Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Rumor of Empathy: Rewriting Empathy in the Context of PhilosophyRewriting Empathy in Max Scheler

A Rumor of Empathy: Rewriting Empathy in the Context of Philosophy: Rewriting Empathy in Max Scheler [Max Scheler provides a penetrating phenomenological inquiry into diverse forms of sympathy in which he explicitly includes “empathy.” Scheler’s inquiry and phenomenological analysis of vicarious feeling and experience is especially penetrating as Scheler explicitly raises the philosophical problem of other minds and criticizes the approaches of the argument from analogy and Theodor Lipps’ “projective empathy.” Scheler’s own inquiry into vicarious feeling identifies experiences that have not been adequately recognized and described as enabling the accessibility of the other individual within the context of radical relatedness to the other. Scheler privileges his own theory, Fremdwahrnehmung, or the perception of the other (alter ego), but arguably goes astray into a pan-psychism and empirical impasse.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Rumor of Empathy: Rewriting Empathy in the Context of PhilosophyRewriting Empathy in Max Scheler

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-rumor-of-empathy-rewriting-empathy-in-the-context-of-philosophy-jKtkBkshAq

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
ISBN
978-1-349-50462-6
Pages
83 –96
DOI
10.1057/9781137465344_6
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Max Scheler provides a penetrating phenomenological inquiry into diverse forms of sympathy in which he explicitly includes “empathy.” Scheler’s inquiry and phenomenological analysis of vicarious feeling and experience is especially penetrating as Scheler explicitly raises the philosophical problem of other minds and criticizes the approaches of the argument from analogy and Theodor Lipps’ “projective empathy.” Scheler’s own inquiry into vicarious feeling identifies experiences that have not been adequately recognized and described as enabling the accessibility of the other individual within the context of radical relatedness to the other. Scheler privileges his own theory, Fremdwahrnehmung, or the perception of the other (alter ego), but arguably goes astray into a pan-psychism and empirical impasse.]

Published: Sep 23, 2015

Keywords: community; Einfühlung; empathy; Fremdwahrnehmung; Max Scheler; other minds; the other; Theodor Lipps; vicarious feeling

There are no references for this article.