Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Social History of Administrative Science in ItalyThe Deinstitutionalisation of Administrative Science

A Social History of Administrative Science in Italy: The Deinstitutionalisation of Administrative... [This chapter, after analysing the cultural and political reasons that led the new Catholic University of Milan to invest in the autonomy of Administrative Science in the 1920s and 1930s—the only case in Italy—explains Fascism’s lack of interest of in that knowledge. The regime, in fact, despite having founded an entire faculty (Political Sciences) and some schools of corporate studies to counter liberal legal science’s monopoly on the formation of State elites, allowed Administrative Science to wither until its complete deinstitutionalisation. The chapter looks at a new network (core/periphery) constructed using the competition sources, identifies the jurists who had the power to establish the dominant nomos of the “administrative disciplines” from the end of the Great War to 1935. To outline the specific and strategic contribution of some jurists and their relationships with the political field, the chapter also traces some biographical trajectories, selected due to information disclosed by the network: the most marginal jurist (Ferraris), the anomaly (Cavaglieri) and the most central jurist (Ranelletti).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Social History of Administrative Science in ItalyThe Deinstitutionalisation of Administrative Science

Download PDF
33 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-social-history-of-administrative-science-in-italy-the-kbfGVHRiSd

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
ISBN
978-3-031-17046-1
Pages
91 –124
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-17047-8_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter, after analysing the cultural and political reasons that led the new Catholic University of Milan to invest in the autonomy of Administrative Science in the 1920s and 1930s—the only case in Italy—explains Fascism’s lack of interest of in that knowledge. The regime, in fact, despite having founded an entire faculty (Political Sciences) and some schools of corporate studies to counter liberal legal science’s monopoly on the formation of State elites, allowed Administrative Science to wither until its complete deinstitutionalisation. The chapter looks at a new network (core/periphery) constructed using the competition sources, identifies the jurists who had the power to establish the dominant nomos of the “administrative disciplines” from the end of the Great War to 1935. To outline the specific and strategic contribution of some jurists and their relationships with the political field, the chapter also traces some biographical trajectories, selected due to information disclosed by the network: the most marginal jurist (Ferraris), the anomaly (Cavaglieri) and the most central jurist (Ranelletti).]

Published: Jan 1, 2023

Keywords: Catholic University; Political Sciences; Corporatism; History and Network Analysis; Guido Cavaglieri; Carlo Francesco Ferraris

There are no references for this article.