A Sociology of ImmigrationImmigrants’ Sociocultural and Civic-Political Assimilation: Different Groups, Different Contexts, and Different Trajectories
A Sociology of Immigration: Immigrants’ Sociocultural and Civic-Political Assimilation: Different...
Morawska, Ewa
2015-11-28 00:00:00
[In this chapter we comparatively examine the patterns of sociocultural and civic-political incorporation into the host, American society of members of our eight immigrant groups. The findings on their residential locations, modes of economic incorporation, and reception by native Americans reported in the previous chapter are treated here as circumstances contributing to particular trajectories of immigrants’ socio-cultural and civic-political assimilation.1 The typology of assimilation patterns used in the earlier analysis is also applied to the examination of immigrants’ sociocultural integration. Here, it denotes mainstream and/or ethnic-group dominant and subsidiary “profiles of cultural orientations” (Kluckhohn 1950), reference frameworks, location of social relations, identities, and commitments which usually assume the features of class-position and social milieus of their actor-carriers’ everyday participation.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-sociology-of-immigration-immigrants-sociocultural-and-civic-lufqtJX1ha
A Sociology of ImmigrationImmigrants’ Sociocultural and Civic-Political Assimilation: Different Groups, Different Contexts, and Different Trajectories
[In this chapter we comparatively examine the patterns of sociocultural and civic-political incorporation into the host, American society of members of our eight immigrant groups. The findings on their residential locations, modes of economic incorporation, and reception by native Americans reported in the previous chapter are treated here as circumstances contributing to particular trajectories of immigrants’ socio-cultural and civic-political assimilation.1 The typology of assimilation patterns used in the earlier analysis is also applied to the examination of immigrants’ sociocultural integration. Here, it denotes mainstream and/or ethnic-group dominant and subsidiary “profiles of cultural orientations” (Kluckhohn 1950), reference frameworks, location of social relations, identities, and commitments which usually assume the features of class-position and social milieus of their actor-carriers’ everyday participation.]
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.