Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[To advance a coherent statement of defensive realism, we need to first define what defensive realism is. This is no easy task, primarily because there have been so many realisms out there, even if we merely restrict our scope to IR. These include structural realism, neorealism (Waltz 1979), modified realism (Krasner 1982a), classical realism, modern realism (Frankel 1995–1996), neoclassical realism (Rose 1998), post-classical realism (Brooks 1997), contingent realism (Glaser 1994–1995), cultural realism (Johnston 1995), offensive/aggressive realism, defensive realism (Snyder 1991), Bayesian realism (Kydd 2005), general realism, specific realism (Rosecrance 2002), hardcore realism, soft realism (Larson 1997), motivational realism (Kydd 1997b), and human nature realism (Mearsheimer 2001, 19–22). No wonder Glenn Snyder simply gave up counting (Snyder 2002, 149–150).]
Published: Nov 7, 2015
Keywords: Relative Power; Realist State; Security Strategy; Relative Gain; International Politics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.