A Transnational Account of Turkish Foreign PolicyImperial Transnationalism: Turkish Middle East-Oriented Foreign Policy Expert Apparatus (1998–2011)
A Transnational Account of Turkish Foreign Policy: Imperial Transnationalism: Turkish Middle...
Le Moulec, Jean-Baptiste
2020-05-26 00:00:00
[This chapter deals with the transnational production of knowledge by one section of Turkey’s intellectual elite, mainly scholars and journalists, who advocated the country’s active involvement in the Middle East. It shows that by the end of the 2000s this intellectual support had generated policy-related knowledge, and a full-fledged expertise on Middle Eastern policy, together with recently founded think tanks and a pro-government epistemic community. It discusses their expertise, which was based on education and cultural capital mostly accumulated by individual actors in western academic institutions. This chapter argues that a growing demand for empirical knowledge on the region, in line with Turkey’s foreign policy aims, increased the relevance of these specialists. However, they were in fact reliant on their western-shaped knowledge, unable to offer a more locally shaped look at the Middle East.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-transnational-account-of-turkish-foreign-policy-imperial-KgEfODmQri
A Transnational Account of Turkish Foreign PolicyImperial Transnationalism: Turkish Middle East-Oriented Foreign Policy Expert Apparatus (1998–2011)
[This chapter deals with the transnational production of knowledge by one section of Turkey’s intellectual elite, mainly scholars and journalists, who advocated the country’s active involvement in the Middle East. It shows that by the end of the 2000s this intellectual support had generated policy-related knowledge, and a full-fledged expertise on Middle Eastern policy, together with recently founded think tanks and a pro-government epistemic community. It discusses their expertise, which was based on education and cultural capital mostly accumulated by individual actors in western academic institutions. This chapter argues that a growing demand for empirical knowledge on the region, in line with Turkey’s foreign policy aims, increased the relevance of these specialists. However, they were in fact reliant on their western-shaped knowledge, unable to offer a more locally shaped look at the Middle East.]
Published: May 26, 2020
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.