Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Kahneman (2003)
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.The American psychologist, 58 9
H. Simon (1970)
The Sciences of the Artificial
H. Simon (1990)
Invariants of human behavior.Annual review of psychology, 41
A. Farrell, J. Goh, Brian White (2014)
The Effect of Performance-Based Incentive Contracts on System 1 and System 2 Processing in Affective Decision Contexts: fMRI and Behavioral EvidenceThe Accounting Review, 89
S. O'Donohoe, Adam Ferrier (2012)
Thinking, Fast and SlowInternational Journal of Advertising, 31
R. Solow, H. Simon (1957)
Models Of Man : Social And Rational
S. Bhattacharjee, Kimberly Moreno, Tracey Riley (2012)
The Interplay of Interpersonal Affect and Source Reliability on Auditors’ Inventory Judgments*Contemporary Accounting Research, 29
A. Damasio, D. Tranel, H. Damasio (1990)
Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuliBehavioural Brain Research, 41
Emily Griffith, Jacqueline Hammersley, Kathryn Kadous, Donald Young (2015)
Auditor Mindsets and Audits of Complex Estimates: auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimatesJournal of Accounting Research, 53
H. Simon (1956)
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Psychological review, 63 2
S. Bhattacharjee, Kimberly Moreno (2002)
The impact of affective information on the professional judgments of more experienced and less experienced auditorsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15
Christine Nolder, Kathryn Kadous (2014)
The Way Forward on Professional Skepticism: Conceptualizing Professional Skepticism as an Attitude
M. Nelson (2009)
A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in AuditingEar and Hearing, 28
H. Simon (1955)
A Behavioral Model of Rational ChoiceQuarterly Journal of Economics, 69
R. Hurtt, Helen Brown-Liburd, Christine Earley, G. Krishnamoorthy (2013)
Research on Auditor Professional Skepticism: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future ResearchAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 32
G. Campitelli, F. Gobet (2010)
Herbert Simon's Decision-Making Approach: Investigation of Cognitive Processes in ExpertsReview of General Psychology, 14
L. Quadackers, T. Groot, A. Wright (2009)
A study of auditors' skeptical characteristics and their relationship to skeptical judgments and decisions
A. Cappelen, T. Eichele, K. Hugdahl, K. Specht, Erik Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden (2014)
Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic studyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111
G. Hofstede, G. Hofstede, M. Minkov, McGraw-Hill New (2010)
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed.
P. Slovic, Melissa Finucane, E. Peters, D. MacGregor (2007)
The affect heuristicEur. J. Oper. Res., 177
S. Sloman (1996)
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 119
K. Stanovich, R. West (2000)
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23
Mark Defond, Jieying Zhang (2014)
A Review of Archival Auditing ResearchERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)
L. Quadackers, T. Groot, A. Wright (2014)
Auditors’ Professional Skepticism: Neutrality versus Presumptive Doubt†Contemporary Accounting Research, 31
A. Damasio (1994)
Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books
Emily Griffith, Jacqueline Hammersley, Kathryn Kadous, Donald Young (2014)
Auditor Mindsets and Audits of Complex EstimatesBehavioral & Experimental Accounting eJournal
[The International Standard on Auditing (IFAC, International Federation of Accountants (2009) in International Standard on Auditing 200 (ISA 200) Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. International Federation of Accountant (IFAC), NY, 2009, ISA No. 200) defines professional skepticism as a multifaceted mindset reflected in auditors’ attitude. The professional skepticism multifaceted mindset is reflected in auditors’ attitude and includes a questioning mind, alertness to circumstances that may imply misstatements due to error or fraud, and a critical evaluation of audit evidence (IFAC, International Federation of Accountants (2009) in International Standard on Auditing 200 (ISA 200) Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. International Federation of Accountant (IFAC), NY, 2009, ISA No. 200). In this chapter explains what professional skepticism is more in depth, why it is important to study professional skepticism and then discusses the challenges encountered by accounting researchers, professionals and regulators with respect to professional skepticism in accounting. Because an experimental study of professional skepticism is conducted in Norway, the chapter also presents the institutional settings in Norway. Finally, the chapter describes Two-System theory and affect which are used in the experimental study in the Chap. 2.]
Published: Feb 3, 2017
Keywords: Accounting; Affect; International standard on auditing (ISA); Challenges; Institutional settings in norway; Judgment and decision-making; Professional skepticism; Two-System theory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.