Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[We have, so far, outlined a theory of truces and defended it against charges of cynicism and appeasement. We have also established that truce thinking has a “deep” history in the West’s intellectual tradition. It is now time to situate truce thinking in a more contemporary “intellectual neighborhood.” In this chapter I examine how it is related to recent debates in political philosophy and international relations theory. Specifically, I examine its ties to the “political theory of modus vivendi” developed since the start of this century by thinkers such as John Gray and John Horton, to philosophical accounts of political reconciliation in the aftermath of mass violence, and to discussions about the meaning of containment in international relations. This chapter should both orient the reader as to the place of the proposed theory of truces in the current scholarly literature and further bring into focus, by means of comparison, some of the theory’s most distinctive features.]
Published: Dec 21, 2015
Keywords: Political Theory; Transitional Justice; Political Trust; Philosophical Account; Peace Agreement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.