Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[As it is discussed above, regardless of the morally shocking incidents, the import of external resources or the rise of grassroots leaders, there is a certain contingency and randomness in the initial release of vigor. In particular, the role of grassroots leaders seems to be both critical and ambiguous. No matter the base of moral courage, interest consideration, or life grievances, their rise has a certain degree of randomness. However, in the cases under study, in the period as short as 4 or 5 ;years, or as long as a decade, the contentious activities are both tortuous and hard to advance; they are both unpredictable and well organized. Though grassroots participants suffer from the activities, and are even thrown into jail, they are still as firm and persistent as ever. Obviously, those factors of contingency, randomness, and anger are not enough to support these long-lasting contentions.]
Published: Feb 13, 2013
Keywords: Local Government; Social Stability; Stability Maintenance; Grassroots Organization; Grassroots Level
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.