Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter raises a critique of methodological nationalism’s dominancy in the way transnationality is studied within mainstream International Relations and adopts Beckian methodological cosmopolitanism for going beyond such a scholarly bias. Methodological cosmopolitanism, the study suggests, would enable IR and foreign policy scholarship (1) to elaborate and report the world they are studying (or the knowledge about the realities of it) without contributing to its reification as a material setting, and (2) to better understand the transnational and cosmopolitan shifts the contemporary world has gone through, by which the core units, levels and structures of research the scholarship adopt would be transnationally redefined. Here, the chapter introduces a domestic global politics framework as part of a quest for transnational cosmopolitan foreign policy research and applies it to explaining the transnational character and complexity of the Syrian civil war and the responses to it from within territorial Turkey.]
Published: May 26, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.