Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Joachim (2011)
A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza
R. Mason (1997)
The God of Spinoza : a philosophical study
E. Curley (1969)
Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation
R. Brandom (2008)
Adequacy and the Individuation of Ideas In Spinoza's EthicsJournal of the History of Philosophy, 14
H. Hallett (1932)
Aeternitas : a Spinozistic studyThe Philosophical Review, 41
E. Harris (1973)
Salvation from Despair
Eugene Garver (2018)
Spinoza and the Cunning of Imagination
A. Watt (1972)
The Causality of God in Spinoza’s PhilosophyCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 2
T. Mark (1972)
Spinoza's theory of truth
D. Steinberg (1981)
Spinoza's Theory of the Eternity of the MindCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 11
P. Bayle, R. Popkin, Craig Brush (1965)
Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections
Francis Haserot, R. Saw (1951)
The vindication of metaphysics
Katherine Gilbert, G. Richter (1914)
Spinozas Philosophische Terminologie.The Philosophical Review, 23
J. Stetter, C. Ramond (2019)
Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy
R. Saw (1969)
Personal identity in SpinozaInquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 12
M. Wilson (1983)
Infinite Understanding, Scientia Intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8
J. Lennox (1976)
The Causality of Finite Modes in Spinoza's EthicsCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 6
M. Grene (1973)
Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays
B. Spinoza, C. Gebhardt
Abhandlung über die Verbesserung des Verstandes. Abhandlung vom Staate
Karolina Hübner (2016)
Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of ReasonPacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97
Lee Rice (1971)
Spinoza on IndividuationThe Monist, 55
E. Ritchie
The Reality of the Finite in Spinoza's SystemThe Philosophical Review, 13
[The status of individual things in Substance raises a crucial problem for Spinoza’s philosophy. Spinoza interchangeably employs individua, singulares, and particula. For instance, 1p25c mentions res particulares, yet 2p1d, referring to 1p24c, mentions res singulares, as if there is no difference between particulares and singulares. Moreover, Spinoza refers to a body, which according to 2a5 is res singulares, as to Individuum (2L4 [following 2p13] and 2p27d), and Nature as a whole is also considered as Individuum (2L7s). As if paradoxically, that body and Nature as a whole are complex beings. This is acceptable in the Ethics since Spinoza states that as far as several individua “concur in one action that together they are all the cause of one effect, I consider them all, to that extent, as one singular thing [ut unam rem singularem]” (2def7). Still, as we shall realize, singulares and particulares may have different meanings.]
Published: Aug 11, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.