96. Li JP, et al. The association between paired basic amino acid cleaving 73. Vojinovic D et al. (2018) Whole-genome linkage scan combined with enzyme 4 gene haplotype and diastolic blood pressure. Chin Med J exome sequencing identifies novel candidate genes for carotid intima- (Engl). 2004;117(3):382–8. media thickness, Front Genet 9, no. OCT, pp 1–10 97. Ehret GB, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pres- 74. Ali AT, Boehme L, Carbajosa G, Seitan VC, Small KS, Hodgkinson A (2019) sure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478(7367):103–9. Nuclear genetic regulation of the human mitochondrial transcriptome, 98. Mitchell GF, et al. Vascular stiffness and genetic variation at the endothe - Elife 8 lial nitric oxide synthase locus: the framingham heart study. Hyperten- 75. Paradossi U, Ciofini E, Clerico A, Botto N, Biagini A, Colombo MG. sion. 2007;49(6):1285–90. Endothelial function and carotid intima-media thickness in young 99. Alvim RO, Santos PCJL, Ferreira NE, Mill JG, Krieger JE, Pereira AC. Thiore- healthy subjects among endothelial nitric oxide synthase Glu298→Asp doxin interacting protein ( TXNIP) rs7212 polymorphism is associated and T-786→C polymorphisms. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1305–9. with arterial stiffness in the Brazilian general population. J Hum Hyper - 76. Nassereddine S, et al. The polymorphism G894T of endothelial nitric tens. 2012;26(5):340–2. oxide synthase (eNOS) gene is associated with susceptibility to essential 100. Brull DJ, et al. Eec ff t of a COL1A1 Sp1 binding site polymorphism on hypertension (EH) in Morocco. BMC Med Genet. 2018;19(1):1–8. arterial pulse wave velocity: an index of compliance. Hypertension. 77. Giri A et al. (2019) Trans-ethnic association study of blood pressure deter- 2001;38(3):444–8. minants in over 750,000 individuals, Nat Genet. 101. Lajemi M et al. (2001) Endothelin gene variants and aortic and cardiac 78. Dhingra R, et al. Relations of matrix remodeling biomarkers to blood structure in never-treated hypertensives, Am J Hypertens 14(8) I, pp. pressure progression and incidence of Hypertension in the community. 755–760. Circulation. 2009;119(8):1101–7. 102. Mattace-Raso FUS, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymor- 79. Beilby JP, Chapman CML, Palmer LJ, McQuillan BM, Thompson PL, phism and common carotid stiffness: The Rotterdam study. Atherosclero - Hung J. Stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) gene 5A/6A promoter polymorphism is sis. 2004;174(1):121–6. associated with blood pressure in a community population. J Hypertens. 103. Benetos A et al. Influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme and 2005;23(3):537–42. angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms on aortic stiffness in 80. Liu X, et al. Associations between polymorphisms of the CXCL12 normotensive and hypertensive patients, Circulation 1996. and CNNM2 gene and hypertension risk: a case-control study. Gene. 104. Dima I, et al. Association of arterial stiffness with the angiotensin-convert - 2018;675:185–90. ing enzyme gene polymorphism in healthy individuals. Am J Hypertens. 81. Lambrinoudaki I, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness 2008;21(12):1354–8. in premenopausal women: association with NOS3 and CYBA polymor- 105. Lajemi M (2001) et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-153A/G and 1166A/C phisms. Heart Vessels. 2018;33(12):1434–44. gene polymorphisms and increase in aortic stiffness with age in hyper - 82. Zhang L, et al. Lack of associations of ten candidate coronary heart tensive subjects, J Hypertens. disease risk genetic variants and subclinical atherosclerosis in four U.S. 106. Benetos A et al. (1995) Influence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor poly- populations: the population architecture using genomics and epidemiol- morphism on aortic stiffness in never-treated hypertensive patients, in ogy (PAGE) study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228(2):390–9. Hypertension. 83. Zhang X, Liu L, Gu R, Wang X (2019) Association between the ADAMT33 107. Gardier S, Vincent M, Lantelme P, Rial MO, Bricca G, Milon H (2004) variant and carotid artery intima-media thickness in the Chinese Han A1166C polymorphism of angiotensin II type 1 receptor, blood pressure population and arterial stiffness in hypertension, J Hypertens 84. Heßler N, et al. Linkage and association analysis identifies TRAF1 influenc- 108. Mayer O, Filipovský J, Pešta M, Cífková R, Dolejšová M, Šimon J (2008) Syner- ing common carotid intima-media thickness. Stroke. 2016;47:2904–9. gistic effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms on arterial stiffness, J Hum Hypertens. Craig et al. Artery Research (2022) 28:61–78 78 109. Taniwaki H, et al. Association of ACE gene polymorphism with arterial stiffness 134. Fan M, et al. CYBA C242T gene polymorphism and flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(11):1858–64. in a population of young adults: The cardiovascular risk in young finns study. 110. Sie MPS et al. (2009) Genetic variation in the renin-angiotensin system and J Hypertens. 2007;25(7):1381–7. arterial stiffness. the rotterdam study, Clin Exp Hypertens. 135. Rafiq A, Aslam K, Malik R, Afroze D. C242T polymorphism of the NADPH 111. Bozec E et al. Arterial stiffness and angiotensinogen gene in hypertensive oxidase p22PHOX gene and its association with endothelial dysfunction in patients and mutant mice, J Hypertens. asymptomatic individuals with essential systemic hypertension. Mol Med 112. Bonnardeaux A et al. (1994) Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymor- Rep. 2014;9(5):1857–62. phisms in human essential hypertension, Hypertension. 136. Guangda X, Yuhua W. Apolipoprotein e4 allele and endothelium-dependent 113. Ehret GB et al. (2016) The genetics of blood pressure regulation and its target arterial dilation in Type 2 diabetes mellitus without angiopathy. Diabetolo- organs from association studies in 342,415 individuals, Nat Genet. gia. 2003;46(4):514–9. 114. Åström Malm I, Alehagen U, Blomstrand P, Dahlström U, De Basso R (2020) 137. Traylor M, et al. Influence of genetic variation in PDE3A on endothelial function Higher blood pressure in elderly hypertensive females, with increased arte- and stroke. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):365–71. rial stiffness and blood pressure in females with the Fibrillin-1 2/3 genotype, 138. Maass PG, et al. PDE3A mutations cause autosomal dominant hypertension BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20(1). with brachydactyly. Nat Genet. 2015;47(6):647–53. 115. Medley TL, Cole TJ, Gatzka CD, Wang WYS, Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Fibrillin-1 139. Luft FC et al. (2019) Abstract 039: The PDE3A gene regulates blood pressure, genotype is associated with aortic stiffness and disease severity in patients Hypertension 74(Suppl_1). with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002;105(7):810–5. 140. Levy D, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hyperten- 116. Hong KW, et al. Genetic variations in ATP2B1, CSK, ARSG and CSMD1 loci are sion. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):677–87. related to blood pressure and/or hypertension in two Korean cohorts. J 141. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Barley J, Jeffrey S, Carter N, Deanfield J. Angio - Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(6):367–72. tensin-converting enzyme genotype is not associated with endothelial 117. Burghardt KJ, Grove TB, Ellingrod VL. Endothelial nitric oxide synthetase genetic dysfunction in subjects without other coronary risk factors. Atherosclerosis. variants, metabolic syndrome and endothelial function in schizophrenia. J 1994;111(1):121–6. Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(4):349–56. 142. Logan JG, Engler MB, Kim H. Genetic Determinants of Arterial Stiffness. Adv 118. Korsakova N et al. Genetic polymorphisms as risk factors of endothelial dys- Data Anal Classif. Feb. 2015;9(1):23–43. function in pregnant women, in European Hematology Association, 2018, 143. Lacolley P, Challande P, Osborne-Pellegrin M, Regnault V. Genetics and patho- PB2508. physiology of arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;81(4):637–48. 119. Montrezol FT, et al. ACE gene plays a key role in reducing blood pressure in 144. Salvi P et al. (2008) Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave veloc- the hyperintensive elderly after resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. ity estimation, J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33(4):1119–29. 145. Van Bortel LM, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of 120. Siedlinski M, et al. Vascular transcriptome profiling identifies Sphingosine aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J kinase 1 as a modulator of angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction. Sci Hypertens. 2012;30(3):445–8. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13. 146. Gaeta G, et al. Arterial abnormalities in the offspring of patients with premature 121. Di Pietro D, Oliveti M, Sommella E, Al E Sortilin evokes endothelial dysfunc- myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(12):840–6. tion and arterial hypertension through the dysregulation of sphingolipid 147. Clarkson P, Celermajer DS, Powe AJ, Donald AE, Henry RMA, Deanfield metabolism and oxidative stress, in ESC Congress 2020—The Digital Experi- JE. Endothelium-dependent dilatation is impaired in young healthy ence—Programme, 2020. subjects with a family history of premature coronary disease. Circulation. 122. Yoshino S et al (2016) Sex-specific genetic variants are associated with coro - 1997;96(10):3378–83. nary endothelial dysfunction, J Am Heart Assoc 5(4). 148. MacGregor AJ, Snieder H, Schork NJ, Spector TD Twins—novel uses to study 123. Newton-Cheh C, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci complex traits and genetic diseases, Trends in Genetics 16(3). Trends Genet, associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):666–76. pp. 131–134, 01-Mar-2000. 124. McMaster W, Saleh M, Kirabo M, Itani H, Harrison D, Madhur M (2022) Defi- 149. Persu A, et al. Modifier effect of ENOS in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney ciency of LNK/SH2B3 promotes hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(3):229–41. aortic dissection, Angiogenesis, vol. 17, no. Developmental Vascular Biology 150. Jones LC, Hingorani AD. Genetic regulation of endothelial function. Heart. and Genetics Workshop VI and Vascular Inflammation Workshop organized 2005;91(10):1275–7. by NAVBO: ABSTRACTS, pp. 935–984, 2014. 151. Casas JP, Bautista LE, Humphries SE, Hingorani AD. Endothelial nitric oxide 125. Dale BL, Madhur MS Linking Inflammation and Hypertension via LNK/SH2B3. synthase genotype and ischemic heart disease: meta-analysis of 26 studies 126. Ference BA, Julius S, Mahajan N, Levy PD, Williams KA, Flack JM. Clinical effect involving 23 028 subjects. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1359–65. of naturally random allocation to lower systolic blood pressure beginning 152. Park JY, et al. NFKB1 promoter variation implicates shear-induced NOS3 gene before the development of hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;63(6):1182–8. expression and endothelial function in prehypertensives and stage I hyper- 127. Smyth SS, Cheng HY, Miriyala S, Panchatcharam M, Morris AJ Roles of lysophos- tensives. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol. 2007;293(4):H2320. phatidic acid in cardiovascular physiology and disease, Biochimica et 153. Hopper JL, Mathews JD. A multivariate normal model for pedigree and longi- Biophysica Acta—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1781(9). NIH Public tudinal data and the software ‘fisher.’ Aust J Stat. 1994;36(2):153–76. Access, pp. 563–570, Sep-2008. 154. Rafiq K, Nishiyama A (2014) Is antioxidant therapy effective for advanced 128. Gu K, Zhang Y, Sun K, Jiang X (2020) Associations between PHACTR1 gene hypertension and renal injury?, J Hypertens. polymorphisms and pulse pressure in Chinese Han population, Biosci Rep. 155. S. ˇ eda O et al. Systematic, genome-wide, sex-specific linkage of cardiovascular 40(6). traits in french canadians,” 2008. 129. Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide linkage and association scans for pulse pressure 156. Mattace-Raso FUS, et al. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people in Chinese twins. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(11):1051–7. and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and 130. Ingelsson E, Syvänen AC, Lind L. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in reference values.’ Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2338–50. conduit and resistance vessels in relation to the endothelial nitric oxide 157. Alexander Y et al. (2021) Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a synthase gene. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(8):569–78. consensus paper of the European society of cardiology working groups on 131. Shibao CA, et al. A Common CD36 Variant Influences Endothelial Function atherosclerosis and vascular biology, aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, and Response to Treatment with Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibition. J Clin coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation, and Thr, Cardiovasc. Res.. Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(7):2751–8. 132. Liu X, Meng F, Yang P. Association study of CD36 single nucleotide polymor- phisms with essential hypertension in the Northeastern Han Chinese. Gene. 2013;527(1):410–5. 133. Akpinar TS, et al. Endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase, angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms and endothelial functions in healthy individuals. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(1):39–45.

Journal

Artery ResearchSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2022

Keywords: Heritability; Genetic; Vascular; Arterial stiffening; Endothelial; CIMT

There are no references for this article.