Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Malthus and Ricardo disagree over whether capitalists chronically consume less than they earn, which leads them to radically different conclusions about the nature of short term economic cycles and the possibility of secular stagnation. In this chapter the competing positions are placed into a general equilibrium framework, where it is shown that their respective conclusions hold up. If, as Ricardo contends, people are never satiated and ultimately spend all their income on final goods, it is plausible the economy hones in on full employment. If, as Malthus contends, capitalists spend only a small portion of their profits on final goods, the economy will not reach full employment, and output will fluctuate around a low growth trend that is determined by aggregate demand.]
Published: Aug 5, 2016
Keywords: effective demand; general glut; Keynes and the classics; liquidity preference; Say’s Principle
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.